Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
I did read it.

"Opinion polls in Ukraine have shown that both support for fighting against Russia and for Mr Zelensky have fallen, although they are still above 60 per cent."

I mean 81% is above 60%.

No actual figures, no source, just trust me bro figures.
Come on. You're not daft....hold on...
 
I did read it.

"Opinion polls in Ukraine have shown that both support for fighting against Russia and for Mr Zelensky have fallen, although they are still above 60 per cent."

I mean 81% is above 60%.

No actual figures, no source, just trust me bro figures.
 


:(

Not looking good for the fella, I did say, at some point, The West would get bored.

The largest strategic threat to Ukraine's security was always Washington's willingness to keep the spigot running. Not much different from EFC and Moshiri, in some ways.

The problem isn't boredom. It's that absolutely everything in Washington has become politicized, including traditionally nonpartisan issues like national security and public health. It turns out that the fundraising maximizer is continuous doom-mongering about the other side's positions, and the media is happy to play ball because it yields inexpensive clicks. Putting politicians on TV costs zero dollars, so that ad revenue is pure profit, and the requisite talking heads are cheap when compared to traditional content. It's the same reasoning behind the reality TV boom.

Sooner or later, this was bound to happen. Funding Ukraine is the biggest no-brainer winner of a US national security policy since the CIA ran arms to the mujahideen of Afghanistan in the 1980s. The folks in Congress, however, no longer take meaningful low-hanging fruit. They do stuff like rename post offices while in session, then go back to the real business of fundraising and building name recognition via the media.
 
The largest strategic threat to Ukraine's security was always Washington's willingness to keep the spigot running. Not much different from EFC and Moshiri, in some ways.

The problem isn't boredom. It's that absolutely everything in Washington has become politicized, including traditionally nonpartisan issues like national security and public health. It turns out that the fundraising maximizer is continuous doom-mongering about the other side's positions, and the media is happy to play ball because it yields inexpensive clicks. Putting politicians on TV costs zero dollars, so that ad revenue is pure profit, and the requisite talking heads are cheap when compared to traditional content. It's the same reasoning behind the reality TV boom.

Sooner or later, this was bound to happen. Funding Ukraine is the biggest no-brainer winner of a US national security policy since the CIA ran arms to the mujahideen of Afghanistan in the 1980s. The folks in Congress, however, no longer take meaningful low-hanging fruit. They do stuff like rename post offices while in session, then go back to the real business of fundraising and building name recognition via the media.
Commies dead with zero casualties? Idyllic.
The irony is there are no commies, it's mafioso.

Please look at the word 'mafioso' there.

Anyone playing along, which mafia are you better off served by.
 
Probably worth pointing out that Ukraine are not losing this war. If anything Russia has been pushed back from every objective and is now behind defensive lines designed to slow/halt Ukraines progress. These lines have been successful and there is something of a stalemate at present. Ukraine need further equipment to destroy these defensive lines, such as air power, longer range missiles and it has been made clear that these won't arrive until early 2024.
 


:(

Not looking good for the fella, I did say, at some point, The West would get bored.

Insinuating that Republicans are somehow and in some form under Putin's sway isn't going to help, is it?

“If there’s anyone inspired by unresolved issues on Capitol Hill, it’s just (Russian President Vladimir) Putin and his sick clique,”

As I said last night, it's time for this feller to go and Zaluzhny to take command of Ukraine's fortunes. He's a soldier and a realist about what can be achieved.

Zelensky is for Zelensky.
 
Probably worth pointing out that Ukraine are not losing this war. If anything Russia has been pushed back from every objective and is now behind defensive lines designed to slow/halt Ukraines progress. These lines have been successful and there is something of a stalemate at present. Ukraine need further equipment to destroy these defensive lines, such as air power, longer range missiles and it has been made clear that these won't arrive until early 2024.
The conflict has reached stalemate full stop, not just for the moment.

People who command forces know that. People like Zaluzhny who has said so.
 
The conflict has reached stalemate full stop, not just for the moment.

People who command forces know that. People like Zaluzhny who has said so.
Yes, they need air power to move forward. Its the West's fault for not supplying this sooner.

The winter was always going to be a pause or slow down. Come the spring the Ukraine push to the sea will recommence.
 
Yes, they need air power to move forward. Its the West's fault for not supplying this sooner.

The winter was always going to be a pause or slow down. Come the spring the Ukraine push to the sea will recommence.
Air power? What has Russian air supremacy done for them? They cant even use their air force they''d be sitting ducks. And so would any Ukrainian attempt to control the airspace from the skies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

đź›’ Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top