There's a lot of Ifs in there.Dave - I’d say given the lack of air superiority and in the face of 10Km deep minefields, trenches and fixed fortifications the strategy employed by the Ukes is the only one available to them. If they are to stand any chance at the negotiating table they have to split the Russian army by reaching the Azov coast and isolate Crimea.
They have broken through the first lines of defence in a few places most significantly south of Robotyne. Apparently yesterday saw the first real tank on tank battle (Leopards v T-55,s). Apparently it was a slaughter.
If they capture Tokmak then that cuts of a major supply route to Ru forces in Kherson and could shape the future of this conflict.
It’s easy for us though to sit in judgement and speak for Ukranians when they see it as an existential fight against an imperialist invading aggressor. They are fighting for their freedom, their families and their future. They are the ones who should ultimately decide when and how this war stops not us in the west. If they want to continue then we should continue to support them and give them the tools to do the job,
Agreed and this is not going to help the Ukes cause in any wayYou'll see more attacks on Crimea and drone attacks on Russian soil as the counter offensive continues to fail for Ukriane and the bad weather freezes the conflict for 5 months.
Inevitable.
Or you could look at it another way.You'll see more attacks on Crimea and drone attacks on Russian soil as the counter offensive continues to fail for Ukriane and the bad weather freezes the conflict for 5 months.
Inevitable.
Agree - a lot of ifs but let’s just see how it pans outThere's a lot of Ifs in there.
I think we both know there'll be no cracking of that front line. The Ukrainians will continue to nibble away at it until the weather changes things and that'll be that. There's no western military analyst predicting anything like a splitting of Russian forces that ends the land corridor to Crimea.
I don’t know what point you’re trying to make?Or you could look at it another way.
1. Continued drone strikes on Moscow force Ru to redeploy valuable air defence assets away from Ukraine/Crimea
2. Continued SOF missions further degrade air defence /EW systems around Crimea
3. This effectively opens the way for more cruise missile strikes against key Russian targets (Ships, subs, C2). The stuff that’s really gonna hurt them
funny that just over 17 months ago the Ukranians were making petrol bombs in Kyiv, now they’re planning and executing complex combined arms ops that are shaping the battlefield.
Looks like Moscow is on fire again.
Agreed and this is not going to help the Ukes cause in any way
They are doing this because they have absolutely no other cards left to play .
There is no way Russia will ever surrender any parts of the newly absorbed territories on the back of a few drones.
Absolute own goal from NATO
I’m just providing a scenario based on what I see happening.I don’t know what point you’re trying to make?
Is any of this going to force Russia to surrender territory ?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.