vaults please.No one here revels in the death of any children.
Even those types of comments are bandied about as a means of tarnishing views that don’t fit in with the continuation of western hegemony
vaults please.No one here revels in the death of any children.
Even those types of comments are bandied about as a means of tarnishing views that don’t fit in with the continuation of western hegemony
What are the logical reasons? Don't say Russian security because the country with the most Nukes in the world can't seriously be concerned for its security.I do hold a somewhat different view to you in that I believe Russia has perfectly justifiable reasons for prosecuting this war (which I don’t think you do correct me if I’m wrong?) and to see it to it’s logical conclusion whatever that may be. Either Ukro surrender or some kind of peace deal acceptable to the Russian Federation.
But where we do have no dispute is around the shamefully cynically opportunistic position of the west coupled with the grift of Zelenski and his stooges.
My fear is that the west AND Zelenski are maniacs who will not be diverted from their joint destruction
I do hold a somewhat different view to you in that I believe Russia has perfectly justifiable reasons for prosecuting this war (which I don’t think you do correct me if I’m wrong?) and to see it to it’s logical conclusion whatever that may be. Either Ukro surrender or some kind of peace deal acceptable to the Russian Federation.
But where we do have no dispute is around the shamefully cynically opportunistic position of the west coupled with the grift of Zelenski and his stooges.
My fear is that the west AND Zelenski are maniacs who will not be diverted from their joint destruction
Look, all I'm saying is that this conflict is not going the way that most want it to. In that case there has to be 1/ a recognition of that and 2/ a formula that sets in motion the beginning of the end of conflict and peace itself based on the best terms the Ukrainians can get.
Kev takes the view that the Russians will need a comprehensive victory for peace to be called from their end of it. I disagree. I think a peace deal guaranteed by the west which allows Russia their land corridor to Crimea and a promise that NATO is off the table can get the Russians agreement. Then Ukraine can win the peace by getting billions reconstruction cash and eventually entering western institutions like the EU and become part of a trading family.
The border between Russia and Ukraine has been re-written and that's the realpolitik of all this. It shouldn't be that way but it is.

Then I have more faith in the mods than you, apparently.He was thread banned almost immediately when this thread opened, for his posting of vile and disgusting anti Ukrainian posts.
Pretty similar to what he’s doing now tbh.
The only difference being, is that he’s now learnt how to take his posts right up to the threshold of getting banned and then pulls back slightly, once it looks like he’s about to get banned again.
You’re supporting and aligning yourself with someone who’s posted some of the most vile, evil and disgusting stuff in the history of this fine forum comrade.
What you think is how I think it will end, apart from NATO membership.. Russia will get crimia and some of the annexed areas but the remainder of Ukraine will become NATO members. This is the only way that ensures Russia won't be back for more in a decade.. it's either that or unconditional surrender or Russia that ends the war.Look, all I'm saying is that this conflict is not going the way that most want it to. In that case there has to be 1/ a recognition of that and 2/ a formula that sets in motion the beginning of the end of conflict and peace itself based on the best terms the Ukrainians can get.
Kev takes the view that the Russians will need a comprehensive victory for peace to be called from their end of it. I disagree. I think a peace deal guaranteed by the west which allows Russia their land corridor to Crimea and a promise that NATO is off the table can get the Russians agreement. Then Ukraine can win the peace by getting billions reconstruction cash and eventually entering western institutions like the EU and become part of a trading family.
The border between Russia and Ukraine has been re-written and that's the realpolitik of all this. It shouldn't be that way but it is.
The logical reasons are multiple but the thing that seals it for me is the presence of a large group of people in the Donbas who have suffered from constant abuse and demonisation by the Kiev regime for 10 years because they are Russian , they speak Russian and wish to be part of Russia.What are the logical reasons? Don't say Russian security because the country with the most Nukes in the world can't seriously be concerned for its security.
Nazis in Ukraine is another BS excuse there's a bigger element of neo-nazis in Russia than Ukraine ever had. There are only 2 reasons that I can see for this war.
1. It's a land grab for resources.
2. Putins and Russias elite's utter fear of democracy
I ‘revel’ in no one’s deaths let alone children’s.
No, but you've said the deliberate killing of civilians is justified.I ‘revel’ in no one’s deaths let alone children’s.
in which case both sides are guilty of war crimesNo, but you've said the deliberate killing of civilians is justified.
The deliberate killing of civilians is a war crime, by either side of a conflict btw.
If tomorrow the UK decided it wanted Ireland back and invaded it by force, killing and raping its people, refusing to leave and threatening anybody who dared try and intervene with nuclear armageddon, I'd love to see you standing behind the principle you espouse here.I know they did. And they need to get out. However the reality is they are a military super power and wont be leaving. So what's the path forward...more young men fed into the giant meatgrinder so Zelensky can remain in power waltzing round the world in his comical khaki fatigue gear never having raised a fist to the Russians?
There is an extremely strong argument that Northern Ireland should be handed back to Ireland tomorrowIf tomorrow the UK decided it wanted Ireland back and invaded it by force, killing and raping its people, refusing to leave and threatening anybody who dared try and intervene with nuclear armageddon, I'd love to see you standing behind the principle you espouse here.
Dombas was started by Russia, the separatists were Russian army not the people of Dombas.. even Putin admitted this "any Russians involved were volunteers following a call of the heart" that's Kremlin speak for we planted the whole thing.The logical reasons are multiple but the thing that seals it for me is the presence of a large majority of people in the Donbas who have suffered from constant abuse by the Kiev regime for 10 years.
Any withdrawal of Russian forces will not stop these poor peoples cry for help. It must be resolved and the integration of these areas into the arissian Federation makes backtracking on Russias part near impossible.
The wall of silence around this issue in the west is so great that even regular posters here claimed to have no clue about any of this
For them, ‘Putin bad man’ - and that’s the end of it.
I don’t think Putin is interested in the Banderites in the west - he’s actually said once that the Poles can have them - but he might end up going there in a few years if it’s the only way out. And it would be by means of escalation which the west maybe want.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.