Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
The sooner someone ends him, the better.
There'll be a queue of similar or worse dirtballs only to ready to step into his warm shoes. This is a long term war of attrition, much the same as what we knew as the cold war, it never ended, there was a hiatus where the 'enemy' retreated and recalculated and came back with new tactics, and now the machine of capitalism is being wielded against those that crushed the first iteration. The west have sleep walked into this bear trap, and now it's emergency stations to manage losses. Still, there's been money made in the 'good times' and once you've feathered your nest, it's someone else's problem....
'I'm alright Jack'.
 
Do you consider it wanton destruction of property and civilian settlements (through flooding)? If so yes.

If there is a strategic military importance to the dam, then it gets trickier to argue.
Either way, it's a tactic of last resort used only by the extremely desperate. Which does not fill me with confidence when it comes to their nuclear arsenal.
 
Either way, it's a tactic of last resort used only by the extremely desperate. Which does not fill me with confidence when it comes to their nuclear arsenal.
Given that Zelenskiy has given warning about the dam before it happened, I presume that this has already been assessed and is not something unexpected. If that's the case then the NATO backed intelligence is confident that the current Ukraine offensive won't engage any of Russia's nuclear arsenal.

Unless we have the Roberto Martinez of military tactician that is ... defence? No comprendo.
 
Given that Zelenskiy has given warning about the dam before it happened, I presume that this has already been assessed and is not something unexpected. If that's the case then the NATO backed intelligence is confident that the current Ukraine offensive won't engage any of Russia's nuclear arsenal.

Unless we have the Roberto Martinez of military tactician that is ... defence? No comprendo.
I don't mean tomorrow. What I mean is, if Putin is detonating dams then we know he's running out of conventional options. If pressure starts to build on him...

This is turning into the sort of scenario where I would tell you someone might actually use one. First use by a democratic regime more or less guarantees removal from office. Bilateral mutually assured destruction seems to work, mad as it is. The disaster scenario is an authoritarian regime under pressure both from within and without facing an opponent armed only with conventional forces. First use probably leads to a coup, but that's not a certainty. If you're in that box and you know a coup is coming anyway, why not? What's the worst that can happen? They kill you for treason either way if the coup succeeds, so why not do absolutely anything to try and stop it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top