Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
The charade of condemnation at the UN is obscene.

In any reasonable world, their decision would be, Russia you are bang out of order.

We’re coming in, harm any of our troops and we’ll batter you into the 15th century.

You have a week to GTF out of Ukraine or else.

I don’t get why this hasn’t been whispered in Putin’s ear.
 
UK, French, and German officials are reportedly preparing a NATO-Ukraine pact that falls far short of the protections Ukraine would receive from NATO membership and appears to reflect a desire to press Ukraine to accept a negotiated settlement on unfavorable terms.[1] The Wall Street Journal reported that the exact provisions of the pact are undecided, but the officials indicated that the pact will provide advanced military equipment, arms, and ammunition to Ukraine, but not Article V protection or a commitment to station NATO forces in Ukraine—falling short of Ukraine’s aspirations for full NATO membership. The officials stated that the pact aims to provision Ukraine so that Ukrainian forces can conduct a counteroffensive that brings Russia to the negotiating table and deter any future Russian aggression. The Wall Street Journal noted that these officials expressed reservations about the West’s ability to sustain a prolonged war effort, the high casualty count that Ukraine would sustain in such a prolonged war, and Ukrainian forces’ ability to completely recapture long-occupied territories like Crimea, however. The Wall Street Journal contrasted these officials’ private reservations with US President Joe Biden’s public statements of support—which did not mention peace negotiations—and with Central and Eastern European leaders’ concerns that premature peace negotiations would encourage further Russian aggression. Russian President Vladimir Putin has given no indication that he is willing to compromise on his stated maximalist goals, which include Ukraine’s “neutrality” and demilitarization—as well as de facto regime change in Kyiv, as ISW has consistently reported.[2]
 
The charade of condemnation at the UN is obscene.

In any reasonable world, their decision would be, Russia you are bang out of order.

We’re coming in, harm any of our troops and we’ll batter you into the 15th century.

You have a week to GTF out of Ukraine or else.

I don’t get why this hasn’t been whispered in Putin’s ear.
Without mentioning the appetite for war within the west, both financially and in terms of life, the real problem to this reasoning is Russia's nuclear capability.

If this was like Iraq with Kuwait, the situation may be very different, but it isn't. Right now, at a much lower cost, the west is seeing Russian forces being depleted.

Russia will not be allowed to gain control of Ukraine due to the resources being provided and, importantly, will be blunted force for a fair while to come.
 
UK, French, and German officials are reportedly preparing a NATO-Ukraine pact that falls far short of the protections Ukraine would receive from NATO membership and appears to reflect a desire to press Ukraine to accept a negotiated settlement on unfavorable terms.[1] The Wall Street Journal reported that the exact provisions of the pact are undecided, but the officials indicated that the pact will provide advanced military equipment, arms, and ammunition to Ukraine, but not Article V protection or a commitment to station NATO forces in Ukraine—falling short of Ukraine’s aspirations for full NATO membership. The officials stated that the pact aims to provision Ukraine so that Ukrainian forces can conduct a counteroffensive that brings Russia to the negotiating table and deter any future Russian aggression. The Wall Street Journal noted that these officials expressed reservations about the West’s ability to sustain a prolonged war effort, the high casualty count that Ukraine would sustain in such a prolonged war, and Ukrainian forces’ ability to completely recapture long-occupied territories like Crimea, however. The Wall Street Journal contrasted these officials’ private reservations with US President Joe Biden’s public statements of support—which did not mention peace negotiations—and with Central and Eastern European leaders’ concerns that premature peace negotiations would encourage further Russian aggression. Russian President Vladimir Putin has given no indication that he is willing to compromise on his stated maximalist goals, which include Ukraine’s “neutrality” and demilitarization—as well as de facto regime change in Kyiv, as ISW has consistently reported.[2]

Someone has some sanity left, then.
 
The charade of condemnation at the UN is obscene.

In any reasonable world, their decision would be, Russia you are bang out of order.

We’re coming in, harm any of our troops and we’ll batter you into the 15th century.

You have a week to GTF out of Ukraine or else.

I don’t get why this hasn’t been whispered in Putin’s ear.
The UN are powerless and irrelevant. Time for a total re-structure. The whole house needs tearing down and rebuilding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top