Yeah, try biting the hand that feeds you, see what happens.
It's the Everton wayYeah, try biting the hand that feeds you, see what happens.
Amazing how there's such a level of surveillance. Many years ago, the initial claims of Ukraine would've been accepted on face value and we'd likely have a dangerous escalationSpot on mate.
I said last night Millitary Intelligence will have known from the moment they where launched , where from & who deployed them.
This could have been nipped in the bud if indeed they are Ukraine retaliative missiles very early doors , instead of fuelling a media frenzy.
But of course Putin can stop things like this happening any time he wishes.
Amazing how there's such a level of surveillance. Many years ago, the initial claims of Ukraine would've been accepted on face value and we'd likely have a dangerous escalation
This is why. Zelenskyy hasn't made many media missteps. If he's trying to entangle NATO, he probably has something with which to back it up. A stone bluff doesn't make sense here. Ukraine is obviously better off admitting the problem, if they're in fact responsible.Yeah, try biting the hand that feeds you, see what happens.
Tends to support the conclusion that the rocket was in fact Russian, and that this is being hushed up.
This is why. Zelenskyy hasn't made many media missteps. If he's trying to entangle NATO, he probably has something with which to back it up. A stone bluff doesn't make sense here. Ukraine is obviously better off admitting the problem, if they're in fact responsible.
Interesting thought. You're suggesting that he's playing to his domestic audience, rather than NATO. I think he's bulletproof if he wins the war outright, and he has a history of doing or saying anything in the media that might wring further concessions from NATO, but you might be correct that he's hedging his bets in case things turn into a slog.It might - as I said, its exactly the sort of thing the Russians do. Admitting fault would only work with Western audiences; suggesting that you'd be ready to do nearly anything to win works with Russian ones (or at least the people at the top).
Interesting thought. You're suggesting that he's playing to his domestic audience, rather than NATO. I think he's bulletproof if he wins the war outright, and he has a history of doing or saying anything in the media that might wring further concessions from NATO, but you might be correct that he's hedging his bets in case things turn into a slog.
Talking about Turkey, they're a bit further out of alignment after the explosion this week. If they fall out with the US what's it going to mean for NATO and Ukraine?I didn't mean he was hedging his bets, I meant he was acting in ways which the Russian elite would understand.
If he admitted this was them and organized a tearful, carefully controlled meeting between him and selected family members of the dead men then he'd be doing what Western leaders would do.
Doing this, and getting his government and media to push it out is what the Russian state would do. I think doing it is much more likely to get at least respect from the other side. Lets not forget that, in foreign relations at least, Putin tends to respect those who stand up to him (take Erdogan for example, who has seen his forces shoot down a Russian bomber and kill the Russian ambassador in the past few years and yet gets treated as an honoured guest).
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.