Does he not realise that hashtags don’t actually do anything on GoT yet? Or is he still on his #JetFuelDoesntMeltSteelBeams vibe?#NoFliesOnOddBod...
Does he not realise that hashtags don’t actually do anything on GoT yet? Or is he still on his #JetFuelDoesntMeltSteelBeams vibe?#NoFliesOnOddBod...
Oliver stone is the mainstream though.
He’s done a five part interview with Putin that’s on sky. It doesn’t get more mainstream than an Oscar winner and one of the most successful film directors of all time creating something for sky.
You go on like you’re the only person who’s watched his stuff. It’s weird.
Any half decent critical thinker would look at his relationship with Putin and question anything he says about the situation in Eastern Europe.
Mainstream media isn’t just the BBC you know.
Wasting your time, circle-jerk is a katie hopkins light, take the pish insted. works wonders.Your entire ignorant post was dripping with self-righteousness and ITK. I called you out on it, as did others. You've tried to walk it back now twice, and both times you've come off like a hog on ice.
You are clearly confused and need help. I mean it. I don't fume when I easily swat-away your ignorant ramblings--it's more like a combination of pity and self-amusement. You are an easy target because you are all cringey gaffe and no substance, fed by a healthy diet of far-right youtube videos. Imagine being born into this life only to waste your later years in perpetual self-embarrassment on the internet. Jog on you non-essential mooncalf.
True, odders is like a fart at a party. Best to just wince a bit, and politely ignore it hoping it goes away soonWasting your time, circle-jerk is a katie hopkins light, take the pish insted. works wonders.
Have you been a good boy/girl this year? Wish very hard and maybe it`ll come true.Personally, I've never tried to get him banned (nor ever even reported a post here on GOT) but I wish he'd take his ignorant hate-filled nonsense to Parler or Reddit.
Please can you grant me my wish...Have you been a good boy/girl this year? Wish very hard and maybe it`ll come true.
#ThereThereThere
I actively tried to, but failed miserably. I now have to just tolerate him like that relative everyone hates at a family partyPersonally, I've never tried to get him banned (nor ever even reported a post here on GOT) but I wish he'd take his ignorant hate-filled nonsense to Parler or Reddit.
Now now, lets not go saying anything we can't take back later...
It is often time to laugh. Life's to short to be gotten down by internet stupidity.I actively tried to, but failed miserably. I now have to just tolerate him like that relative everyone hates at a family party
True, no point in it getting to you when you know that all odders does is bludgeon another innocent cat whenever he gets annoyed by GoTIt is often time to laugh. Life's to short to be gotten down by internet stupidity.
#LetsGetHimSiegfried&RoysTiger...True, no point in it getting to you when you know that all odders does is bludgeon another innocent cat whenever he gets annoyed by GoT
#IOnlyMurderAnimalsThatCantFightBack#LetsGetHimSiegfried&RoysTiger...
We had a very short discussion about science fiction a while ago and although i thought the Foundation books were brilliant it`s not really my thing. I`ll get a copy of Animal Farm sometime but 1984 as good an idea as it is was very forgettable in a literary sense and in no way did it make me want to re-read it. I`d sooner re-read stuff by John Irving or Kurt Vonnegut whose ideas and characterisations make them a stand out for me.1) Context is important. Asimov writing about things that would not come to pass until decades later is impressive. The better part of a century later, this may not seem as impressive to you at first glance. Orwell did very well for himself on this dimension. 1984 and Animal Farm were prescient indeed.
2) You don't have to be a 'great writer' in the literary sense to be a 'great science-fiction writer'. Bradbury was a super-strong writer, judged on literary terms. Orwell and Heinlein were good. Asimov and Clarke were average.
They are all legends of science fiction for a reason. Asimov and Clarke made up for technical weaknesses on the ideas side. All five were extremely influential, and remain so. Heinlein probably comes off the worst of the five in terms of long-term legacy, but Starship Troopers has been retold well by two successive generations. Stranger In a Strange Land was one of the big counterculture books. All five writers still matter.
I don`t disagree with him! I was making a comparison between what he wrote as in everything is turned on its head i.e.war is peace to what is happening now i.e. antifa are fascists.But why did you bring Orwell into the conversation, to defend your point of view, if you disagree with him?
I don`t disagree with him! I was making a comparison between what he wrote as in everything is turned on its head i.e.war is peace to what is happening now i.e. antifa are fascists.
I have not. I have read Irving, he's good, but I haven't had the itch to reread any of it for some time. Vonnegut I have also read, and he's not my personal cup of tea. Abnett is a new one on me.We had a very short discussion about science fiction a while ago and although i thought the Foundation books were brilliant it`s not really my thing. I`ll get a copy of Animal Farm sometime but 1984 as good an idea as it is was very forgettable in a literary sense and in no way did it make me want to re-read it. I`d sooner re-read stuff by John Irving or Kurt Vonnegut whose ideas and characterisations make them a stand out for me.
Have you read Horus Rising by Dan Abnett?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.