So despite a training that should make you aware of the significance of noise and outliers in data you're happy to show a graph where a single data point is supposed to be significant? Or have I misunderstood the point you were trying to make?
Sounds like a wokeflake to me.
That is a valid point, but not quite what I was saying or hinting at.
it was just typical woke Comradian climate alarmism. You can’t use linear regression to model non linear processes just nope. 
any claim they make on these models is questionable.
I get your point, no modelling is perfect and scientists know and understand it. Its those using the modelling results to push their political opinion we should be criticising.That is a valid point, but not quite what I was saying or hinting at.
They were modelling climate change with linear regression to say climate is increasing every 10 years by 0.22. The equation they were using was something roughly like y= mx +c with m value of 0.22 this equation will just grow and grow, until a large enough x value will return a y value hotter than the sun. Predictor v response is x and y. x is year y is climate.
The basic message is, climate is increasing by 0.22c every 10 years is gobsmackingly
The models they do use can’t predict backwards or forwards accurately. For example, give the model an input value and roll it backwards, it does not match observed values.
When they have used the models to predict it has come out as too hot, someone now saying not hot enough
All the funding goes into proving climate science, anyone who objects is an out cast why there is “100% agreement” not because the science is settled otherwise the models would work! This is not how science should work.
The fundamental issue is sensitivity to initial conditions, chaos theory, cloud formation is chaotic and massively affects climate modelling. They cannot and will not ever be able to get around this fundamental truth.
We can observe climate has increased over the last 100 / 150 years sure but on a geological scale it’s a fart in the wind. I’d love to live for the next few hundred years to see how this plays out! There are plenty of reasons to move away from fossil fuels climate modelling not one for me.
Wrong
You've got a BA in media and comms haven't you?
Yeah, thousands of actually qualified scientists, experts in their field spending their entire life to the subject, have just had their entire life’s work blown apart by a lad who claims to have BSc, uses emojis to express emotions and goes on dates with woman for food and beer
@verreauxiThat is a valid point, but not quite what I was saying or hinting at.
They were modelling climate change with linear regression to say climate is increasing every 10 years by 0.22. The equation they were using was something roughly like y= mx +c with m value of 0.22 this equation will just grow and grow, until a large enough x value will return a y value hotter than the sun. Predictor v response is x and y. x is year y is climate.
The basic message is, climate is increasing by 0.22c every 10 years is gobsmackingly
The models they do use can’t predict backwards or forwards accurately. For example, give the model an input value and roll it backwards, it does not match observed values.
When they have used the models to predict it has come out as too hot, someone now saying not hot enough
All the funding goes into proving climate science, anyone who objects is an out cast why there is “100% agreement” not because the science is settled otherwise the models would work! This is not how science should work.
The fundamental issue is sensitivity to initial conditions, chaos theory, cloud formation is chaotic and massively affects climate modelling. They cannot and will not ever be able to get around this fundamental truth.
We can observe climate has increased over the last 100 / 150 years sure but on a geological scale it’s a fart in the wind. I’d love to live for the next few hundred years to see how this plays out! There are plenty of reasons to move away from fossil fuels climate modelling not one for me.
Hahaha...I'm done arguing with clowns on here. Not worth it.
Aye, but thought it might make you chuckle
