So much to unpack in this thread... lol
This week has been a real eye opener to see that there are people that will put more energy into leaping to the defense of the statues of 18th century slave traders than they would to defend the rights of people with darker skin pigment than them. Very telling.
A big one is the argument surrounding 'education' i.e. leave the statues up for people to learn about who these people are.
We have a very strange relationship with education here in the UK in regards to the darker parts of our history. I can't speak for today's curriculum, but I know large swathes of our past were completely overlooked in my school history lessons.
The British Empire was built on the bodies of the indigenous people we massacred to 'spread civilisation' and funded by the resources we looted from those countries and the local people who were sold into slavery.
I mean, it's a pretty big thing to overlook, isn't it?
I'd like to think we are going some way to rectify that. Here in Liverpool especially. I mean the whole city was practically built on the vast riches that the slave trade brought in.
The International Slavery Museum is a fantastic resource for learning and I urge anyone who hasn't been before, to do so if you get the opportunity (When the place opens back up obviously)
If you really believe leaving these statues and effigies as a tool for learning, I think this is a far more appropriate setting for them.
Maybe replace the plinths with statues of the people who fought hard to end slavery. The educational value remains, we don't shy away from our past, but instead use it to highlight those that sought to change it rather than glorify those who profited from it.