Current Affairs The Landmarks of Slavery;

Status
Not open for further replies.
We should do this with all statues then right?

... seriously what the actual hell would this achieve, honestly. Proper baffling.

Well there is a pretty interesting statue graveyard just outside of Vilnius called Grutas Park. Its actually a tourist attraction...
 
It was you who professed to know the answer, so answer it. Why was it erected 175 years after his death?
The memorial’s inscription read that it was “erected by citizens of Bristol as a memorial of one of the most virtuous and wise sons of their city AD 1895”. Not what you would say about him now applying 2020 morals to his actions, but that right there is the reason the statue was erected. There is no denying the fact that the man did good things for the city, and people wanted to remember him for that.. you seem intent on applying modern standards to people of the past and that is one of the most illogical things a person could do, because you'll end up at the conclusion that pretty much everything over 100 years old needs to be destroyed.
 
So much to unpack in this thread... lol

This week has been a real eye opener to see that there are people that will put more energy into leaping to the defense of the statues of 18th century slave traders than they would to defend the rights of people with darker skin pigment than them. Very telling.

A big one is the argument surrounding 'education' i.e. leave the statues up for people to learn about who these people are.
We have a very strange relationship with education here in the UK in regards to the darker parts of our history. I can't speak for today's curriculum, but I know large swathes of our past were completely overlooked in my school history lessons.

The British Empire was built on the bodies of the indigenous people we massacred to 'spread civilisation' and funded by the resources we looted from those countries and the local people who were sold into slavery.
I mean, it's a pretty big thing to overlook, isn't it?

I'd like to think we are going some way to rectify that. Here in Liverpool especially. I mean the whole city was practically built on the vast riches that the slave trade brought in. The International Slavery Museum is a fantastic resource for learning and I urge anyone who hasn't been before, to do so if you get the opportunity (When the place opens back up obviously)
If you really believe leaving these statues and effigies as a tool for learning, I think this is a far more appropriate setting for them.

Maybe replace the plinths with statues of the people who fought hard to end slavery. The educational value remains, we don't shy away from our past, but instead use it to highlight those that sought to change it rather than glorify those who profited from it.
 
The memorial’s inscription read that it was “erected by citizens of Bristol as a memorial of one of the most virtuous and wise sons of their city AD 1895”. Not what you would say about him now applying 2020 morals to his actions, but that right there is the reason the statue was erected. There is no denying the fact that the man did good things for the city, and people wanted to remember him for that.. you seem intent on applying modern standards to people of the past and that is one of the most illogical things a person could do, because you'll end up at the conclusion that pretty much everything over 100 years old needs to be destroyed.

I hate this argument, 'the morals of the past', as if everyone in 'the past' was lashing up slaves. Morals and the way things do change over time, but it's entirely possible that they made the wrong decision 100 years ago and it's being corrected now.
 
Maybe replace the plinths with statues of the people who fought hard to end slavery. The educational value remains, we don't shy away from our past, but instead use it to highlight those that sought to change it rather than glorify those who profited from it.

Like who mate? Any suggestions?
 
So much to unpack in this thread... lol

This week has been a real eye opener to see that there are people that will put more energy into leaping to the defense of the statues of 18th century slave traders than they would to defend the rights of people with darker skin pigment than them. Very telling.

A big one is the argument surrounding 'education' i.e. leave the statues up for people to learn about who these people are.
We have a very strange relationship with education here in the UK in regards to the darker parts of our history. I can't speak for today's curriculum, but I know large swathes of our past were completely overlooked in my school history lessons.

The British Empire was built on the bodies of the indigenous people we massacred to 'spread civilisation' and funded by the resources we looted from those countries and the local people who were sold into slavery.
I mean, it's a pretty big thing to overlook, isn't it?

I'd like to think we are going some way to rectify that. Here in Liverpool especially. I mean the whole city was practically built on the vast riches that the slave trade brought in. The International Slavery Museum is a fantastic resource for learning and I urge anyone who hasn't been before, to do so if you get the opportunity (When the place opens back up obviously)
If you really believe leaving these statues and effigies as a tool for learning, I think this is a far more appropriate setting for them.

Maybe replace the plinths with statues of the people who fought hard to end slavery. The educational value remains, we don't shy away from our past, but instead use it to highlight those that sought to change it rather than glorify those who profited from it.
Not just white people saying leave the statues up.. I 100% agree with Sir Geoff Palmer on this.
 

He does already have a statue in Hull for the record. But one of the many people who fought for the abolition of slavery.
Although, in the spirit of things, maybe notable ex-slaves who also fought against the slave trade. I'll be honest and say that's something I am still learning about myself! ;)

He's white and was always hugely privileged.

Anyone who is black?
 
This week has been a real eye opener to see that there are people that will put more energy into leaping to the defense of the statues of 18th century slave traders than they would to defend the rights of people with darker skin pigment than them. Very telling.

What a ridiculously outrageous statement that is to make.

Completely misses the point.

Just because I care about the preservation of history and don't support the proliferation of anarchy does not mean I don't care about racism. One doesn't equate to the other and you really should reconsider whether you should have posted that.
 
I hate this argument, 'the morals of the past', as if everyone in 'the past' was lashing up slaves. Morals and the way things do change over time, but it's entirely possible that they made the wrong decision 100 years ago and it's being corrected now.
Yes mistakes were made in the past, and we need to remember these mistakes, and not just form the opinion that we don't like that anymore get rid of it.
 
What a ridiculously outrageous statement that is to make.

Completely misses the point.

Just because I care about the preservation of history and don't support the proliferation of anarchy does not mean I don't care about racism. One doesn't equate to the other and you really should reconsider whether you should have posted that.
I'm talking about the swathes of people descending on the statues to defend them, who wouldn't lift a finger to support the anti-racism protests.
It's not outrageous - it's the truth.
 
As unpopular as it seems to be to most people.

21st century humans are judging history from hundreds of years ago with the same standard as it is today and finding offence.

The problem is not history , it's people today. They can't grasp that things were different in the past and as such, want to write a different narrative without considering all the facts.

We can educate and learn from it but by changing it , we are in danger of forgetting our roots for a new manufactured one influenced by people who can't grasp the reality of it.

Perhaps people should educate themselves beyond Google and Facebook posts and embrace history whilst understanding why it may not all be great. We can't change the past , after all, just being English attributes us to some horrendous crimes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top