Who is they in this particular instance? From the sounds of things it was a London based artist and a few others pulling a stunt.Here's the thing.
Why black? Why does it have to be part of the slave trade history?
Why can't they erect a different statue of something else in Bristol's history?
The funny thing is , they want to replace a statue of someone who did great things for the city based on the way he obtained the money to do it. They also want to replace him with a statue honouring someone who teared down a statue. They changed nothing but help rip down a statue , if that is what they want to honour then the movement has no credibility other than their own self importance
As has been said by the Mayor, the people of Bristol will decide what replaces it. It may not be slavery related if they choose so.
Given loads of the people angry at the toppling of Colston argue "it was educating people" then surely it should be something that educates about slavery though. That's what people really care about isn't it? That's what got them all upset over the toppling. The loss of an educational figure on slavery

