Decent overview here of what an absolute mess Starmer has landed himself in.
The Labour leader and his general secretary have alienated the Corbynite wing without winning any new allies.
www.newstatesman.com
Jeremy Corbyn’s readmittance is a blow to Keir Starmer – and to his allies’ judgement
The Labour leader and his general secretary have alienated the Corbynite wing without winning any new allies.
Jeremy Corbyn has been issued with a formal warning by Labour and has had his suspension lifted by the party’s ruling National Executive Committee, 19 days after he was suspended due to his response to the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s report, in a row that provides an object lesson of the multiple flaws in Labour’s complaints processes and its handling of antisemitism complaints
Corbyn’s suspension caused uproar among his supporters. The offence of “bringing the party into disrepute” – a category of offence that is deliberately designed to be so broad that almost any behaviour can be said to fall into it – is designed to give a party leadership with a reliable majority on the NEC and its subcommittees a blank cheque for expulsions. But while Keir Starmer does have a reliable majority on the NEC as a whole, he does not have a reliable majority in its various subcommittees As a result, Corbyn has been issued with a warning – but that warning of course looks like a let-off because it coincides with the lifting of his suspension as a party member.
Corbyn’s readmittance has triggered upset and anger among many British Jews. The Jewish Labour Movement, the largest organisation of Jewish Labour members, described a statement issued by the former Labour leader today as “insincere and totally inadequate”, and warned that today’s decision will “embolden” those who agreed with his “grossly offensive” remarks 19 days ago. The Board of Deputies, the Jewish community’s elected communal body, described Corbyn’s readmittance as
a “retrograde step” in a joint statement with the Jewish Leadership Council, an umbrella body of various communal organisations.
The decision will do nothing to repair relations with Britain’s Jewish community, 94 per cent of which did not vote Labour in 2019, and 84 per cent of whom believed Corbyn to be a specific threat to British Jews
according to the Campaign Against Antisemitism’s yearly study of British Jewish concerns about antisemitism and antisemitic attitudes in the wider British community.
For Starmer it is an unmitigated disaster: neither he, nor his general secretary David Evans are trusted by the party’s Corbynite wing in part as a result of the original suspension, but having been outplayed in the party’s internal structures and institutions he has not won any new allies either.
The situation could have been avoided had Evans opted to impose a moratorium on suspensions under the old rules until the new EHRC-approved process is in place,
a route I described the morningthe EHRC report was published.
The reality is that not only is Starmer’s struggle to tackle the problem of Labour antisemitism not over, this specific row has not been resolved either. The EHRC’s statutory powers mean that rule changes will be made and a roster of complaints by the Campaign Against Antisemitism and others against Corbyn and 13 other sitting Labour MPs will once again go through the party’s processes.
What is more revealing is not today’s NEC finding. We knew already that Labour’s internal processes were unfit for purpose and ripe for factional interference. And it is hard to see how, even had the NEC opted for a tougher penalty against Corbyn, the matter would not ultimately have been settled by the new independent process. What is perhaps more significant are the tactical missteps of Evans – and the blow that has been dealt to the man who chose him to be general secretary: Keir Starmer.