I'm from a former coal mining industry, and when I see the pits I don't see coal coming out with black smog everywhere. I see a place that gave birth to British democracy, and the emergence of a new type of politics which rejected conservative ideas - rejection of eugenics and tax without representation.
It didn’t happen in the towns and cities then due to the industrial revolution? It wasn’t thanks to Liberals and middle class politicians of the day. I live in a ex salt mining community, like most people in the town I look at them and remember we’ve moved on with no romantic notions at all. They represent the past.
Didn't the entire global banking sector go bust 10 years ago?
Not entirely, but I get your point. What caused that crash? People being lent money who could not afford to pay it back. With anything between 50-80% if companies failing in their first five years (depending on the source) there are definite parallels to draw.
A Labour government would create jobs through a genuine reindustrialisation strategy, that will see 400,000 new jobs in green energy and high technology created.
Bruce has already touched on this, it’s slightly dubious at best, nor does it account for the jobs that would be lost as part of renationalising. If Thames Water is nationalised, does that count as having created a job, even though it’s there? Are private companies that are servicing the current suppliers going to stay in the UK - see the prior discussion about Siemens for example.
You could quite easily revitalise the high street by ensuring that global monopolies like Amazon pay a fair amount of tax, instead of being able to pay less and undercut small retailers.
I don’t disagree that Amazon should pay more tax, in fact I’m amazed that no party has picked up cheap wins here in the taxation of the net - e.g FB advertising people in the U.K. isn’t charged with VAT which seems utterly wrong. If a U.K. consumer is targeted they should have to pay VAT.
Again, using the conservative estimate that 50% of businesses fail there is a reason- most do not supply a product or service that people want.
Most of the renationalisation will be "cost-free" due to the fact that we'd just take them back into public ownership once the terms of the franchise agreements are over.
Except all the privately owned companies that aren’t run by franchise. £170 billion to do that.
Didn't the Labour led post-war government build 1,000,000 new homes in 6 years?.
Wasn’t the country half flattened and have a huge workforce ready to go? Bit different this time.