Current Affairs The Labour Party

[zzr45]

This killing cyclists policy is something I can really get behind. As long as it’s not just another London centric policy I see it being a big vote winner.

 

[Charro]

The torturer's friend knocked down and nearly killed a cyclist and I look bad?

He nearly killed him?

Come on fella. If you’re going to play the ‘imagine if this was Corbyn’ card then don’t use the same tricks yourself.

 

[sageyefc]

Bloody cyclists again, get off the road you menaces.

 

[dead_soft]

The torturer's friend knocked down and nearly killed a cyclist and I look bad?

I know, it's quite a phenomenal turn of events

 

[NilSatisOptimum]

Labour making gains where it needs to and The Tories losing where it can't afford to. Early doors but planning has started with Tory mp northern research group being formed in the former red wall, sensing their gravy train screeching to a holt.

Polling deep dive shows Labour taking first steps towards power

Opposition starting to win over middle aged voters and make up ground in towns and rural seats.

www.politics.co.uk

 

[davek]

Labour making gains where it needs to and The Tories losing where it can't afford to. Early doors but planning has started with Tory mp northern research group being formed in the former red wall, sensing their gravy train screeching to a holt.

Polling deep dive shows Labour taking first steps towards power

Opposition starting to win over middle aged voters and make up ground in towns and rural seats.

www.politics.co.uk

Pathetically small gains against a government that's murdered 60,000 of its own citizens.

 

[davek]

Bottom line: read and weep Labour right wing chimps...

 

[Amw79]

Bottom line: read and weep Labour right wing chimps...


View attachment 106306

What’s the source for that Dave. Have seen it doing the rounds on Twitter, and looks like a cherry picked list of improvements, while ignoring the more critical elements, which found unlawful discrimination?

 

[davek]

What’s the source for that Dave. Have seen it doing the rounds on Twitter, and looks like a cherry picked list of improvements, while ignoring the more critical elements, which found unlawful discrimination?

The bottom line is the bottom line. There was no institutional anti-semitism in the LP under Corbyn.

Basically what we all knew to be true.

The cherry picking is all going on by the "liberal" media.

 

[davek]

Starmer spinning the right wing attack right now.

If he wants all out civil war he can have it.

 

[davek]

Ha Ha Ha.

This clown on his hands and knees.

 

[Amw79]

The bottom line is the bottom line. There was no institutional anti-semitism in the LP under Corbyn.

Basically what we all knew to be true.

The cherry picking is all going on by the "liberal" media.

I asked about the source, do you know where that came from.

Im glad they found no evidence of institutional anti-semitism, that’s certainly a good thing, but looking at the report itself, the exec summary, right at the beginning of the report (page 6) is as below, which acknowledges improvements, but sets out the clear problems it found.

don’t think ignoring the bad bits will help here.

 

[davek]

Starmer wants the traitors of the party who stabbed them in the back and left to return.

Ha Ha Ha.

 

[Charro]

Think it’s a very good speech and he’s addressing what is a massive problem in the labour party and left wing politics across the board.

 

[NilSatisOptimum]

The bottom line is the bottom line. There was no institutional anti-semitism in the LP under Corbyn.

Basically what we all knew to be true.

The cherry picking is all going on by the "liberal" media.

It clearly demonstrates how emotive the debate became over Palestinian and Israel. Some comparisons should never be thrown into debate just to further a point certainly in the professional circles, anyway.