roydo
in memoriam - 1965-2024
So he's @Butters then, just before the letter writing?
I wont lie, someone else was on my mind.
So he's @Butters then, just before the letter writing?
Take Joan Ryan for instance. Calling her a zionist might be within the bounds of what the word means, given her previous statements, but all most people hear is “it’s the left being anti-Semitic again”. She then repeats that and any argument dissolves into the usual mutual slurs.
Thats it really. Like, the bland definition of a Zionist is one who wants to develop and protect a Jewish state, ergo, Israel. So when someone is described as a Zionist, on here or elsewhere, as something that is "bad", or not in a positive way at least, the conclusion one could make is that those using the term disagree with the development and protection of a Jewish state.
Thats it really. Like, the bland definition of a Zionist is one who wants to develop and protect a Jewish state, ergo, Israel. So when someone is described as a Zionist, on here or elsewhere, as something that is "bad", or not in a positive way at least, the conclusion one could make is that those using the term disagree with the development and protection of a Jewish state.
If you added 'in the way it operates and behaves now' and then you're closer.
Or they're against an apartheid state?
Ah ok, I wasn't aware of those and have no truck at all with people criticising the Israeli government, or indeed any government. My problem is using such an inflammatory term that can be taken to refer to an entire faith.
You are both underlining the point I made. Which is the problem I alluded to.
The dictionary definition of a Zionist is as I stated. The protection and development of a Jewish state.
You are then taking your own personal opinions of Israel, and in effect, saying that you are right, and ergo, a Zionist is evil. The whole premise is that your views on Israel are the only ones in town.
Please note, I am not making a point on Israel per ce, more the point why that calling a Labour MP leaving the party as a Zionist, in that its a bad thing, can be construed as anti semetic.
Simply, no.
It's not been "taken as a word", it's a self-applied ideology of the Israeli far right - and they do so with gusto, btw - and it applies also to describe anyone who support their aims to colonise more Arab lands within the currently constitutes state of Israel. It's not a contested word. That's the point.It is a slippery slope, but when a word had been taken over in the way that has people should really look at what effect using it has.
Take Joan Ryan for instance. Calling her a zionist might be within the bounds of what the word means, given her previous statements, but all most people hear is “it’s the left being anti-Semitic again”. She then repeats that and any argument dissolves into the usual mutual slurs.
When people don’t use an easy term to describe her stance, as they did over her initial response to the killings at the border fence, it is a much more effective tactic.
Zionist is also a frequently used slur in the increasingly violent demonstrations in France where antisemitism has boomed.
Based on your opinion of Israel.
Look, I dont really give much of a fig about Israel either way. All I was trying to explain WHY lobbing the tag as being a Zionist at a defecting Labour MP can be seen as an insult. The media, being as they are, will happily attach the tag of anti semetic as a matter of course.
Play the game would be my advice to the LP.
Based on your opinion of Israel.
Look, I dont really give much of a fig about Israel either way. All I was trying to explain WHY lobbing the tag as being a Zionist at a defecting Labour MP can be seen as an insult. The media, being as they are, will happily attach the tag of anti semetic as a matter of course.
Play the game would be my advice to the LP.
anti-semitism hasn't boomed anywhere, it's a cover to prevent criticism of israeli foreign policy and wider influence on Amerikan real-politik.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.