This Corbyn acolyte seems to reflect the views of his followers.
You’ve posted this before right? Don’t particularly agree with not voting but she’s very much entitled to do that and I understand her apathy.
This Corbyn acolyte seems to reflect the views of his followers.
As I say...You’ve posted this before right? Don’t particularly agree with not voting but she’s very much entitled to do that and I understand her apathy.
As I say...
Just as thousands of traditional Labour voters didnt vote for corbyn, leading to the Johnson government, many of whom contribute to this part of the forum. It was entirely their right not to vote or vote elsewhere if they didn’t like what was in front of them.As I say...
It is fundamentally mad though. I mean you would assume a couple of things. Firstly that Labour would be more pliable than the Tories in office, so there would at least be a chance of enacting some of the things you care about. Secondly, there is every indication that this election could kick this incarnation of the Tories into the long grass for some time.Setting aside our unsubtle jibe, this may be problematic for Labour. Eroding your core support is perilous. Even Johnson knew it in 2019 - he was only being 'lent votes' in certain constituencies.
Setting aside our unsubtle jibe, this may be problematic for Labour. Eroding your core support is perilous. Even Johnson knew it in 2019 - he was only being 'lent votes' in certain constituencies.
I see no one on here meeting that description Bruce. No one.It is fundamentally mad though. I mean you would assume a couple of things. Firstly that Labour would be more pliable than the Tories in office, so there would at least be a chance of enacting some of the things you care about. Secondly, there is every indication that this election could kick this incarnation of the Tories into the long grass for some time.
To pass up both of these simply because Starmer isn't Corbyn MkII seems incredibly immature.
Hi mate, keep your eyes peeled for a divisive fruit.I see no one on here meeting that description Bruce. No one.
Anyway, back the broader point, I can't say I particularly agree with the lady in question. However, there does seem to be a growing dissatisfaction with Labour in the base. Agree with them or not, in electoral terms it could be a problem.It is fundamentally mad though. I mean you would assume a couple of things. Firstly that Labour would be more pliable than the Tories in office, so there would at least be a chance of enacting some of the things you care about. Secondly, there is every indication that this election could kick this incarnation of the Tories into the long grass for some time.
To pass up both of these simply because Starmer isn't Corbyn MkII seems incredibly immature.
No, still not sure. Could you give me another clue please?Hi mate, keep your eyes peeled for a divisive fruit.
In certain constituencies the groups she mentioned (granted she's probably not their voice) would be core voters.….i’m not sure that represents ‘core Labour’. Core Labour is centre left, that’s where it wins elections.
I'm sure I've seen a few Labour voters who post on here taking the anything but Starmer line?I see no one on here meeting that description Bruce. No one.
No mate. No idea. You might need to tag them in.I'm sure I've seen a few Labour voters who post on here taking the anything but Starmer line?
Go for it mate, I'm sure you'll find one or twoNo mate. No idea. You might need to tag them in.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.