Indeed, it's just weird. I can understand having the opinions espoused, I'm not a massive Starmer fan myself. But to just daily see davek launch two-footed into Starmer with no provocation (this was before the recent misteps over the Middle East), just shameful behaviour from anyone who isn't a paid-up Tory activist. Perhaps they can claim expenses from CCHQ for their broadband.
And on the point of "Labour have to be more than just not the Tories"... can we try having that discussion after gaining power? The current Tory lot came into power on the back of David Cameron's 'hug a hoodie' soft conservatism, having convinced the population they were no longer the nasty lot they'd been in the 80s. This must have appalled a lot of the further-Right members, but instead of sabotaging Cameron's election chances they just worked away from within the governing party, and now 13 years on we've had a succession of absolute b'stards in the Home Secretary job, with the latest Horror wanting to deport as many people as possible to Rwanda, lock up everyone else on a plague ship and now rip away tents from the homeless. All the while wanting to classify people supporting a cause she doesn't agree with as being on 'hate-marches'.
Labour could do similar - get into power with a face that won't upset the electorate, and then work to move the country Leftwards, replacing Starmer as Leader/PM if needed, and the support was there. But it's too much work to do that, so volunteer Tory activists like davek are happier to have Labour just lose the next election so they can sit and snipe from the sidelines about how great everything would be if they were in charge.