Current Affairs The Far Right

Status
Not open for further replies.
Said it for a while - it's the completely wrong approach to the situation and just hardens the backlash to your cause rather than help it.

Things like BLM are the fuel that white supremacists feed on to grow. And vice versa. The answer isn't to fight fire with fire.

I'm sure people said the same about the original civil rights movement at the time, though.
 
I'm sure people said the same about the original civil rights movement at the time, though.

Probs, but surely they should learn from that? The approach of King evolved on that of Malcolm X; why revert?

If you rise above your niche opposition, you'll win the argument. I understand that it is easier said than done, but that's why acting for change is called a 'struggle'. King understood that - it's not the opposite view you need to crush; it's changing the mindset of the majority who aren't your enemy.
 
Probs, but surely they should learn from that? The approach of King evolved on that of Malcolm X; why revert?

If you rise above your niche opposition, you'll win the argument. I understand that it is easier said than done, but that's why acting for change is called a 'struggle'. King understood that - it's not the opposite view you need to crush; it's changing the mindset of the majority who aren't your enemy.

If not for its panic over Malcolm X and friends, White America would have been perfectly content to ignore Martin Luther King Jr.

Unfortunate, perhaps, but true. Newspapers and magazines from that era are quite revealing, and an instructive counter to the way this time period has since been sanitized and edified for the public memory.

The Soviet Union taking care to humiliate the US over its racism also had an important impact too, particularly on Kennedy. Hard to go around boasting about being the greatest country in the world, the only legitimate model, when diplomats from Ghana complain at the UN that they aren't allowed to buy lunch in DC.
 
Probs, but surely they should learn from that? The approach of King evolved on that of Malcolm X; why revert?

If you rise above your niche opposition, you'll win the argument. I understand that it is easier said than done, but that's why acting for change is called a 'struggle'. King understood that - it's not the opposite view you need to crush; it's changing the mindset of the majority who aren't your enemy.

But you refer to BLM as a 'fuel' for which white supremacists feed on. As far as I'm aware, BLM is a peaceful movement focusing on the rights of blacks people who are marginalised throughout the modern world. How is that fighting fire with fire? It's more Luther King than it is Malcolm X.
 
But you refer to BLM as a 'fuel' for which white supremacists feed on. As far as I'm aware, BLM is a peaceful movement focusing on the rights of blacks people who are marginalised throughout the modern world. How is that fighting fire with fire? It's more Luther King than it is Malcolm X.

I disagree mate sorry. I think there's a violent undercurrent throughout their ideology, and an extreme left political viewpoint underpinning it.

That's why I think it's 'fuel' for white supremacists, as whilst BLM aren't the moral equivalency of them or even anywhere close to it, it's still doing things the wrong way and giving a point of comparison between the two when there should be none whatsoever. In short, the argument of 'moral equivalency' shouldn't just be stupid; it simply shouldn't exist. There shouldn't be two 'sides' to this - there should be a just cause and a bunch of lunatics dismissed out of hand by the everyday American citizenry in the middle ground.
 
How America Spreads the Disease that is Racism by not Confronting Racist Family Members and Friends

As of today, the mother of the murder suspect who killed at least one person in Charlottesville Virginia during a white supremacist rally, told reporters that all she knew the last time she talked to her son, is that he was going to an “Alt-Right” rally. She had no idea her son was a racist — or did she?

Racism is the elephant in the room in America — particularly, white America. White people would like racism to go away. The thought that their ancestors could have been slave owners is an embarrassment to most.

In counseling many white Americans who are against racism, one thing stands out: they are afraid to confront their racist family members and friends. They are against racism, but they also love their family and friends. I am often asked, “April, I don’t know what to do. How do I confront them without upsetting them?”

Racism is complex in scope because it is both a mental illness and a value. In order words, it is a valued, sheltered, and protected mental illness. One might even say it has been incubated and allowed to fester throughout the course of American history.

Mental illnesses are health conditions involving changes in thinking, emotion or behavior (or a combination of these). Racism meets those criteria.

Like all illnesses, it needs to be treated in order for it to be cured. The problem, is that we do not see racism as a problem, because we do not see it for what it is — an infectious disease that has been an epidemic plaguing our nation.

Epidemics can spread rapidly and can be notoriously difficult to treat. In the medical field, the way to stop an epidemic is to educate and involve the general population on what the symptoms are in order to prevent spreading the disease. If the symptoms are not recognized, then the disease spreads and exacerbates. It can and will harm many people over the course of time — which racism has.

The mental illness that is racism has killed thousands of people of color, particularly, African-Americans and Native Americans.

The murders in Charlottesville Virginia would be considered an outbreak of the disease. Without swift and timely containment, it will only further spread and spur new outbreaks.

To prevent the disease, it is important to know the signs. Like many diseases, the symptoms can appear subtly, and if not treated, will get worse and become untreatable.

Review the “Racism Scale: Where do you fall?” below to begin to explore and understand whether or not you have symptoms.


1*L56ZSQq7RQ0YHw0YJ4aucA.jpeg

http://racismscale.weebly.com/
If you fall below “awareness”, then this is a red flag that racism is a problem for you. If it is not a problem for you, but find that it is a problem for your family members and/or friends, then it’s time to address it or it will continue to spread throughout America.

Like alcoholism, an alcoholic cannot thrive without their enablers. It is the same white Americans who enable their relatives and friends who are racist. It is important to identify and recognize that racism is a mental illness and recommend that individual to a psychotherapist as needed.

There is no easy way to contain a disease, but if we can identify the symptoms, then we can put a stop to it through education and awareness.

- April Harter
 
Fixed it for you.

People don't dress us in Klan outfits and wave Nazi flags because of a principled disagreement over the other side's tactics.

You don't understand what I mean by fuel. Not to act - you don't need 'fuel' to do what you describe, you just need to be a complete tosser - but to be able to seek an ounce of justification to do so in the eyes of the majority who aren't them.

I'm not even saying that I agree that should be the way it is, but it definitely is. And that's the real war - not crushing white supremacists, because there's no need to do that through counter-violence if they are drowned out morally by the overwhelming majority.

And that's not me justifying white supremacists - it's not even about Charlottesville. It's about the approach of BLM overall; I simply disagree with the tactics.
 
You don't understand what I mean by fuel. Not to act - you don't need 'fuel' to do what you describe, you just need to be a complete tosser - but to be able to seek an ounce of justification to do so in the eyes of the majority who aren't them.

I'm not even saying that I agree that should be the way it is, but it definitely is. And that's the real war - not crushing white supremacists, because there's no need to do that through counter-violence if they are drowned out morally by the overwhelming majority.

And that's not me justifying white supremacists - it's not even about Charlottesville. It's about the approach of BLM overall; I simply disagree with the tactics.
King stood on the shoulder of Malcolm X.
In the 1920's there was no organized resistance and 50,000 klansmen marched on the capital.
kkk-march-washington-1928-41.jpg

Theres a nasty underbelly to this country and until a statesman like MLK comes along, I'm quite happy that BLM are showing some resistance
 
The president of the United States is now a neo-Nazi sympathiser
Richard Wolffe
Donald Trump’s press conference was a grotesque display of empathy for violent racists. At least it united the Republicans im disgust at their president
Comments
1,109

Contact author

Wednesday 16 August 2017 03.37 BSTFirst published on Wednesday 16 August 2017 03.28 BST

Donald Trump the neo-Nazi sympathizer has achieved what Donald Trump the president has singularly failed to do: unite the nation.

An immensely fractured country – riven by race, class, culture and politics – finds itself transfixed by one grotesque display of empathy for violent racists. These are the same violent racists whom White House aides previously called, in remarks that Trump read out loudly and very carefully: “criminals and thugs.”

But that was so Monday. One short day later, the leader of the nation – that daily proclaims its commitment to liberty and justice for all – declared there were “very fine people” in Charlottesville, who simply joined a neo-Nazi rally to protest about a statue.

“You had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest, and very legally protest – because I don’t know if you know, they had a permit,” Trump helpfully explained to the astonished press corps at Trump Tower. “The other group didn’t have a permit. So I only tell you this: there are two sides to a story.”

Sadly for Trump, there is only one side to the political reaction to his comments: sheer disgust. As an apologist for racist protestors – even though they obtained a precious permit – Trump has magically created a sense of spine in his own Republican party.
https://eb2.3lift.com/pass?tl_click...t=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=
This is something of a biological miracle because people like Marco Rubio, his vanquished former rival – the man he used to deride as little Marco – was previously classified by entomologists as an invertebrate.

“Mr President, you can’t allow #WhiteSupremacists to share only part of blame. They support idea which cost nation & world so much pain,” tweeted the Florida senator. “The #WhiteSupremacy groups will see being assigned only 50% of blame as a win. We can not allow this old evil to be resurrected.”

Marco Rubio(@marcorubio)
Mr. President,you can't allow #WhiteSupremacists to share only part of blame.They support idea which cost nation & world so much pain 5/6

August 15, 2017
Even in the abbreviated hashtag world of tweets, this counts for something. No doubt, Rubio will return to his spineless state when the next vote comes around. No doubt, he and his fellow Republicans in Washington will later excuse the abuse of a nation as the drunken talk of an otherwise good-hearted man.

But at this moment of testing, there is no excuse for standing on the sidelines in silence. Those who speak out deserve some praise for doing the right thing, if only to remember what the right thing looks like next month, when Congress returns.

So mazeltov to Paul Ryan for siding against the anti-Semites like this: “We must be clear. White supremacy is repulsive. This bigotry is counter to all this country stands for. There can be no moral ambiguity.”

Paul Ryan(@SpeakerRyan)
We must be clear. White supremacy is repulsive. This bigotry is counter to all this country stands for. There can be no moral ambiguity.

August 15, 2017
Of course this country also stands for the statues of Confederate generals. In fact, those statues were themselves erected in a concerted effort to resurrect the old evil that Rubio describes.

There’s a reason why so many of them rose up in the 1920s, a generation or more after the Civil War. This was the era when the KKK was reborn, thanks in no small part to the new media of its day: specifically, the moving picture known as The Birth of a Nation.

Those statues were the larger-than-life resurrection of the dead and defeated Confederacy at a time when lynchings were the strange fruit of the south, and the civil rights struggle was led by a relatively new group known as the NAACP.

Those Confederate statues had nothing to do with the statues erected to commemorate the slave-owning founding fathers, as Trump argued on Tuesday.

“So this week it’s Robert E Lee,” complained Trump. “I noticed that Stonewall Jackson is coming down. I wonder, is it George Washington next week? And is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You know, you really do have to ask yourself, where does it stop?”

“You’re changing history,” he added. “You’re changing culture.”

Never mind that these statues themselves were an effort to change history and change culture. Never mind that the culture they represent was an abomination on America’s history and a moral affront to the values enshrined in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

There is no finer expression of the white supremacist mindset than this kind of cultural defense. The so-called citizens’ councils of the 1950s also argued they were just trying to protect their culture from sliding down the slippery slope of civil rights, integrated schools, voting rights and economic opportunity for minorities.

What drives Donald Trump to such extremes? Yes, we know he has a long history of racism: from his belief in the guilt of the Central Park Five to his announcement speech riff about Mexican immigrants as rapists. Yes, we know Ivana Trump said he kept a copy of Hitler’s speeches by his bedside.

But it would be an omission to leave out the driving force of his candidacy and his presidency: his visceral hatred of Barack Obama. Trump has no clear ideology and no clear purpose to his presidency, other than his obsession with overturning everything Obama stood for. His presidential campaign began with a racist lie about Obama’s birth certificate; his presidency continues to smolder with resentment about the enduring life of Obamacare.

As they say on Scandal, and in too many American homes for too long, you have to be twice as good as them to get half of what they have. How it must pain Donald Trump to know that his predecessor was twice as good at everything from inauguration crowds to legislative victories.

Let’s be honest. Trump’s sympathy for neo-Nazis is no more shocking than his [Poor language removed]-grabbing boasts, his continued profiting from the presidency, his coddling of (and alleged collusion with) the Russians and his obvious obstruction of justice by firing the FBI director.

There is, amid all the random tweets and undisciplined press comments, a remarkable consistency to Donald Trump. He is the very man Hillary Clinton warned us that he would be.

How he can continue as commander-in-chief of the world’s most diverse military force is something of a mystery. How he can continue as the leader of a big tent Republican party is inconceivable.

Perhaps the civil rights movement itself holds some lessons of what lies ahead: the moment of most violent white-lash is the moment when civil rights takes its biggest steps forward.

When James Meredith enrolled as the first black student at the segregated University of Mississippi in 1962, there were riots from a white mob, quelled only by federal troops. After a year of studies, racial harassment and protection by US marshals, Meredith graduated in a peaceful commencement ceremony.

Four decades later, Meredith returned to see his son graduate with the top honors from the business school at Ole Miss. He said he was far more proud of his son than he was of his own time there.

For his part in changing its culture and its history, the university made an important statement about Meredith, the man it had so roundly abused: it installed a statue of him striding towards its entrance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top