The Everton Board Thread (Inc. Bill Kenwright / Blue Union)

Is it time for Change...???

  • Kenwright an the Board out, We need Change.

    Votes: 503 80.0%
  • Im Happy with the way thing are. Kenwright an the Board should stay

    Votes: 126 20.0%

  • Total voters
    629
Status
Not open for further replies.
You say you sold out the first batch of amber and blue scarfs - how many was that mate, and how many more have you produced to be sold...and is it the same wording/imagery?

Elstone: “Today is absolutely about us, talking to our fans, updating you on the things that, we believe are important to you...

....What value have the club's owners placed on the club? Well, the simple truth of the matter is that, it is private and confidential...what value is a private matter and a matter for those shareholders."

rolleye0014.gif



150 mate I think we have ordered the same and awaiting confirmation on whether the Liver has been taken off for this batch or not.
 
I'm just wondering,what is the point of this thread? What are we arguing about? Could people possibly go back to base one and state their case,whatever that case maybe. Tell you why I'm confused. I'm not sure if anyone is arguing that Kenwright et al should remain at Goodison for the rest of his natural as owner. So it seems we are bigging up a difference of emphasis of when and how he should leave, and how his time as Chair should be remembered.
 
I'm just wondering,what is the point of this thread? What are we arguing about? Could people possibly go back to base one and state their case,whatever that case maybe. Tell you why I'm confused. I'm not sure if anyone is arguing that Kenwright et al should remain at Goodison for the rest of his natural as owner. So it seems we are bigging up a difference of emphasis of when and how he should leave, and how his time as Chair should be remembered.

It's not possible to 'big up' that debate as it's crucial to the football club.
 
Speaking of Mr X's....

Sports Minister Hugh Robertson is set to act against clubs who's ownership is shrouded in mystery. Using the Leeds ownership situation as an example (some financial entity offshore has shares in Leeds), Robertson says it's not on that fans dont have a clue who controls their own clubs and that's not right.

Bad day at the office for our board of directors. The noose tightens on Everton FC's shadow director, Green, and on the BCR investment vehicle of Scarlett Pimpernel director, Robert Earl.
 
Speaking of Mr X's....

Sports Minister Hugh Robertson is set to act against clubs who's ownership is shrouded in mystery. Using the Leeds ownership situation as an example (some financial entity offshore has shares in Leeds), Robertson says it's not on that fans dont have a clue who controls their own clubs and that's not right.

Bad day at the office for our board of directors. The noose tightens on Everton FC's shadow director, Green, and on the BCR investment vehicle of Scarlett Pimpernel director, Robert Earl.

Davek, its got feck all to do with an MP. It is already an offenace to not declare the true owners of a Prem League club. The alleged exposure of Green was the basis of the Daily Post two being allegedly banned from Finch Farm. Yet we've seen no proof, only conjecture from self serving fans like you. And both reporters continue to report on Everton affairs.

I return to my original question what is the basis of our discussion on this thread?

Is it a forum for you to spout unproven allegations as if they were known truths?

PS No images this time Davek, just another straight question that you'll no doubt choose to swerve. I wonder why?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Davek, its got feck all to do with an MP. It is already an offenace to not declare the true owners of a Prem League club. The alleged exposure of Green was the basis of the Daily Post two being allegedly banned from Finch Farm. Yet we've seen no proof, only conjecture from self serving fans like you. And both reporters continue to report on Everton affairs.

I return to my original question what is the basis of our discussion on this thread?

Is it a forum for you to spout unproven allegations as if they were known truths?

PS No images this time Davek, just another straight question that you'll no doubt choose to swerve. I wonder why?

It's got everything to is do with politics if companies are flouting the law. The Leeds example is a case in point, and I'd expect the kick up the arse today will make sure a name is coughed up by that club. As for Green: his connection with Kenwright and via him Everton is well documented. If there's any suggestion he's acting as a shadow director then that needs investigating.
 
Do you not think that these 2 (green and earl) should be actually doing somethging about our predicament ?
as in putting some money in ?

they easily have the funds, but all they wanted to do in the last window was offload from the wage bill, reducing an already threadbare squad even more.

If they don't want to make us into something then they should hand over to someone that does, for a fair price and not an inflated one.
Earl doesn't give us anything from Vegas, so the losses he is making there at the moment cannot be covered by profit/ divis from Everton.

They are like a couple of zits that have appeared on friday morning with a hot promise in the offing on friday night.
 
It's got everything to is do with politics if companies are flouting the law. The Leeds example is a case in point, and I'd expect the kick up the arse today will make sure a name is coughed up by that club. As for Green: his connection with Kenwright and via him Everton is well documented. If there's any suggestion he's acting as a shadow director then that needs investigating.


Tut tut Dave no Politics!

I do think dealing in conjecture is dangerous business although I don't think such things should beyond discussion as long as it is made clear that we are making educated guesses based on fact rather than stating them as facts in themselves. Of course, if there is evidence that helps prove such things are true then...
 
Do you not think that these 2 (green and earl) should be actually doing somethging about our predicament ?
as in putting some money in ?

they easily have the funds, but all they wanted to do in the last window was offload from the wage bill, reducing an already threadbare squad even more.

If they don't want to make us into something then they should hand over to someone that does, for a fair price and not an inflated one.
Earl doesn't give us anything from Vegas, so the losses he is making there at the moment cannot be covered by profit/ divis from Everton.

They are like a couple of zits that have appeared on friday morning with a hot promise in the offing on friday night.

There are a whole host of board members who could in theory invest in the club, it would be interesting to know why they will not.
 
There are a whole host of board members who could in theory invest in the club, it would be interesting to know why they will not.

really? who? i know one has stated that they will not invest while BK is in charge, apart from tweedle dee and tweedle dumb i cannot think of anyone else with the financial clout to invest.
 
Tut tut Dave no Politics!

I do think dealing in conjecture is dangerous business although I don't think such things should beyond discussion as long as it is made clear that we are making educated guesses based on fact rather than stating them as facts in themselves. Of course, if there is evidence that helps prove such things are true then...

The evidence is buried deep....but it's there.

Ask yourself this one question - where did Bill get the money to pay for his shareholding? he hasn't a pot too piss in, never has
 
There are a whole host of board members who could in theory invest in the club, it would be interesting to know why they will not.

Something to do with how Kenwrong took control I heard, the Moores money safely under lock and key as long as he is at the club, won't buy him out at a profit either so I take that they mean his puppet-masters as well.

so, apart from Grantchester and the '2 bob board members,' who else is wealthy enough to do anything ?
 
It's got everything to is do with politics if companies are flouting the law. The Leeds example is a case in point, and I'd expect the kick up the arse today will make sure a name is coughed up by that club. As for Green: his connection with Kenwright and via him Everton is well documented. If there's any suggestion he's acting as a shadow director then that needs investigating.

Well documented? source, not conjecture. We already know that Kenwright and Green are good mates. Kenwright has said so. Is this your well documented source? We already know that Green facilitated the purchase of Greggs M15 or wikileaks stuff. Its public knowledge.

Also, the law on ownership is a Premier league law, not a criminal offense. So its got nothing to do with him.

Incidentally, I've just heard some of the proceedings with this forthright MP. Asked directly what he would do to reform the FA, like all politicians he started to um and ah. You'd have more chance of Katie Price jumping on you than the MP doing anything significant. And if Green is acting as a shadow Director, we are agreed, it needs investigating. But proof not conjecture would be useful and you have no proof, which the Daily Post two clearly did not have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top