Davek et al seem to have implied as much, so I think it is a fair comment to say that you'd sell to the first bidder as no one has made any suggestions about conditionalities, or any concerns about selling, which is where the debate is about. Its not about the selling itself. I think that others are simply trying to point out the dangers so that perhaps we can find some common ground around the issue.
I think that both you and I know why those idiots wanted to call endless EGM's. Let's not try and dignify it with some intellectual hogwash. It was simply to embarass Kenwright and damage the image of the club. Kenwright has made his position with regards to selling quite clear on a number of occasions. I would have done exactly the same given the same context. If I give my explanation, that's my explanation and I wouldn't change it because someone wants to put words in my mouth.
Unfortunately, due to that idiot, we've all lost out, as I would have preferred an AGM to a "fans conference" as a method of accountability. That said, for Keith Harris to disappear for months on end is unacceptable. While we will never know all the details, silence really does help to fuel the conspiracy theorists.
One of the differences with an investment and a takeover is that with the majority of takeovers I've seen, the manager and board tend to leave the club. With investment, the existing structure may remain, though if Kenwright remained in that context I'd want him to be more like Niall Quin, he fronts the owners but has no real power, except persuasion.
I like Kenwright, to me he has brought some stability. People tend to forget that we are not the club who are not the bookies favourite relegation canddiate. We are an acknowledged top six club. He has managed within the confines he finds himsefl, but clearly he is out of his depth. I have no problem with him being associated with the clubin the future but not enough for him to remain as a majority shareholder in the long run.
, get Mr X in NOW
