Current Affairs The Conservative Party

Status
Not open for further replies.
Award-winning teacher among staff needing charity to scrape by
https://www.theguardian.com/educati...g-teacher-among-staff-needing-charity-poverty

Teacher poverty is now so acute that the Victorian charity helping them is running on its reserves

It was winning a national Teaching Award and getting a pay rise in recognition of her outstanding work that, paradoxically, inflicted the final blow to Sarah Wilson’s* finances and put her under threat of homelessness.

Until last winter, thanks to tax credits, the secondary teacher, a single parent, was just about scraping by. But her circumstances took a surprising turn for the worse when she received a £5,000 salary rise from her school, increasing her monthly take-home pay by £300, in recognition of her Teaching Award – the prestigious annual prizes sponsored by Pearson.

The following month, after being told of Wilson’s increase, the government finally processed a form she had sent in six months earlier and found she was being overpaid in tax credits. In December, she received a “scary” letter stating she owed HMRC £1,000, plus she would not be eligible for any further tax credits and benefits until April.

“Opening that letter was the worst moment I experienced,” she says. “At first, I was more scared than anything else. I sat down and cried. And then I tried to rebudget, and I tried to get help.”

Despite speaking to her MP, her local council and Citizens Advice, she was told little could be done to help her with her living costs while she repaid HMRC.

Trapped between the choice of allowing her family to be made homeless or diving into debt, she desperately tried to cut down food and heating costs. “My priority was to keep my home, which meant I couldn’t afford to have the heating on. I used candles instead of turning on lights. I bought the cheapest and most basic food.”

She says there were days in December when she wondered whether she and her two young children were going to freeze to death or starve.

If she had not prioritised her rent over her food and bills, and eventually begged the charity Education Support Partnership (ESP) for help, “we would probably be homeless now”, she says.

Wilson, 31, and her two children live in the cheapest two-bedroom flat she could find within commuting distance of her school. The children’s father – a full-time student – is exercising his legal right not to contribute to their upkeep.

Rent takes up 78% of her take-home pay, leaving her about £100 a week to live on from a £27,000 annual salary – but 100% of this (£400 a month) has to be spent on childcare to allow her to work full-time. Tax credits were her lifeline.

Wilson did her best to hide what she was doing from her children, aged seven and eight. But one day, they found her crying. “My daughter said to me: Mummy, maybe we can start selling things,” Wilson recalls. “She told me: We can sell my toys. We can sell cakes.”

When a former colleague mentioned the help the ESP offers teachers in dire financial circumstances, Wilson wrote to the charity. It gave her £900 to help cover her December rent, allowing her to pay off HMRC. “I was very relieved and very grateful.”

Wilson’s circumstances are far from exceptional. In fact, she was just one of 248 teachers and education sector workers “deemed to be at risk of homelessness” who last year received an ESP grant to help cover housing costs.

This is a 123% increase since 2014 in the number of housing-cost grants awarded by the charity, the UK’s oldest and largest teachers’ benevolent fund. In the past year alone, there has been a 27% increase in applications from education workers, many of them teachers living in London and the south-east, particularly women in their 30s and 40s with dependent children.

Sinéad Mc Brearty, the head of ESP, says the charity - which has been around for 142 years - is spending its reserves to keep up with the demand for grants, 72% of which relate to housing costs.

“People don’t expect teachers to be homeless, to get the majority of their food from food banks, to live in poverty.” She often reads applications from teachers with children trying to survive on less than £100 a week. “There isn’t a future where teachers will stay living in the south-east in poverty. They will move out or give up teaching. We have a massive recruitment crisis. We have tipped the point where there are more people leaving than there are entering the profession.”

Dawn Martin, 36, teaches English at a secondary school in Berkshire and has two children, aged 10 and 14. She earns £27,000, but after her student loan deduction and tax and pension contributions she takes home just £1,400 a month.

Last year, her landlord increased her monthly rent from £1,185 to £1,250. With just £15 a month left after rent, bills and food already, there was no way Martin and her partner, a stay-at-home dad, could afford the extra £65 – and so the landlord evicted them.

“We had to scramble around to find money for a deposit on a new place,” says Martin. The average rent for a two-bed property in Berkshire is £1,234 a month, according to home.co.uk, and the landlord of the only affordable home they could find was wary of Martin’s low disposable income and asked for four months’ rent as a deposit, plus a month’s rent in advance – £7,000 in all.

“We pretty quickly realised we might be made homeless. We were told by the council that we would be moved to an emergency B&B in another county if we were. We didn’t know how I would get to work or how we would get our children to school. It hit us hard. The children felt ashamed. They didn’t want their friends to know.”

It affected her self-esteem. “I felt like I was letting my children and my partner down, like I wasn’t a good provider.” Like Wilson, Martin feels angry. “It’s the system. You don’t get paid enough. If you have a family, you have to have a partner with a decent wage to make ends meet as a teacher.”
Martin turned to the ESP, which gave her one month’s rent (£1,185). This, combined with their savings, the deposit from their previous rental and an interest-free loan from the council, meant the family was able to put down the huge deposit.

Martin’s partner has now got work as an electrician and their income is much improved. “I’m very grateful to the Education Support Partnership for their support. When they told me we were going to be OK as a family, that we could carry on with our lives, it was such a huge, huge relief.”

Meanwhile, things look better for Wilson, too. She persuaded her school to reduce her salary from £32,000 back to £27,000, after finding, to her disgust, that under the tax credit system she would be better off that way. She still works a 50-hour week but is managing to leave school earlier, cutting her childcare bill to £250 a month.

But she continues to struggle to afford anything that is not essential. “I feel really guilty and sad. But mostly, I feel angry. I worked so hard to qualify as a teacher and get my award. I should be able to support my family.”

*Not her real name



Great steps toward our knowledge-intensive dynamic information-technology disruption innovation outside-the-box hyperglocal Economist-approved unicorn 5G venture capital moonbeam economy of the future!

I'll bet she just isn't aware that it's actually cheaper to cook healthy food.
 
Award-winning teacher among staff needing charity to scrape by
https://www.theguardian.com/educati...g-teacher-among-staff-needing-charity-poverty

Teacher poverty is now so acute that the Victorian charity helping them is running on its reserves

It was winning a national Teaching Award and getting a pay rise in recognition of her outstanding work that, paradoxically, inflicted the final blow to Sarah Wilson’s* finances and put her under threat of homelessness.

Until last winter, thanks to tax credits, the secondary teacher, a single parent, was just about scraping by. But her circumstances took a surprising turn for the worse when she received a £5,000 salary rise from her school, increasing her monthly take-home pay by £300, in recognition of her Teaching Award – the prestigious annual prizes sponsored by Pearson.

The following month, after being told of Wilson’s increase, the government finally processed a form she had sent in six months earlier and found she was being overpaid in tax credits. In December, she received a “scary” letter stating she owed HMRC £1,000, plus she would not be eligible for any further tax credits and benefits until April.

“Opening that letter was the worst moment I experienced,” she says. “At first, I was more scared than anything else. I sat down and cried. And then I tried to rebudget, and I tried to get help.”

Despite speaking to her MP, her local council and Citizens Advice, she was told little could be done to help her with her living costs while she repaid HMRC.

Trapped between the choice of allowing her family to be made homeless or diving into debt, she desperately tried to cut down food and heating costs. “My priority was to keep my home, which meant I couldn’t afford to have the heating on. I used candles instead of turning on lights. I bought the cheapest and most basic food.”

She says there were days in December when she wondered whether she and her two young children were going to freeze to death or starve.

If she had not prioritised her rent over her food and bills, and eventually begged the charity Education Support Partnership (ESP) for help, “we would probably be homeless now”, she says.

Wilson, 31, and her two children live in the cheapest two-bedroom flat she could find within commuting distance of her school. The children’s father – a full-time student – is exercising his legal right not to contribute to their upkeep.

Rent takes up 78% of her take-home pay, leaving her about £100 a week to live on from a £27,000 annual salary – but 100% of this (£400 a month) has to be spent on childcare to allow her to work full-time. Tax credits were her lifeline.

Wilson did her best to hide what she was doing from her children, aged seven and eight. But one day, they found her crying. “My daughter said to me: Mummy, maybe we can start selling things,” Wilson recalls. “She told me: We can sell my toys. We can sell cakes.”

When a former colleague mentioned the help the ESP offers teachers in dire financial circumstances, Wilson wrote to the charity. It gave her £900 to help cover her December rent, allowing her to pay off HMRC. “I was very relieved and very grateful.”

Wilson’s circumstances are far from exceptional. In fact, she was just one of 248 teachers and education sector workers “deemed to be at risk of homelessness” who last year received an ESP grant to help cover housing costs.

This is a 123% increase since 2014 in the number of housing-cost grants awarded by the charity, the UK’s oldest and largest teachers’ benevolent fund. In the past year alone, there has been a 27% increase in applications from education workers, many of them teachers living in London and the south-east, particularly women in their 30s and 40s with dependent children.

Sinéad Mc Brearty, the head of ESP, says the charity - which has been around for 142 years - is spending its reserves to keep up with the demand for grants, 72% of which relate to housing costs.

“People don’t expect teachers to be homeless, to get the majority of their food from food banks, to live in poverty.” She often reads applications from teachers with children trying to survive on less than £100 a week. “There isn’t a future where teachers will stay living in the south-east in poverty. They will move out or give up teaching. We have a massive recruitment crisis. We have tipped the point where there are more people leaving than there are entering the profession.”

Dawn Martin, 36, teaches English at a secondary school in Berkshire and has two children, aged 10 and 14. She earns £27,000, but after her student loan deduction and tax and pension contributions she takes home just £1,400 a month.

Last year, her landlord increased her monthly rent from £1,185 to £1,250. With just £15 a month left after rent, bills and food already, there was no way Martin and her partner, a stay-at-home dad, could afford the extra £65 – and so the landlord evicted them.

“We had to scramble around to find money for a deposit on a new place,” says Martin. The average rent for a two-bed property in Berkshire is £1,234 a month, according to home.co.uk, and the landlord of the only affordable home they could find was wary of Martin’s low disposable income and asked for four months’ rent as a deposit, plus a month’s rent in advance – £7,000 in all.

“We pretty quickly realised we might be made homeless. We were told by the council that we would be moved to an emergency B&B in another county if we were. We didn’t know how I would get to work or how we would get our children to school. It hit us hard. The children felt ashamed. They didn’t want their friends to know.”

It affected her self-esteem. “I felt like I was letting my children and my partner down, like I wasn’t a good provider.” Like Wilson, Martin feels angry. “It’s the system. You don’t get paid enough. If you have a family, you have to have a partner with a decent wage to make ends meet as a teacher.”
Martin turned to the ESP, which gave her one month’s rent (£1,185). This, combined with their savings, the deposit from their previous rental and an interest-free loan from the council, meant the family was able to put down the huge deposit.

Martin’s partner has now got work as an electrician and their income is much improved. “I’m very grateful to the Education Support Partnership for their support. When they told me we were going to be OK as a family, that we could carry on with our lives, it was such a huge, huge relief.”

Meanwhile, things look better for Wilson, too. She persuaded her school to reduce her salary from £32,000 back to £27,000, after finding, to her disgust, that under the tax credit system she would be better off that way. She still works a 50-hour week but is managing to leave school earlier, cutting her childcare bill to £250 a month.

But she continues to struggle to afford anything that is not essential. “I feel really guilty and sad. But mostly, I feel angry. I worked so hard to qualify as a teacher and get my award. I should be able to support my family.”

*Not her real name



Great steps toward our knowledge-intensive dynamic information-technology disruption innovation outside-the-box hyperglocal Economist-approved unicorn 5G venture capital moonbeam economy of the future!

I'll bet she just isn't aware that it's actually cheaper to cook healthy food.
You would think that the job of government is to look after the nations health, safety and education.

On every single count this absolute shower are failing. You might argue that that they had to recover the economy financially, so had cuts enforced, but they missed every single target they set on the economy and have now decided that global factors actually do play a part in UK finance.

But 'cuts, cuts, cuts...less public sector, more private sector....oh that's not working?!?...well then more cuts!'
 
I'll bet she just isn't aware that it's actually cheaper to cook healthy food.

Nah, in that instance it's cheaper to put a condom on until you can afford kids ;) I don't really know what people expect. If I stopped working (as all of the fathers in your story seem to be) and we tried to have two kids on a (also award winning - which in reality means bugger all) nurses salary in London it'd be impossible too. Is this a surprise now?

As it is, these roles are with your ever wonderful 'state is best' employer, yet they pay people a pittance. It looks to me like the state is a rubbish employer, so maybe by your logic they'd be better off having a non-state employer? Of course, such logic is overly simplistic and doesn't really help, but when there's a narrative to push...
 
Nah, in that instance it's cheaper to put a condom on until you can afford kids ;) I don't really know what people expect. If I stopped working (as all of the fathers in your story seem to be) and we tried to have two kids on a (also award winning - which in reality means bugger all) nurses salary in London it'd be impossible too. Is this a surprise now?

As it is, these roles are with your ever wonderful 'state is best' employer, yet they pay people a pittance. It looks to me like the state is a rubbish employer, so maybe by your logic they'd be better off having a non-state employer? Of course, such logic is overly simplistic and doesn't really help, but when there's a narrative to push...

and what do you expect the future of the public service to look like, if working there effectively means dying alone or in poverty?

you sound like one those oxbridge types I just mentioned in the EU thread... ; )
 
and what do you expect the future of the public service to look like, if working there effectively means dying alone or in poverty?

you sound like one those oxbridge types I just mentioned in the EU thread... ; )

Why is this news? A nurse typically earns between 25-30k a year, even in London with weighting, so if they were single (or a single earner) how could they afford to have a family or buy a house? I'd imagine it would be very difficult, if not impossible, but that has been the case for years now. To suggest that's a case of 'dying alone or in poverty' is a bit melodramatic though.
 
To suggest that's a case of 'dying alone or in poverty' is a bit melodramatic though.

well, you have just literally stated that nobody who works in the public sector should expect to be able to afford children, and as the article shows, if you read it, poverty is not at all a melodramatic description
 
this conversation is the liberal equivalent of Stalinists shouting until they're hoarse that the 5 Year Plan is working
 
doesn't seem to be a problem in all the countries that perform far better than the UK in education...

If you have data on what teachers are paid around the world in relation to the cost of living in those countries then by all means share it and I'll gladly receive it. Until that point however, perhaps keep the Stalin comments on the tip of your fingers.

Even if the UK does pay teachers badly in such comparisons however, you seem to be advocating that people willingly live beyond their means just so they can then complain about the unfairness of it all when they get into strife. By all means berate what teachers are paid, but for you as an individual, that doesn't seem especially logical to me.
 
Dawn Martin, 36, teaches English at a secondary school in Berkshire and has two children, aged 10 and 14. She earns £27,000, but after her student loan deduction and tax and pension contributions she takes home just £1,400 a month.

Last year, her landlord increased her monthly rent from £1,185 to £1,250. With just £15 a month left after rent, bills and food already, there was no way Martin and her partner, a stay-at-home dad, could afford the extra £65 – and so the landlord evicted them.

“We had to scramble around to find money for a deposit on a new place,” says Martin. The average rent for a two-bed property in Berkshire is £1,234 a month, according to home.co.uk, and the landlord of the only affordable home they could find was wary of Martin’s low disposable income and asked for four months’ rent as a deposit, plus a month’s rent in advance – £7,000 in all.
How? That doesn't seem right at all. She must be paying a shedload in to her pension for that to be the case.

Telling that the Dad got a job and things got better. If only there was some correlation that could be drawn here..

What that article does do is show the absolute mess consecutive governments failure to build homes is having.
 
Last edited:
How? That doesn't seem right at all. She must be paying a shedload in to her pension for that to be the case. Maybe stay at home Dad could get a job.

About £1,700 according to the PAYE calculator, but who knows. Equally, we don't know why the bloke couldn't get a job whilst his two kids are at school, but the answer is most definitely more government. That's the only certainty. Equally, a very quick search on Rightmove found 406 2-bed properties for under £1,000 a month in Berkshire, but again, the answer is most definitely more government.

As an aside, the article portrays the landlord as the usual money grabbing toe rag, but pretty much any private rental service will request a credit check of the potential tenant to assess their ability to pay the rent. You know, the kind of thing that didn't get done when the banks lent money to any Tom, Dick or Harry and were widely chastised for it. Those checks are fairly standard, and based upon the metric used, that lady would be able to afford a rent of £900 per month, not £1,200. So she's either living beyond her means or her partner has to chip in some.
 
About £1,700 according to the PAYE calculator, but who knows. Equally, we don't know why the bloke couldn't get a job whilst his two kids are at school, but the answer is most definitely more government. That's the only certainty. Equally, a very quick search on Rightmove found 406 2-bed properties for under £1,000 a month in Berkshire, but again, the answer is most definitely more government.

As an aside, the article portrays the landlord as the usual money grabbing toe rag, but pretty much any private rental service will request a credit check of the potential tenant to assess their ability to pay the rent. You know, the kind of thing that didn't get done when the banks lent money to any Tom, [Poor language removed] or Harry and were widely chastised for it. Those checks are fairly standard, and based upon the metric used, that lady would be able to afford a rent of £900 per month, not £1,200. So she's either living beyond her means or her partner has to chip in some.
Yeah it's a very odd one. There's plenty of homes under £1200, arguably there should be more, there's a lot more than meets the eye in both of the cases quoted in that piece. As you pointed out before there seems to be a level of personal responsibility missing in both examples, whether that's being aware of who you're having kids with, the changes in Tax code and associated effects that can occur and living within ones means.

Both seem to put themselves on a pedestal - “It’s the system. You don’t get paid enough. If you have a family, you have to have a partner with a decent wage to make ends meet as a teacher.” - It's not exactly a situation unique to teachers, is it?
 
Award-winning teacher among staff needing charity to scrape by
https://www.theguardian.com/educati...g-teacher-among-staff-needing-charity-poverty

Teacher poverty is now so acute that the Victorian charity helping them is running on its reserves

It was winning a national Teaching Award and getting a pay rise in recognition of her outstanding work that, paradoxically, inflicted the final blow to Sarah Wilson’s* finances and put her under threat of homelessness.

Until last winter, thanks to tax credits, the secondary teacher, a single parent, was just about scraping by. But her circumstances took a surprising turn for the worse when she received a £5,000 salary rise from her school, increasing her monthly take-home pay by £300, in recognition of her Teaching Award – the prestigious annual prizes sponsored by Pearson.

The following month, after being told of Wilson’s increase, the government finally processed a form she had sent in six months earlier and found she was being overpaid in tax credits. In December, she received a “scary” letter stating she owed HMRC £1,000, plus she would not be eligible for any further tax credits and benefits until April.

“Opening that letter was the worst moment I experienced,” she says. “At first, I was more scared than anything else. I sat down and cried. And then I tried to rebudget, and I tried to get help.”

Despite speaking to her MP, her local council and Citizens Advice, she was told little could be done to help her with her living costs while she repaid HMRC.

Trapped between the choice of allowing her family to be made homeless or diving into debt, she desperately tried to cut down food and heating costs. “My priority was to keep my home, which meant I couldn’t afford to have the heating on. I used candles instead of turning on lights. I bought the cheapest and most basic food.”

She says there were days in December when she wondered whether she and her two young children were going to freeze to death or starve.

If she had not prioritised her rent over her food and bills, and eventually begged the charity Education Support Partnership (ESP) for help, “we would probably be homeless now”, she says.

Wilson, 31, and her two children live in the cheapest two-bedroom flat she could find within commuting distance of her school. The children’s father – a full-time student – is exercising his legal right not to contribute to their upkeep.

Rent takes up 78% of her take-home pay, leaving her about £100 a week to live on from a £27,000 annual salary – but 100% of this (£400 a month) has to be spent on childcare to allow her to work full-time. Tax credits were her lifeline.

Wilson did her best to hide what she was doing from her children, aged seven and eight. But one day, they found her crying. “My daughter said to me: Mummy, maybe we can start selling things,” Wilson recalls. “She told me: We can sell my toys. We can sell cakes.”

When a former colleague mentioned the help the ESP offers teachers in dire financial circumstances, Wilson wrote to the charity. It gave her £900 to help cover her December rent, allowing her to pay off HMRC. “I was very relieved and very grateful.”

Wilson’s circumstances are far from exceptional. In fact, she was just one of 248 teachers and education sector workers “deemed to be at risk of homelessness” who last year received an ESP grant to help cover housing costs.

This is a 123% increase since 2014 in the number of housing-cost grants awarded by the charity, the UK’s oldest and largest teachers’ benevolent fund. In the past year alone, there has been a 27% increase in applications from education workers, many of them teachers living in London and the south-east, particularly women in their 30s and 40s with dependent children.

Sinéad Mc Brearty, the head of ESP, says the charity - which has been around for 142 years - is spending its reserves to keep up with the demand for grants, 72% of which relate to housing costs.

“People don’t expect teachers to be homeless, to get the majority of their food from food banks, to live in poverty.” She often reads applications from teachers with children trying to survive on less than £100 a week. “There isn’t a future where teachers will stay living in the south-east in poverty. They will move out or give up teaching. We have a massive recruitment crisis. We have tipped the point where there are more people leaving than there are entering the profession.”

Dawn Martin, 36, teaches English at a secondary school in Berkshire and has two children, aged 10 and 14. She earns £27,000, but after her student loan deduction and tax and pension contributions she takes home just £1,400 a month.

Last year, her landlord increased her monthly rent from £1,185 to £1,250. With just £15 a month left after rent, bills and food already, there was no way Martin and her partner, a stay-at-home dad, could afford the extra £65 – and so the landlord evicted them.

“We had to scramble around to find money for a deposit on a new place,” says Martin. The average rent for a two-bed property in Berkshire is £1,234 a month, according to home.co.uk, and the landlord of the only affordable home they could find was wary of Martin’s low disposable income and asked for four months’ rent as a deposit, plus a month’s rent in advance – £7,000 in all.

“We pretty quickly realised we might be made homeless. We were told by the council that we would be moved to an emergency B&B in another county if we were. We didn’t know how I would get to work or how we would get our children to school. It hit us hard. The children felt ashamed. They didn’t want their friends to know.”

It affected her self-esteem. “I felt like I was letting my children and my partner down, like I wasn’t a good provider.” Like Wilson, Martin feels angry. “It’s the system. You don’t get paid enough. If you have a family, you have to have a partner with a decent wage to make ends meet as a teacher.”
Martin turned to the ESP, which gave her one month’s rent (£1,185). This, combined with their savings, the deposit from their previous rental and an interest-free loan from the council, meant the family was able to put down the huge deposit.

Martin’s partner has now got work as an electrician and their income is much improved. “I’m very grateful to the Education Support Partnership for their support. When they told me we were going to be OK as a family, that we could carry on with our lives, it was such a huge, huge relief.”

Meanwhile, things look better for Wilson, too. She persuaded her school to reduce her salary from £32,000 back to £27,000, after finding, to her disgust, that under the tax credit system she would be better off that way. She still works a 50-hour week but is managing to leave school earlier, cutting her childcare bill to £250 a month.

But she continues to struggle to afford anything that is not essential. “I feel really guilty and sad. But mostly, I feel angry. I worked so hard to qualify as a teacher and get my award. I should be able to support my family.”

*Not her real name



Great steps toward our knowledge-intensive dynamic information-technology disruption innovation outside-the-box hyperglocal Economist-approved unicorn 5G venture capital moonbeam economy of the future!

I'll bet she just isn't aware that it's actually cheaper to cook healthy food.

I feel for the woman in the first case with the Dad not contributing.

The "stay-at-home Dad" in the second example needs to be a man and support his family.
 
The increase in knife crime and other serious crimes, 450.000 burglaries and only 8% conviction, the mess the now part private probation service is in, and what was once called prisons. The Conservative party is no longer the party of law and order. It's the party of we don't care about law order, we are in our gated communities party.

About £1,700 according to the PAYE calculator, but who knows. Equally, we don't know why the bloke couldn't get a job whilst his two kids are at school, but the answer is most definitely more government. That's the only certainty. Equally, a very quick search on Rightmove found 406 2-bed properties for under £1,000 a month in Berkshire, but again, the answer is most definitely more government.
It's not that simple to just up and move a young family the way schools and there catchment areas are now days. I suppose it does not matter if you paying schools fees, catchment, travel cost will be of little concern.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top