Yes as that comparison holds up...
I look forward to seeing guerilla insurgents in Georgia hiding out in caves in the middle of the wilderness somehow.
It unironically does hold up.
you cannot control an entire country and its people with tanks, jets and drones or any of these things you think trumps citizen ownerships of firearms.
A fighter jet/drone cannot stand on street corners and enforce 'no assembly' edicts. A fighter jet cannot kick down your door at 3AM to search your house for contraband.
None of these things can maintain the needed police state to completely subjugate and enslave the people of a nation. Those weapons are for destroying large areas and many people at once or fighting other state militaries. The government does not want to kill all its people and blow up its own infrastructure as these are the very things they need if they want power.
Police are needed to maintain a police state, boots on the ground and no matter how many police you have they will always be outnumbered by the people which is why in a police state it is vital the police have automatic weapons while the people have [Poor language removed] all.
But when every random pedestrian could have a glock in their waistband or every home owner an AR-15 all of that goes out of the window as they now face the reality of bullets coming back at them.
Look at every insurgency that the US military has tried to destroy, they're all still kicking about with nothing but AK-47s, pick up trucks and IEDs because these big military monsters are useless at dealing with them.