Current Affairs The Andrew Tate thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yarrgh said:
So let's get this right.

Man and dinosaurs around at the same time but now not. At what point did they exit the stage and why?

I keep coming up with Noah being a bit of a tit and letting them perish rather than get on his precious ark.

So pre-Noah, yes but post-Noah no is now my hypothesis. So perhaps Moses could have perhaps had a pet pterodactyl and so forth, but Jesus would have been goosed on the dinosaurs thing.
Click to expand...
I did not, have sexual relations, with that Velociraptor
 
Yarrgh said:
So let's get this right.

Man and dinosaurs around at the same time but now not. At what point did they exit the stage and why?

I keep coming up with Noah being a bit of a tit and letting them perish rather than get on his precious ark.

So pre-Noah, yes but post-Noah no is now my hypothesis. So perhaps Moses could have perhaps had a pet pterodactyl and so forth, but Jesus would have been goosed on the dinosaurs thing.
Click to expand...
moses would have split the seas and had them all doing laps. surely youve had this explained previous.
 
chrismpw said:
My missus was rushing me out of the door earlier, but now I can address the creator you so raised.
The surface rocks are derived from the weathering products of known minerals found in the two chief rock types that firm the earth's crust which underlie every but if land and ocean sediment - granite and basalt. The weathering mechanisms are well understood and are chemical reactions that can be observed and repeated in laboratory conditions. What is more we can model fairly precisely how long these weathering reactions take given the conditions present in the environment.

The science of how the minerals are present is also well understood- as is how the atoms that make them are made as a series of fusion reactions combining hydrogen, the simplest element into atoms as big as carbon in stars. The atoms are then built into bigger atoms at the tremendous heat and pressures present in supernovae. As well as models, these mechanisms have been demonstrated and reproduced in laboratories and can even be observed using the specra emitted from distant supernovae. So the creation of every spec if dust on our planet is traced back to exploding stars that assembled the elements that went on to coalesce as our entire solar system.

These processes are well, if not entirely perfectly understood. Science is still learning as it amasses more data, improving the ideas, explanations and models. This contrasts with religion the beliefs of which are static and the truth of which deteriorates with time and every translation or interpretation of an old story.

The very "act of creation" of the universe cannot yet be explained by science, because the data becomes more sketchy as we look further back. Where the energy came from for the big bang (or technically more accurately the big flash since at the beginning there was only energy - no matter, no atoms existed which would have been necessary to transmit sound!) nobody yet knows. However, the idea that some deity created what all of our scientific understanding states cannot be created or destroyed - energy - is even less believable a speculation than even the most tenuous scientific proposals. Most likely in my view our universe is a tiny part of a sequence of bang, collapse, bang, collapse etc ... but quite how that all started is anybody's guess and we will in all likelihood never know for sure. What is sure however, is that science will never dream up an institution that becomes enormously wealthy having fabricated a story without evidence to draw in believers every week on the basis of handing around a collection plate under the threat of some eternal damnation if they don't.

Apart from big pharma. But that's business not science's fault.
Click to expand...
What prophecies have come true? I think the biggest prophecies coming true are the ones predicting the end times, and what is happening in our world now. Things like sexual promiscuity/immorality, abortions, rise of atheism, rise in liberal ideas and so on becoming more and more common and accepted in our society.

I think what people like you and a lot of other people who have devoted their time into science, need to understand that the creator of this universe is able to call all the shots in how we perceive the world to be or how it existed and so on. What humans need to also realize is that scientific findings cannot be the absolute truth either. Nobody actually knows the actual truth of how the universe came about. You can compile the best scientific data, models, research and you still wouldn't be able to convince people that science has the definitive 100% truth. Only the creator has the truth so for most people, it's much easier to put all your faith into the creator rather than humans with their "trial and error" studies.
 
verreauxi said:
There is no debate as to the age of the earth (4K old versus 4.5 billion years old) or whether humans coexisted with dinosaurs. It’s a matter of settled science versus ignorance.
Click to expand...
There's no debate yet around 40% of Americans believe that dinosaurs coexisted with humans.
 
emir said:
What prophecies have come true? I think the biggest prophecies coming true are the ones predicting the end times, and what is happening in our world now. Things like sexual promiscuity/immorality, abortions, rise of atheism, rise in liberal ideas and so on becoming more and more common and accepted in our society.

I think what people like you and a lot of other people who have devoted their time into science, need to understand that the creator of this universe is able to call all the shots in how we perceive the world to be or how it existed and so on. What humans need to also realize is that scientific findings cannot be the absolute truth either. Nobody actually knows the actual truth of how the universe came about. You can compile the best scientific data, models, research and you still wouldn't be able to convince people that science has the definitive 100% truth. Only the creator has the truth so for most people, it's much easier to put all your faith into the creator rather than humans with their "trial and error" studies.
Click to expand...
Sweet baby Jesus.
 
emir said:
There's no debate yet around 40% of Americans believe that dinosaurs coexisted with humans.
Click to expand...
40% of either uneducated or willfully ignorant Americans; and there's a difference between the two. You are in the latter category.

But back to my question: if a woman is caught committing adultery (and she is 100% is guilty) should she be put to death as indicated in Leviticus?
verreauxi said:
Should she be put to death? Just wondering, since Leviticus says this, and the bible is a book you seem to believe in. Or are you a New Testament follower only?
Click to expand...
 
verreauxi said:
40% of either uneducated or willfully ignorant Americans; and there's a difference between the two. You are in the latter category.

But back to my question: if a woman is caught committing adultery (and she is 100% is guilty) should she be put to death as indicated in Leviticus?
Click to expand...
No I don't believe she should be put to death, not at all. I prefer the new Testament yes.

Do you know anybody in real life who believes in stoning women for adultery?
 
LostLegend said:
That's a self defeating argument.

If you are trying to imply that everything must owe it's origins to a creator, you can't then say that the creator wasn't 'created'
Click to expand...
My original post "Remember that there is a creator for everything on this Earth."

I don't think I've contradicted myself at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top