You completely ignored my last post tho. The Paris accords are too extreme for them. Lessening dependencies on fossil fuels and investing in renewable energies is too extreme. Asking for people to be treated fairly under the same laws is too extreme for them. We should be afraid to either get back in to these things or try to help more people because it's too much too fast for them? That's insane.Think of it this way.
A car going from 0-100mph in 10 seconds isn't going to be able to hit the breaks when it reaches it's destination and could slam into a wall. That's akin to "swinging the dial" too far at once.
If a car goes at a steady pace instead, it can arrive and park safely without hitting that wall.
My point is if you tried to take the whole lot right now, right away, you "hit that brick wall", because you encourage the rise of what led to Trump in the first place and it risks repeating history in 4-8 years. If you take 8 years to wash away Trumpism, you do it properly and sustainably.
If that makes me "mad", so be it. But yes, I fully believe what I'm saying here is sensible, because it takes into account what has happened and, critically, is an attempt to ensure it doesn't happen again. Trump just got one of the highest levels of electoral vote ever; that base isn't going to go away easily, it needs to be gradually eroded.
Your idea that "you need to take things slow" is sound when it's a radical idea. Not when it's simply trying to get back to where you bloody were 4 years ago.
