Current Affairs The 2020 United States Presidential Election

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not even close

Pardon my ignorance, what is the longest running democracy on earth then? All that have had democracies longer had been interrupted by some from of authoritarian government.

I could be wrong, really interested perhaps it's one of those things schools always got wrong.
 
Always thought if Romney would’ve decided to run in 2016 he might’ve beat Trump. How different the world might be.
He should have, and I wish he had. I look back on his and Obama’s debates fondly as it was the last time we got to see two grown ups have a debate.

That said I don’t know if he could have won in 16. Logic was not ruling the day (and sadly things have only gotten worse).
 
he'd never have - like McCain, he was a man for the wrong time politically
Probably right but at the time it seemed like he would’ve at least challenged and maybe changed the game. He had the name, experience, and wherewithal to actually stand up to Trump. In addition he can actually think and react rather than what we saw from Rubio and co who crumbled whenever they had to go off script. A lot wanted him to get in the race when it first looked like Trump was actually in with a chance.
 
So if Twitter was ran by a MAGA supporter and decided tomorrow to ban Bernie Sanders, that'd be fine right because it's a private company?

The impact on societal discourse doesn't matter, right?

Because that's the problem. What you describe in the movie theater are laws. Twitter didn't delete Trumps tweets because of laws; they did so because of a ToS that they arbitrarily enforce based on public interest. They aren't the same thing, and that is indeed my whole point - that Twitter is regulated like any other private company when the impact of the platform is akin to things usually covered by other points of law.

Twitter deleted Trump's tweets after someone was killed, what he said was further inciting it. They deleted his tweets after the building was stormed.

It wasn't preemptive. Either twitter doesn't matter as much as you think or they basically let this go guy as far as possible.
 
So if Twitter was ran by a MAGA supporter and decided tomorrow to ban Bernie Sanders, that'd be fine right because it's a private company?

The impact on societal discourse doesn't matter, right?

Because that's the problem. What you describe in the movie theater are laws. Twitter didn't delete Trumps tweets because of laws; they did so because of a ToS that they arbitrarily enforce based on public interest. They aren't the same thing, and that is indeed my whole point - that Twitter is regulated like any other private company when the impact of the platform is akin to things usually covered by other points of law.
Imagine being mad about twitter right now.
 
Twitter deleted Trump's tweets after someone was killed, what he said was further inciting it. They deleted his tweets after the building was stormed.

It wasn't preemptive. Either twitter doesn't matter as much as you think or they basically let this go guy as far as possible.

Trump has incited violence before, he's spouted thousands of damaging untruths, he praised "good and bad people on both sides" when people had been hurt and killed before... and yet they had never deleted a tweet before or suspended him.

It was, by their own admission, an arbitrary decision, as they had gone with the public interest before that.

No law compelled them to do so in any direction. That for me is the issue, because of how that platform can (potentially) influence elections, topple governments etc. etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top