Toffeelover
Player Valuation: £80m
If there was ever any proof needed that a leader needs presence...
A leader who took us into two wars on the back of lies, Is that the kind of leader the country wants?
If there was ever any proof needed that a leader needs presence...
...not a minor importance to UKIP: they want it straight away and would make it a priority for any new government.Dear oh dear, it is only two years away!!!!!! What else of minor importance do you want to pin your flag to?
Cameron's word was that there would be attempts to amend the treaty more to our benefit
PS Many years ago if you remember Brown said we could have a referendum on the new EU treaty if it had changed. All the other EU leaders signed but Brown delayed, later he quietly zipped off to Lisbon and signed it there. Came back and stated there was not a significant change so no need for a vote. If there was little change why was it necessary to act like he did.
http://www.stv.tv/ Starting in a minute.
Scottish ITV live leaders debate (you need to join it first like).

It's tough supporting Labour. We know the parties' limitation. We all understand how further to the right the party have drifted, and also how it had to be done for them to be recognised as a party. It's difficult to support a party who admit they will make cuts because that's what the public want to hear. But, and I think it's very important, there is a massive difference between Labour and the Tories - compassion.
...not a minor importance to UKIP: they want it straight away and would make it a priority for any new government.
What's insignificant to you is a deal breaker for Farage, because he knows how the Tories would drag matters out...and probably beyond 2017.
A leader who took us into two wars on the back of lies, Is that the kind of leader the country wants?
Dear oh dear, it is only two years away!!!!!! What else of minor importance do you want to pin your flag to?
Cameron's word was that there would be attempts to amend the treaty more to our benefit
PS Many years ago if you remember Brown said we could have a referendum on the new EU treaty if it had changed. All the other EU leaders signed but Brown delayed, later he quietly zipped off to Lisbon and signed it there. Came back and stated there was not a significant change so no need for a vote. If there was little change why was it necessary to act like he did.
I'm not sure how you inferred that i want Blair based on what i said. Stop looking for things that don't exist.
You're a bit mixed up. In 2005, Labour put a referendum promise in their manifesto for the 2004 treaty. However, France and the Netherlands refused to sign it so it was scrapped. Gordon Brown signed a different, re-written treaty in Lisbon. It was delayed because he was put in front of a committee in the UK which he had to attend, hence not being there to sign the treaty and signing it late.
Maybe I got hold of the wrong end of the stick but you were saying if there is any proof that a leader needs presence which for was implying that none of the current potentials had what it takes.
Aye but he did duck out of a vote.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.