There seems to be an assumption that the government used chemicals on it's own people,is that for sure ?.there seems to be a rebel army who have appeared on the streets with guns and some serious armoury to take on their own government,Sure the layman didn't find these weapons in their sheds or at the bottom of their garden did they,someone wants the Syrian government to fall.
I have no proof or information surrounding the atrocities that have happened over in Syria other than the fact it seems civillians have died in a chemical attack,who is to say the rebel army didn't do it.crazy notion isn't it ?.their not winning their battles,the rest of the world aren't exactly jumping in to help them overthrow their government,how do they galvanise support from the world,and what price might they pay to achieve their aims .
Before Cameron, Haige and the cronies send more British troops thousands of miles to fight in a war "a la Blair" style,has anyone asked why we're so keen to do that ??,there's united nations,a collective force from around the world could be pulled together ,but no,we'll be told that it's imperative we do action now ,without support. though this war has been going on for a long time now.
Why do we always without fail jump when USA ask us to,every time,Oh we'll get some spiel from Obama about the special bond between our two countries,Cameron will look like a love sick puppy on the words of the speech,and we'll do whatever they want.
don't remember them coming on board with us over the Falklands though,sat on the fence there alright !!!.
I don't want to offend posters on the forum,if I have than I apologise,I get a wee bit annoyed at how easily we believe what we're told.would like to know the facts and go through legal and international channels before we commit more troops to fight and possibly die in countries while other nations go about their business.
