Her bold statement contrasted with the station's usual coverage of the Ukrainian crisis, which broadly reflects Moscow’s position.
In its reports it has described new Ukranian prime minister Arseny Yatseniuk as "self-imposed" and is sympathetic to the Russian-backed ousted president Viktor Yanukovych.
Miss Martin, who has previously labelled the US government's version of 9/11 as "propaganda", criticised the coverage of the escalating crisis from all sides of the media spectrum as "disappointing.. and rife with misinformation".
But even a dummy like Martin understands that the Crimean invasion is wrong.
So here's the epilogue. Here's what Russia Today says about her off-message messaging:
"We respect her views, and the views of all our journalists, presenters and program hosts, and there will be absolutely no reprimands made against Ms. Martin. "In her comment Ms. Martin also noted that she does not possess a deep knowledge of reality of the situation in Crimea. As such we’ll be sending her to Crimea to give her an opportunity to make up her own mind from the epicentre of the story."
Miss Martin however told the Telegraph: "I am not going to Crimea despite the statement RT has made."
Your grasping at straws now mate, a bold statement by her? really? in fact its typical of the ill informed and idiotic things she has a reputation for saying, such as her opinions which you quote on 9/11 and the US version being nothing but propaganda, talk about only seeing things you wish to see, this is a clear example of that, your sat their believing every word of someone you described as a dummy says over a matter she herself in her statement said she didn't understand and had no knowledge about?
Yatseniuk was not elected as president, therefore he was not chosen by the people, appointing a leader isn't exactly democratic now is it?
Finally the reporter shows her utter lack of any credibility when given the chance to actually go to the region and get a understanding of the situation she had admitted she was speaking about with no knowledge, this she refused, thus showing she is happy to sit their with her 15 minutes of fame being lauded over my the American media no doubt for being some form of journalistic peer of excellence and honesty. Fact is the woman is a loud mouthed clown who isn't fit to call herself a journalist, no journalist worth their salt would make a statement on a situation they had no understanding off.
She basically to all intents and purposes said 'WAR IS BAD' on air like some high-school girl on a peace march
Oh and here ya go, heres who you think speaks the truth about the Ukraine from her 2008 video whilst on a 'truth march' about 9/11, enjoy
P.S. she's also American which makes the entire situation about ignorance all the more amusing, 'ill informed American reporter criticizes Russia'