I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God
Ffrom wiki! close enough..
You got the quote correct, but I don't think it applies to the claim you're making. That's what I meant, although to suggest you misrepresented it also implies intent, which I do not think is part of the case. I simply think you've got this wrong.
Here is what @
TX Bill wrote
...as are the constant references on this forum to the being wealthy is somehow unlawful or immoral. You can't have your cake and eat it too Stevon.
But...for those who want to really understand wealth disparity:
http://paulgraham.com/gap.html
Tex makes a few claims here. As I understand them,
1. Some are making the claim that wealth is immoral and poverty, likewise, is moral
2. There is no direct relationship between wealth and morality (i.e., there is no direct cause, even if it may be argued there is correlation)
'its easier for a camel to get through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven'
or words to that effect...
3. You refute Tex's claim
4. I can't tell if you're supporting the counterclaim, but it appears so; you seem to suggest that Jesus' claim relates morality with the lack of wealth
Well played response, except that Jesus is going on about a different thing, and so his comment really has nothing to do with your claim. You can tell much from the response of the disciples:
And they were exceedingly astonished, and said to him, “Then who can be saved?”
Without wasting too much of your time writing it all in my response, it's worth reading the context
here and
here. In this story a "rich young ruler" asks what he must do to "have eternal life," and after some conversation Jesus remarks that it is very difficult for the rich to enter the kingdom of heaven, and instead it's easier to pass a camel through eye of a needle (which is, as I understand, humanly impossible), than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. Then Jesus comments that "with man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible."
The disciples, who are amazed at these comments, believe that wealth and morality are directly related, although their claim would be opposite (what I presume to be) yours:
5. Wealth implies morality; wealth implies the "blessing of God," and the blessing of God implies morality
Jesus' response is quite opposite: wealth implies nothing about morality, and indeed it's easier for a camel to enter the eye of a needle than for a wealthy man to enter "eternal life" (on his own; yet all things are possible with God).
I don't know exactly what claim Tex intends above, but it seems that there are three claims being made here in the context of the argument:
A. Wealth implies morality
B. Wealth implies immorality
C. Morality is independent of wealth
This simplifies quite a bit, but I think the claim Jesus is making, that you quote above, is C, which does not support your refutation of Tex. That's why I suggest you're misrepresenting that quote.