There really doesn’t seem to be any logic from Palace here. Hodgson was absolutely dire when Watford appointed him, albeit in far more trouble then than Palace are now but he hardly galvanised that group of young men in need of guidance. Viera had been playing similar football this season to what Roy serves up anyway. They might as well of given Alan Pardew a call
I didn’t want Vieira sacked. I thought our recent run of fixtures very tough and our run in somewhat better. However, Vieira expressed a curious lack of urgency given our form. He had Plan A, which was working fine until the form dipped and he had refused to shift from it. He was adopting a Wengeresque laid back management style which is fine when you have Berkamp, Henri, Overmars etc but not so much with Mateta and Edouard.
Our fitness and running stats are poor as well. A limited choice of replacements so someone who has an excellent relationship with the club hierarchy, has a known style of play, takes no muck from the players ( his avuncular, grandfatherly exterior hides a tough manager) makes some sense. We’re in a fight and the players need to realise that. The logic for Vieira going is that he didn’t transmit any urgency to the players. Roy will. I still think we will be ok. Maintain our current points per game ratio we get to 37. Any improvement could get us to 39 - 40. A few bumps in the road to come but I think we’ll be ok.