summerisle
The rain, it raineth every day
Wirral bin strike off, won a 15% pay rise backdated to April. 


Firstly, I wonder how it came to be that uniform contracts were offered rather than ones based on ability.Once you get to workforces numbering 100000+ on a uniform contract it's different to an individual on a specifically negotiated contract. The comparison is shaky to say the least. There isn't the structure in place to negotiate individually with huge workforces and unlike a PL footballer wanted by another club the employment opportunities or financial safety net aren't necessarily there.
If the entire workforces of the various companies or organisations currently filling the column inches heeded your advice and handed in their collective notices tomorrow they'd still be accused of 'holding the country to ransom' and a sizeable number of them wouldn't be able to keep a roof over their head.
It's unlike you to be hysterical.And with this single sentence, you show that you align yourself with the Tory Government, and IMO, you have been financially-cushioned for all of your life up to present. Thought so all along, you're on the wrong side of the barrier, mate...
Not hysterical at all. Butthurt, Bruce, because I called you out for what you are...?It's unlike you to be hysterical.
I was thinking more of the postal strikes than the NHS as the workforce currently in dispute with RM is more or less a single grade as far as I know. I know little to nothing about NHS, railworkers and other factors that may be relevant in those disputes.Firstly, I wonder how it came to be that uniform contracts were offered rather than ones based on ability.
Secondly, a large number of healthcare workers have left, which is undoubtedly bad for the NHS, who I have said before are an employer I don't hold in high regard at all.
Tory, Tory, TORY!!!
The delivery industry has an obvious point of comparison as the likes of DPR couriers are paid per delivery. I don't know which company @roydo worked for, but maybe he could say how his own income was structured (I'm assuming when he delivered things he wasn't employed by Royal Mail). That's not to say that one approach is better than the other, merely that different approaches exist. The ability to set pay and manage performance on an individual basis is precisely how the majority of companies operate though. It's hardly rocket science.I was thinking more of the postal strikes than the NHS as the workforce currently in dispute with RM is more or less a single grade as far as I know. I know little to nothing about NHS, railworkers and other factors that may be relevant in those disputes.
If you've got tens of thousands of employees all performing the same role than an element of uniformity is necessary. I can't imagine that sitting down and individually reviewing performance of and discussing pay with every individual at set periods is at all practical or financially prudent.
Unions are not without problems for sure. Personally I think they'd do well to reach out to people in ever increasingly fragmented and precarious employment such as delivery services.That's kind of the point, isn't it? The unionised workforce represents about 20% of the entire workforce, but there's a distinct sense that as long as they're OK, too bad for the rest. I mean postal workers aren't campaigning for Hermes or DPD drivers. Hospital nurses aren't campaigning for care home workers. The standard response on this thread has been "too bad, they should join a union", which isn't exactly suggesting that they care about anyone but themselves.
The delivery industry has an obvious point of comparison as the likes of DPR couriers are paid per delivery. I don't know which company @roydo worked for, but maybe he could say how his own income was structured (I'm assuming when he delivered things he wasn't employed by Royal Mail). That's not to say that one approach is better than the other, merely that different approaches exist. The ability to set pay and manage performance on an individual basis is precisely how the majority of companies operate though. It's hardly rocket science.
I do suspect, however, that postal workers have other perks (pensions, sick leave, etc.) that the likes of cycle couriers and gig delivery staff don't enjoy. We're being asked to feel sorry for one section of an industry and ignore the others. I've said repeatedly throughout this thread that I don't begrudge people a higher salary or better conditions or whatever they can get. What other people earn is really none of my business. What I disagree with is going on strike as that harms people who have no role in your circumstances purely because you hope that hurting them will harm managers enough to force them to give in to your demands.
Talking rubbish and having a dig again, eh, Bruce? You just can't stop, can you?A bit like @Old Blue 2 voting for Brexit and stuffing up the touring business for many musicians, which apparently makes him a good old socialist and definitely not a Tory (I'm fairly sure @edge voted for Brexit as well so all those gladly pigeonholing me as a Tory knock yourselves out).
That's the problem with the broader progressive movement these days. It's all good fighting for socially liberal causes like abortion, immigrantrights or marihuana...
But a lot of them are out when the real fight, the economic fight starts.
Redistribution is something the upper middle class doesn't want. You can, however, have some trickle down crumbs...
The delivery industry has an obvious point of comparison as the likes of DPR couriers are paid per delivery. I don't know which company @roydo worked for, but maybe he could say how his own income was structured (I'm assuming when he delivered things he wasn't employed by Royal Mail).
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.