Looting. Not stealing. It’s a different crime.

Give this a read DD
![]()
How the criminal justice system deals with a riot
5th August 2024 Thirteen years ago, I went along to the south London shopping centre expecting to report on a riot. But there was not a riot. And so in a splendid exercise of journalism, I filed a …davidallengreen.com

Mate, it probably brought about less arrests because people just got absolutely leathered for a good few hours until they gave up.Back in the day it was *the* aggravating factor; once a magistrate read out the Riot Act it was open season on anyone in the vicinity.
So yeah it feels harsh , context I suppose is key . If I walk into a shop and steal a bottle of water , the impact to the shop and the community is relatively minor . If a shop window is smashed in , I run into shop take part in looting whilst singing and dancing and passers by or shop owners cower in fear that feels different right ?I wouldn't have been releasing violent criminals early.
Just weeks ago Starmer was doing exactly that.
We're talking serious violent crime, too.
Someone nicking some crocs or sausage rolls shouldn't get longer than someone who caved someone's head in with a brick.
A core principle around law is proportionality - balancing the needs of society with the rights of individuals.
If you think;
- a twenty- three-year-old with no prior convictions sentenced to six monthsʼ imprisonment for stealing £3.50 worth of bottled water
^ is right, then we'll have to agree to disagree.
Back in the day it was *the* aggravating factor; once a magistrate read out the Riot Act it was open season on anyone in the vicinity.
Being the point;
The difference is too much being my point. Examples as someone else give;
We'll see similar this time.
- a twenty- three-year-old with no prior convictions sentenced to six monthsʼ imprisonment for stealing £3.50 worth of bottled water
- a twenty-two-year-old sentenced to sixteen months for stealing ice cream;
- a forty-eight-year-old sentenced to sixteen months for stealing doughnuts.
My first post;
That’s not how the law works though. Context around crimes plays a large role in sentencing. Context such as the situation, circumstances and method of the crime play a large part. Even if the outcome of the crime is identical, all of this gets taken into account.Being the point;
The difference is too much being my point. Examples as someone else give;
We'll see similar this time.
- a twenty- three-year-old with no prior convictions sentenced to six monthsʼ imprisonment for stealing £3.50 worth of bottled water
- a twenty-two-year-old sentenced to sixteen months for stealing ice cream;
- a forty-eight-year-old sentenced to sixteen months for stealing doughnuts.
My first post;
So yeah it feels harsh , context I suppose is key . If I walk into a shop and steal a bottle of water , the impact to the shop and the community is relatively minor . If a shop window is smashed in , I run into shop take part in looting whilst singing and dancing and passers by or shop owners cower in fear that feels different right ?
What I do know is that the hospitality industry in the city centre of Liverpool have seen a dramatic drop in earnings in the last week ; I know people at the weekend cowered in hid in fear as places were smashed up ; know people are actively frightened to come into the city so I’m guessing retail is down ; I know people of colour are terrified of what they saw and how they feel they’ll be treated by the mobs ; the chief Constable of the police said officers are having nightmares ; I know coppers were hospitalised ; I know investigation of other crimes have been paused whilst this has people placed on it’s enquiry ; various offices in the city closed early on Monday sending staff home because of the threat presumably effecting profits and productivity ; I know there has been a huge expenditure on clearing up and repair plus insurance claims that will effect the premiums of many that live in the areas plus the closure of small businesses ; Australia amongst other countries are warning their citizens about travel to the UK which could impact on tourism. I also know a load of families were effected by an horrific attack and specifically asked people not to respond in this way but these requests were ignored . So all in all if these matters are considered by the powers that be and the courts when it comes to sentencing it doesn’t feel wholly shocking to me that the sentences, which are within the guidelines, are at the very top end whereas someone damaging someone’s property a few years ago that no one saw wasn’t seen as quite so high profile .
Again though this is something that is consistent amongst sentences for things that happened during previous riots, it isn’t unique to this one or these communities.
I should say though that I think there is even there a difference between rioting over cops shooting someone and rioting in order to attack a social group who are completely unconnected to the trigger incident. Pogroms should be stamped down on even harder than riots, IMHO.
Yeh, I talked myself (and my mate) out of it last night. I’d have a few Stella’s and it could end up all over the shopMy advice is to stay at home. Put a movie on or something.
It's simply not worth the risk of even inadvertently getting caught up in any of this. Even as a bystander
The best thing you can do is simply continue going about your daily peaceful business
That’s not how the law works though. Context around crimes plays a large role in sentencing. Context such as the situation, circumstances and method of the crime play a large part. Even if the outcome of the crime is identical, all of this gets taken into account.
For example, you have two murders:
One murder, someone stabs the victim once in the chest as a result of a prior disagreement.
The other murder, a completely innocent person gets ambushed and beat to death for no reason other than their sexuality/gender/race.
Both end results are the same, both victims are dead, obviously. However, when sentencing the two, which one do you think will receive a harsher sentence?
Obviously that’s an extreme example but there’s an obvious difference between shoplifting something on a peaceful day from Tesco, and jumping into a smashed up Tesco during a riot and looting stuff.
Doesn't matter if they smashed it up personally or not, the fact that they were part of a riot and looting it during a riot would be considered an aggravating factor in sentencing.
Yeh, I talked myself (and my mate) out of it last night. I’d have a few Stella’s and it could end up all over the shop
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.