Current Affairs Race wars, neo-nazis and other unpleasantness

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back in the day it was *the* aggravating factor; once a magistrate read out the Riot Act it was open season on anyone in the vicinity.
Mate, it probably brought about less arrests because people just got absolutely leathered for a good few hours until they gave up.

Without the official riot act, back in ‘89 there was a disturbance at a rave in Paul St. in Liverpool: 300 rioters and about 50 cops in total.

There weren’t many arrests in total, but the Royal was very busy for a long time after it.
 
I wouldn't have been releasing violent criminals early.

Just weeks ago Starmer was doing exactly that.

We're talking serious violent crime, too.

Someone nicking some crocs or sausage rolls shouldn't get longer than someone who caved someone's head in with a brick.



A core principle around law is proportionality - balancing the needs of society with the rights of individuals.

If you think;

  • a twenty- three-year-old with no prior convictions sentenced to six monthsʼ imprisonment for stealing £3.50 worth of bottled water

^ is right, then we'll have to agree to disagree.
So yeah it feels harsh , context I suppose is key . If I walk into a shop and steal a bottle of water , the impact to the shop and the community is relatively minor . If a shop window is smashed in , I run into shop take part in looting whilst singing and dancing and passers by or shop owners cower in fear that feels different right ?

What I do know is that the hospitality industry in the city centre of Liverpool have seen a dramatic drop in earnings in the last week ; I know people at the weekend cowered in hid in fear as places were smashed up ; know people are actively frightened to come into the city so I’m guessing retail is down ; I know people of colour are terrified of what they saw and how they feel they’ll be treated by the mobs ; the chief Constable of the police said officers are having nightmares ; I know coppers were hospitalised ; I know investigation of other crimes have been paused whilst this has people placed on it’s enquiry ; various offices in the city closed early on Monday sending staff home because of the threat presumably effecting profits and productivity ; I know there has been a huge expenditure on clearing up and repair plus insurance claims that will effect the premiums of many that live in the areas plus the closure of small businesses ; Australia amongst other countries are warning their citizens about travel to the UK which could impact on tourism. I also know a load of families were effected by an horrific attack and specifically asked people not to respond in this way but these requests were ignored . So all in all if these matters are considered by the powers that be and the courts when it comes to sentencing it doesn’t feel wholly shocking to me that the sentences, which are within the guidelines, are at the very top end whereas someone damaging someone’s property a few years ago that no one saw wasn’t seen as quite so high profile .
 
Back in the day it was *the* aggravating factor; once a magistrate read out the Riot Act it was open season on anyone in the vicinity.

The riot act/how it come about/how it's evolved over the years and even how it's used as saying today could make a paper.

Back when it was introduced, the riot act was read out at civil disorder and people had an hour to get off. If they didn't, it would be then they'd get it.
 
Being the point;



The difference is too much being my point. Examples as someone else give;
  • a twenty- three-year-old with no prior convictions sentenced to six monthsʼ imprisonment for stealing £3.50 worth of bottled water
  • a twenty-two-year-old sentenced to sixteen months for stealing ice cream;
  • a forty-eight-year-old sentenced to sixteen months for stealing doughnuts.
We'll see similar this time.

My first post;

Again though this is something that is consistent amongst sentences for things that happened during previous riots, it isn’t unique to this one or these communities.

I should say though that I think there is even there a difference between rioting over cops shooting someone and rioting in order to attack a social group who are completely unconnected to the trigger incident. Pogroms should be stamped down on even harder than riots, IMHO.
 
Being the point;



The difference is too much being my point. Examples as someone else give;
  • a twenty- three-year-old with no prior convictions sentenced to six monthsʼ imprisonment for stealing £3.50 worth of bottled water
  • a twenty-two-year-old sentenced to sixteen months for stealing ice cream;
  • a forty-eight-year-old sentenced to sixteen months for stealing doughnuts.
We'll see similar this time.

My first post;
That’s not how the law works though. Context around crimes plays a large role in sentencing. Context such as the situation, circumstances and method of the crime play a large part. Even if the outcome of the crime is identical, all of this gets taken into account.

For example, you have two murders:

One murder, someone stabs the victim once in the chest as a result of a prior disagreement.

The other murder, a completely innocent person gets ambushed and beat to death for no reason other than their sexuality/gender/race.

Both end results are the same, both victims are dead, obviously. However, when sentencing the two, which one do you think will receive a harsher sentence?

Obviously that’s an extreme example but there’s an obvious difference between shoplifting something on a peaceful day from Tesco, and jumping into a smashed up Tesco during a riot and looting stuff.

Doesn't matter if they smashed it up personally or not, the fact that they were part of a riot and looting it during a riot would be considered an aggravating factor in sentencing.
 
So yeah it feels harsh , context I suppose is key . If I walk into a shop and steal a bottle of water , the impact to the shop and the community is relatively minor . If a shop window is smashed in , I run into shop take part in looting whilst singing and dancing and passers by or shop owners cower in fear that feels different right ?

What I do know is that the hospitality industry in the city centre of Liverpool have seen a dramatic drop in earnings in the last week ; I know people at the weekend cowered in hid in fear as places were smashed up ; know people are actively frightened to come into the city so I’m guessing retail is down ; I know people of colour are terrified of what they saw and how they feel they’ll be treated by the mobs ; the chief Constable of the police said officers are having nightmares ; I know coppers were hospitalised ; I know investigation of other crimes have been paused whilst this has people placed on it’s enquiry ; various offices in the city closed early on Monday sending staff home because of the threat presumably effecting profits and productivity ; I know there has been a huge expenditure on clearing up and repair plus insurance claims that will effect the premiums of many that live in the areas plus the closure of small businesses ; Australia amongst other countries are warning their citizens about travel to the UK which could impact on tourism. I also know a load of families were effected by an horrific attack and specifically asked people not to respond in this way but these requests were ignored . So all in all if these matters are considered by the powers that be and the courts when it comes to sentencing it doesn’t feel wholly shocking to me that the sentences, which are within the guidelines, are at the very top end whereas someone damaging someone’s property a few years ago that no one saw wasn’t seen as quite so high profile .

Precisely

Businesses and individuals are being widely effected. There's dispersal orders from the police in south Liverpool and a no fly zone for drones over most of Merseyside

The cost of policing tax payers are paying is high too

There are unseen wider impacts across the country and the whole point is this is not individual crimes its orchestrated and organised groups committing both individual crimes but also violent disorder and rioting

This is why there's a tough response
 
Again though this is something that is consistent amongst sentences for things that happened during previous riots, it isn’t unique to this one or these communities.

I should say though that I think there is even there a difference between rioting over cops shooting someone and rioting in order to attack a social group who are completely unconnected to the trigger incident. Pogroms should be stamped down on even harder than riots, IMHO.

I know mate.

And it'll happen again - we've not seen it start yet.
 
My advice is to stay at home. Put a movie on or something.

It's simply not worth the risk of even inadvertently getting caught up in any of this. Even as a bystander

The best thing you can do is simply continue going about your daily peaceful business
Yeh, I talked myself (and my mate) out of it last night. I’d have a few Stella’s and it could end up all over the shop
 
That’s not how the law works though. Context around crimes plays a large role in sentencing. Context such as the situation, circumstances and method of the crime play a large part. Even if the outcome of the crime is identical, all of this gets taken into account.

For example, you have two murders:

One murder, someone stabs the victim once in the chest as a result of a prior disagreement.

The other murder, a completely innocent person gets ambushed and beat to death for no reason other than their sexuality/gender/race.

Both end results are the same, both victims are dead, obviously. However, when sentencing the two, which one do you think will receive a harsher sentence?

Obviously that’s an extreme example but there’s an obvious difference between shoplifting something on a peaceful day from Tesco, and jumping into a smashed up Tesco during a riot and looting stuff.

Doesn't matter if they smashed it up personally or not, the fact that they were part of a riot and looting it during a riot would be considered an aggravating factor in sentencing.

Nobody is refuting the example you give.

They'll be ball park in terms of sentencing.

Crimes at riots, aren't.

I think the state go to far and push it too much. I think they do so not out of benefit/value to society, but for themselves.

Again - the examples from 2011;
  • a twenty- three-year-old with no prior convictions sentenced to six monthsʼ imprisonment for stealing £3.50 worth of bottled water
  • a twenty-two-year-old sentenced to sixteen months for stealing ice cream;
  • a forty-eight-year-old sentenced to sixteen months for stealing doughnuts.
We'll see similar.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top