Current Affairs Prince Andrew poor judge of character or what ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Saying no it did not happen is very different to saying I have no recollection of something happening.

Innocent man says the former, guilty man trying to cover his arse incase more damning evidence is uncovered against him blames it on his memory.

He was lying his arse off all way through and that is the conclusion most would come to watching that interview.
If you're going to be a scumbag nonce, you might as well be a full on lying scumbag nonce.

And I bet he sweats like a hog. The toe rag.
 
You're either extremely disgusting or woefully naive...

Do you understand what sex trafficking entails?




It is rape. Her whole claim is she was sex trafficked and raped, forced to have sex.

Stop being a tit.

Tubey, there is an emotional view and a legal view, you are currently going with the emotional view. This happened twenty years ago and even in the pictures, real or faked, it didn’t look like someone being ‘trafficked’. There are many women for whom this is real, but why are you so certain that this is so in this case....If she came to the U.K. and said she was raped by Prince Andrew the Met would be all over this.....
 
You're either extremely disgusting or woefully naive...

Do you understand what sex trafficking entails?




It is rape. Her whole claim is she was sex trafficked and raped, forced to have sex.

Stop being a tit.
And her claims about being trafficked for sex by Epstein to his friends (although not Andrew himself specifically) are echoed by multiple other women. It appears that Epstein was always surrounded by girls/under 20s - very hard to believe that Andrew was unaware of what was going on at the very least.
 
And her claims about being trafficked for sex by Epstein to his friends (although not Andrew himself specifically) are echoed by multiple other women. It appears that Epstein was always surrounded by girls/under 20s - very hard to believe that Andrew was unaware of what was going on at the very least.

Epstein was obviously a cretin and deserved to die. However, I’m not so sure that we should hang everyone who came into contact with him. Perhaps they should, but I’m not so sure....
 
Tubey, there is an emotional view and a legal view, you are currently going with the emotional view. This happened twenty years ago and even in the pictures, real or faked, it didn’t look like someone being ‘trafficked’. There are many women for whom this is real, but why are you so certain that this is so in this case....If she came to the U.K. and said she was raped by Prince Andrew the Met would be all over this.....

No I'm going with the legal view - you can only consent to sex without being coerced. The claim is she was raped.

I emotionally think you are disgusting for thinking this woman had any capacity to consent in those circumstances.
 
And her claims about being trafficked for sex by Epstein to his friends (although not Andrew himself specifically) are echoed by multiple other women. It appears that Epstein was always surrounded by girls/under 20s - very hard to believe that Andrew was unaware of what was going on at the very least.

Well, Pete seemed to think a 17 year old girl consented to randomly have sex with Epstein's mate and was fully on board with doing so, with no coercion whatsoever.

Amazingly.
 
Epstein was obviously a cretin and deserved to die. However, I’m not so sure that we should hang everyone who came into contact with him. Perhaps they should, but I’m not so sure....
Those that just “Came into contact with him” - no.

Those that enabled him, giving him social standing even after his conviction and at best turning a blind eye to his continued abuse - I see no problem subjecting them to further scrutiny.
 
No I'm going with the legal view - you can only consent to sex without being coerced. The claim is she was raped.

I emotionally think you are disgusting for thinking this woman had any capacity to consent in those circumstances.
Well, Pete seemed to think a 17 year old girl consented to randomly have sex with Epstein's mate and was fully on board with doing so, with no coercion whatsoever.

Amazingly.

No, I don’t know, but apparently you do.....
 
Those that just “Came into contact with him” - no.

Those that enabled him, giving him social standing even after his conviction and at best turning a blind eye to his continued abuse - I see no problem subjecting them to further scrutiny.

I agree, give them all the third degree. But let’s not convict before we know for sure. We’ve already had one episode in the U.K. where ‘nick’ and Tom Watson dragged innocent people through the mire.....,
 
I agree, give them all the third degree. But let’s not convict before we know for sure. We’ve already had one episode in the U.K. where ‘nick’ and Tom Watson dragged innocent people through the mire.....,
Put behind bars - agree.

But I don’t see why you need overwhelming evidence to think badly of someone. Andrew’s own behavior and comments, even with the most generous interpretation of them, are gross.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top