Prepare for the incoming bad press...

[Goat]

Only after a hard fought 3-2 at home against the best team in the league, could Kopites and weapons like Martin Tyler claim we threw the game.

RAWK claims the crowd sucked the life out of the game.



We are the anti-12th man.

 

[Ara]

If anyone deserves bad press it's Dzeko, for his 15 mins of faining injury, ref should have sent him off

 

[roydo]

RAWK claims the crowd sucked the life out of the game.



We are the anti-12th man.

RAWK has out-RAWKed itself on this. It is truly laughable.

 

[Jeff Jones]

Thing is, regarding Tyler, I wouldn't mind if it was his genuine opinion - everyone is allowed those - but he was clearly inventing a situation that wasn't there, which means that in his paid job to be impartial and call the action he was allowing unsubstantiated bias to cloud his performance.

He should be disciplined for it by his bosses, but I have a massive suspicion that his bosses are the very people who wanted the action called that way yesterday.

It was propaganda, pure and simple.

I wish I'd seen/heard Martin Tyler's call. He's been my number one commentator for as long as he's been doing the job and I've often wondered who he supports. I've heard nothing to make me think he's a biased Red, and I'll be disappointed if he is.

Not because he's biased in favour of them, just that he's biased, at all.

 

[Tubey]

I wish I'd seen/heard Martin Tyler's call. He's been my number one commentator for as long as he's been doing the job and I've often wondered who he supports. I've heard nothing to make me think he's a biased Red, and I'll be disappointed if he is.

Not because he's biased in favour of them, just that he's biased, at all.

Imagine sitting next to your worst biased RS mate and he was every 30 seconds ripping on Everton fans for no apparent reason, claiming we wouldn't bother celebrating a goal if we scored.

It was that. It wasn't just bias, it was nailing his colours to the mast.

 

[Jeff Jones]

RAWK has out-RAWKed itself on this. It is truly laughable.

I actually went there before I came here today. I was just curious and went there expecting some outrageously
ridiculous opinions/accusations from them.

I won't give any examples, but suffice to say I wasn't surprised. I know all clubs have them, but a lot of theirs
are utterly thick.

 

[ste d' indica]

We are the anti-12th man.[/QUOTE]

RAWK has out-RAWKed itself on this. It is truly laughable.

 

[Toffeelover]

The Liverpool fans nauseate me with their ridiculous comments, they did not lose the PL because of the result yesterday but rather some of their pathetic performances earlier in the season. OF course though they all suffer from Dementia and have memory loss.

And to bring his Hillsborough into comments is sickening.

BTW the report in the Sunday Times was good and fair.

 

[chrissyjack]

RAWK claims the crowd sucked the life out of the game.



We are the anti-12th man.

Ah. The false number 12

 

[PaddyG]

While watching the game I wanted us to win, celebrated Barkley's goal etc.

But after seeing everything these kopites are saying I'm made up we lost.

And I'll be cheering on City for their next two games.

 

[Jeff Jones]

Imagine sitting next to your worst biased RS mate and he was every 30 seconds ripping on Everton fans for no apparent reason, claiming we wouldn't bother celebrating a goal if we scored.

It was that. It wasn't just bias, it was nailing his colours to the mast.

That is disappointing, then. It's almost as bad as finding out that Rolf Harris may not be what he seemed.

 

[Guest89]

As goes Tyler, I noticed his bias toward Liverpool during the Chelsea game. He was willing the ball in. Always annoys me when the commentator does that. I don't mind from the likes of Neville, Smith, Gray etc because they played for clubs and they're there to offer insight, but when the guy calling it shows allegiance I think it's just horrible.

 

[Alan Whittle]

What's all that holmesdale ultras about mate? Bit cringey isn't it

Yeah, if you say so.

 

[Tubey]

As goes Tyler, I noticed his bias toward Liverpool during the Chelsea game. He was willing the ball in. Always annoys me when the commentator does that. I don't mind from the likes of Neville, Smith, Gray etc because they played for clubs and they're there to offer insight, but when the guy calling it shows allegiance I think it's just horrible.

He rattled off every Liverpool strikers name from around 1920 like some sort of voodoo ritual for a goal that game. Was surreal, but you could sort of dismiss it as trying to build tension for the viewer.

Yesterday though was just pure bias, plain and simple.

 

[Deleted member 28206]

More
http://metro.co.uk/2014/05/04/why-l...rted-efforts-against-manchester-city-4717621/

Written by a Kopite