Firstly, I didn't say it was less expensive but rather you had to consider costs along with time scale and improvements. But to play along...Please show me the figures quoting it is less expensive building a new stadium when compared to redeveloping Goodison in stages.
Looking objectively, redeveloping the Main Stand at Anfield is costing £114m for an additional eight or nine thousands seats to their attendance.
That is the cost for one stand being redeveloped and expanded without the money they've spent on purchasing properties. Seems quite a bit?
Thinking logically, would the cost of redeveloping three stands at Goodison (all in poor condition) be a similar price for each stand?
Even if it is less, I would still expect a significant outlay required to bring the stadium up to a standard that will fulfil our future growth.
Are you talking just about new roofs? Major works? Rebuilds? I'd suggest at least £160-250m would be required for significant redevelopments.
If not more! Can you show me figures to indicate that these aren't sensible estimates? What figures do you have to show it will be less that this?
Compare that to the fact that Juventus built a new forty-one thousand seater stadium (UEFA Category 4) for €120 million (current rate of £94m).
Strasbourg are also in the process of building a new state of the art multi-purpose stadium which is looking at €250m (close to £200m).
Consider the costs compared with the time scale of redevelopment (loss of attendances) and level of improvement it'll generate for the club.
After all that I still stand by the new stadium... I'd like to stay at Goodison if it was feasible. Possible yes, but sensible no.