The big question in my mind is would Hitler have been a better football manager than Martinez?
He'd have us playing two teams at once on either side of the pitch.
The big question in my mind is would Hitler have been a better football manager than Martinez?
Dav there is thirty points to play for and you think we are safe already, I hope you are right but you know the saying
never count your chickens!!!!
Come on, it's only a light-hearted and utterly facetious attempt to make light of the whole situation.
No wonder people get wound up about @davek and others if you can't make an occasional whimsical or fanciful remark without being taken serious.
That's for @Boss_Blue and @Dithering Dougie too.
He'd have us playing two teams at once on either side of the pitch.
I wouldn't be going near the showers after a defeat...He'd have us playing two teams at once on either side of the pitch.
We'd dominate Europe before getting relegated.Strong start but we would tire in the second half.
You know you're in deep when your wing man Damon does a bunk trying to save his credibilityWhere's damo disappeared to in this debate. Miss him tagging dave into every single post.
Sure dave misses it as well
Strong start but we would tire in the second half.
He'd eradicate all our opponents in what he'd term as the "phenomenal solution"He'd probably captain Peter Odemwingie, who would fly to the grounds of Hamilton Academical to force a move through.
Jagielka would be more uncomfortable as our captain that he currently is.He'd eradicate all our opponents in what he'd term as the "phenomenal solution"
I cant believe you've brought Hitler into this!!!![]()
Still, as you make this place a much more enjoyable place I'll choose to have a nibble to see how things will develop.
You mention that it's a response to being unable to counter points about comparison between this season and the last. Okay then...
Isn't that view simplistic in its nature? Just because he had a good season last year, doesn't mean he hasn't shown traits of despair this season.
I think of it this way... Kendall MKI was fantastic: he gained adulation from the fans for what we achieved during his tenure as manager.
However, Kendall MKII and the later MKIII had nowhere near had the same influence, which the records clearly show. MKIII was worrying.
It would have been extremely easy to disregard any of his failings in the later years due to his earlier success (blue tinted glasses).
Yet, that's ignoring the present situation which is arguably much more important than focusing simply on the past.
Eventually his time was up and the correct decision was made. Arguably, the same could be applied to Martinez MKI and the current version.
Without a shadow of a doubt, last season was wonderful: great performances; inspiring managements; effective tactics and substitutions.
There he unequivocally showed aspects of being a 'good' manager, yet this year he's unequivocally showing aspects of a 'poor' manager.
He has inflexibility in his mentality and approach to the same, poor decision making and a reluctance (or inability) to adapt our style of play.
As a good manager you need to be able to adapt to succeed, rather than keep bludgeoning at the same old approach to get the desire results.
Last year the smooth veneer and positive aura oozed class and maturity, which I admit many of the fans were wooed by. We loved his 'class'!
However, this same approach has began to form cracks in his guise through using ambitious vocabulary to assess some absolute dross.
It's not ignoring the past by being generally concerned, rather assessing the past compared with the present. For example...
'Phenomenal' performances and 'fantastic' character are wonderful when things are going well; less so when you're actually pretty dire.
You could also mention his tactical awkwardness where we continue to play the turgid football that has emerged. Where's last season gone?
Hiter was fantastic at first in his approach to managing Germany, however eventually in his later years the same approach brought their downfall.
When considering the positive years and his demise together, would it not be fair to believe he was delusional and generally 'unfit' to rule?
As with Martinez, he has shown hints of brilliance but on balance, he's shown hints of being unable to manage. Is the scale is beginning to tip?
If it were simply a short dip then your argument would hold more weight, however it's week in week out that the same mistakes occur.
Those behind Martinez are adamant that he can change things around: why? What evidence from last season hints he is able to adapt?
Evidence from this season on the other hand, suggest that he does not have the ability to readjust to the situation at hand.
Will our formation change next season? Will he be more inclined to play two wide players? When will we play to our (and the players) strengths?
Last season should not be forgotten (and I do not think it is), nevertheless it is not an excuse to neglect or ignore his tenure this season.
Nor does it help answer any of the key question which have emerged this season; questions which fans are just to be asking.
I'd love to give him the benefit of the doubt... I wish I was behind him... However there are far too many unanswered and difficult questions.
As you're clearly a relatively intelligent gentlemen, all the above is why it appears as if you're either a wind up or utterly delusional.
Possibly you're just too good at your role to make your whole 'Bobby love in' unbelievable. A more balanced approach would be believable.
He'd eradicate all our opponents in what he'd term as the "phenomenal solution"
and those who insult him left to stew in their own piss.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.