Manchester United

So being anti-immigration equates to being "racist"?

You don't have any credible arguments for your side hence you resort to name-calling.
Being racist amounts to being racist

You aren't anti immigration, you're anti 'people from third world countries' coming, your words.
You also aren't anti population growth despite saying it was an issue at first because you later claimed over 2% growth through native births was fine but the 0.65% partly through immigration was not.

There's more but what's the point...
You are a racist, you've been well called out on it here and in the old CA forum, and I hope you continue to get called out wherever you are.
 
Last edited:
Bring racist amounts to being racist

You aren't anti immigration, you're anti 'people from third world countries' coming, your words.
You also aren't anti population growth despite saying it was an issue at first because you later claimed over 2% growth through native births was fine but the 0.65% partly through immigration was not.

There's more but what's the point...
You are a racist, you've been well called out on it here and in the old CA forum, and I hope you continue to get called out wherever you are.
That's because somebody from a third world country is more likely to come to the UK and freeload off the social benefits the country has to offer and would not be a net contributor to the economy. It's nothing to do with the color. Back in the day pre-Brexit, somebody from a third world country like Romania/Bulgaria would do the same but they're white. As I've said many times, it's about the quality of immigrant more than anything.

What's wrong with wanting more native births? As an economy if we are to sustain a reasonable growth, we'd need to have the fertility rate over 2.1 to have it within replacement levels. It's not racist to want more of the country to have more children, it's crucial to our survival.
 
That's because somebody from a third world country is more likely to come to the UK and freeload off the social benefits the country has to offer and would not be a net contributor to the economy. It's nothing to do with the color. Back in the day pre-Brexit, somebody from a third world country like Romania/Bulgaria would do the same but they're white. As I've said many times, it's about the quality of immigrant more than anything.

What's wrong with wanting more native births? As an economy if we are to sustain a reasonable growth, we'd need to have the fertility rate over 2.1 to have it within replacement levels. It's not racist to want more of the country to have more children, it's crucial to our survival.
Lad. Tell us about the time you were pumping that HOT scando lass.
 
Essentially, the Bank of England. It's used to destroy the funds created by the bank to fund the government's budget. Practically, it's just numbers on an accounting ledger as the BOE creates the funds from nothing.

Little known fact about the way the economy works: commercial banks create money from nothing. 80% of the money in the economy is magicked into existence by commercial banks. If you get a mortgage or loan from, say, Lloyds, the money the bank gives you doesn't exist before they magic it into existence. It's shown as a credit on the bank's ledger and that money is destroyed by the repayment of the mortgage. The bank's profit is then realised on the interest. As banks are creating money that didn't exist before and are charging interest on the loans, then the amount of money required to repay is more than the amount they wished into existence. The result, of course, is that there needs to be more money magicked into existence from elsewhere to repay the debt + interest. So, the entirety of the world's economy, built on this system, is essentially one of ever increasing money creation through bank debt.

Depressing, eh?
P
O
N
Z
I
 
Just as a reminder for anyone who missed it last time around regarding this utter tool:

 
That's because somebody from a third world country is more likely to come to the UK and freeload off the social benefits the country has to offer and would not be a net contributor to the economy. It's nothing to do with the color. Back in the day pre-Brexit, somebody from a third world country like Romania/Bulgaria would do the same but they're white. As I've said many times, it's about the quality of immigrant more than anything.

What's wrong with wanting more native births? As an economy if we are to sustain a reasonable growth, we'd need to have the fertility rate over 2.1 to have it within replacement levels. It's not racist to want more of the country to have more children, it's crucial to our survival.
Uuuuh-huh, third world :lol:
 

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top