Agreed. But 'Colonisation' is a made-up word to push an agenda. It has never, ever happened. No siree!
Just pointing out that when we colonised the world (British Empire) it was perfectly fine (proper white people) but when any of those foreigners come here it is the end of the world. Not sure it's that difficult to understand.Wait, what?
Being racist amounts to being racistSo being anti-immigration equates to being "racist"?
You don't have any credible arguments for your side hence you resort to name-calling.
That's because somebody from a third world country is more likely to come to the UK and freeload off the social benefits the country has to offer and would not be a net contributor to the economy. It's nothing to do with the color. Back in the day pre-Brexit, somebody from a third world country like Romania/Bulgaria would do the same but they're white. As I've said many times, it's about the quality of immigrant more than anything.Bring racist amounts to being racist
You aren't anti immigration, you're anti 'people from third world countries' coming, your words.
You also aren't anti population growth despite saying it was an issue at first because you later claimed over 2% growth through native births was fine but the 0.65% partly through immigration was not.
There's more but what's the point...
You are a racist, you've been well called out on it here and in the old CA forum, and I hope you continue to get called out wherever you are.
Lad. Tell us about the time you were pumping that HOT scando lass.That's because somebody from a third world country is more likely to come to the UK and freeload off the social benefits the country has to offer and would not be a net contributor to the economy. It's nothing to do with the color. Back in the day pre-Brexit, somebody from a third world country like Romania/Bulgaria would do the same but they're white. As I've said many times, it's about the quality of immigrant more than anything.
What's wrong with wanting more native births? As an economy if we are to sustain a reasonable growth, we'd need to have the fertility rate over 2.1 to have it within replacement levels. It's not racist to want more of the country to have more children, it's crucial to our survival.
People who watch BBC news content can’t think for themselves and have to have the BBC tell them what to think.
Ratcliffe is right.
PEssentially, the Bank of England. It's used to destroy the funds created by the bank to fund the government's budget. Practically, it's just numbers on an accounting ledger as the BOE creates the funds from nothing.
Little known fact about the way the economy works: commercial banks create money from nothing. 80% of the money in the economy is magicked into existence by commercial banks. If you get a mortgage or loan from, say, Lloyds, the money the bank gives you doesn't exist before they magic it into existence. It's shown as a credit on the bank's ledger and that money is destroyed by the repayment of the mortgage. The bank's profit is then realised on the interest. As banks are creating money that didn't exist before and are charging interest on the loans, then the amount of money required to repay is more than the amount they wished into existence. The result, of course, is that there needs to be more money magicked into existence from elsewhere to repay the debt + interest. So, the entirety of the world's economy, built on this system, is essentially one of ever increasing money creation through bank debt.
Depressing, eh?
You actually sound like a freak, not a rational thinking adult.
I think nobody truly knows the full answer on how old the Earth is, or whether dinosaurs/humans existed at the same time.
Bot.Remember folks, he's a WUM and has been caught out lying and making things up on multiple occasions on here. It's why he keeps disappearing.
Pop him on ignore and move on, not worth wasting your energy on.
Uuuuh-huh, third worldThat's because somebody from a third world country is more likely to come to the UK and freeload off the social benefits the country has to offer and would not be a net contributor to the economy. It's nothing to do with the color. Back in the day pre-Brexit, somebody from a third world country like Romania/Bulgaria would do the same but they're white. As I've said many times, it's about the quality of immigrant more than anything.
What's wrong with wanting more native births? As an economy if we are to sustain a reasonable growth, we'd need to have the fertility rate over 2.1 to have it within replacement levels. It's not racist to want more of the country to have more children, it's crucial to our survival.

Yo duality hope you are sound.Uuuuh-huh, third world![]()
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.