For anyone interested, there’s an article from the WSJ taken from Hirsi Ali’s later book about Islamic Reformation, which sets out her argument.
For what’s it’s worth I think her rhetoric on the topic has often been extremely unhelpful, and I think her arguments place far too much emphasis purely on the text, and ignores many of the other angles of all forms of extremism - the process of radicalisation, the fact that it’s almost always young men, the role of charismatic preachers and indoctrination, foreign policy, mental health issues etc.
I’m also doubtful as to whether her proposals would, or could, work, as it would require throwing some of key tenets in the bin, akin to asking Christians to accept that Jesus was just some guy, or that the 10 commandments are just rough guidelines.
There’s a reason her arguments have been better received in non-Muslim circles, as she’s writing from an atheist position, and is often deliberately inflammatory, which is not a good starting point if the aim is to get Muslims to buy into reformation and pluralism of interpretation.
To defeat the extremists for good, Muslims must reject those aspects of their tradition that prompt some believers to resort to oppression and holy war.
www.wsj.com