Dental records and DNA aren’t as quick as a formal identify.The coppers are still playing their cards close to their chests on the identity of the attackers.
Are we completely sure this hasn't been a Kopite?
Dental records and DNA aren’t as quick as a formal identify.The coppers are still playing their cards close to their chests on the identity of the attackers.
Are we completely sure this hasn't been a Kopite?
I heard they found an arm on Upper Parliament Street with YNWA on it.Dental records and DNA aren’t as quick as a formal identify.
You're dead funny lad...???????bore off.
And I guess you don't understand how capitalism works or what it is?I wonder would you have the same low opinion of the freedoms you enjoy if you had to spend say a year in a communist state and then a year in Saudi? I suspect you'd be crying with joy on the flight home.
Extremists?What’s “they” referring to then?
Who’s to say they doesn't mean extremist?I may have missed something (been working) but has the culprit been confirmed as being foreign? Because I have only seen "of middle eastern descent" being mentioned which could easily mean that they are scouse as he is (not that anybody could be THAT scouse) and in that case the use of "they" becomes problematic.
It's never about immigration yet its the first thing that rears it's ugly head.
what do you mean?You're dead funny lad...???????
And the mathematics, hospitals and poetry, but apart from that...Fair enough, I like the architecture.
I don't believe my position was that no crimes have ever been committed by any religion but one. Rather that we are only talking about islamic fundamentalism because of its scale and reach. It dwarfs atrocities carried out in the name of other regions, surely we can agree that, there doesn't need to be a debate about it. And I certainly wasn't calling for one on that point. The debate I was calling for was on Islam as it exists today, and the issues it presents for western societies.It's quite interesting this though.
You have came in asking for a discussion and a discussion is being given.
You then ask for examples of other religious terrorism and they are given. Are you going to ignore them because if so really its not a discussion it's just some bias confirmation being sought. (I don't think its that, you have never struck me as that type)
I think its important in bad times not to start attacking but to reflect instead and ask the right questions.
Take the answers on board, there is no shame in not knowing about the above mentioned incidents, you would have to be going out of your way to know about them as they are not reported as much so most people will be in the same boat. If someone is giving you extra knowledge use it and recalculate opinions.
Sorry that sounds really sanctimonious and it's not meant to be, I just think people need to take on board things that they may not have known previously more.
Context is everything, if it needs clarifying and is open to conjecture, then it hasn't been argued well.What’s wrong with him saying they?
Honestly you can’t say anything these days without some mushroom indicating it as racist.
I heard they found an arm on Upper Parliament Street with YNWA on it.
Should have said that then. No?Extremists?
Try getting dental identification off a 2 toothed kopite ffsDental records and DNA aren’t as quick as a formal identify.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.