Jordan Peterson Thread.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Or it could be even more subtle (i.e., structural); men tend to hire men even when they think they are making a good will effort to diversify.


You know, I find it hard to reconcile my inner liberal with my actual experience when it comes to this. I have worked in female dominated environments my whole life, from nine years in a hospital where the medical, nursing, administration staff and hospital manager were almost uniformly women, to now being a Recruitment Consultant for HR and Office, where I have gotten jobs for about a hundred women, but 3 blokes. That's not an exaggeration. I know that women struggle on average more to get executive level posts or at least don't get paid the same for them, but they do have massive advantages in certain areas. I don't think executive pay disparities are a good place to start when it comes to gender perception in the workplace
 

For a clinical psychologist, who presumably has studied how physical height is a subconscious factor in whether someone is viewed as a leader, to assign women wearing high heels solely to their desire for sexual attention seems an incomplete analysis.

Similarly he is discounting any social norms about the wearing of makeup by women (speaking from experience in some work environments it is as expected as a tie is for a man and not wearing it can be perceived as messages about conformity/personal grooming standards) I’m skeptical about the rest of his reasoning.
 
Comes across as a mega blurt in this, to the point where his cult like fanbase claimed it was cleverly edited... only to find it wasn’t. As someone in the comments says

“Literally the inverse claim to what he says to Cathy Newman "the experiment has been run"



It’s such a weird way to argue. It’s that ‘I’m just asking questions’ nonsense that is so intellectually empty. He’s asking questions like that in that interview in under to make controversial comments without having to actually say them
 
For a clinical psychologist, who presumably has studied how physical height is a subconscious factor in whether someone is viewed as a leader, to assign women wearing high heels solely to their desire for sexual attention seems an incomplete analysis.

Similarly he is discounting any social norms about the wearing of makeup by women (speaking from experience in some work environments it is as expected as a tie is for a man and not wearing it can be perceived as messages about conformity/personal grooming standards) I’m skeptical about the rest of his reasoning.


He, like many others, is seduced by pop-Evolutionary Psychology. It is just so easy to say things like "the reason we do this today is that back in our evolutionary past, men did hunted, yadda-yadda-yadda..." I am quite critical and skeptical of a lot of Evolutionary Psychology research, particularly when it gets used to (often prejudicially) rationalize, rather than explain, behavioral differences among men/women, individuals, groups, etc. Also, there are lots of bad studies in Evolutionary Psychology that are founded on weak research design and weak statistical analysis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top