Transfer Rumour Joe Hart

Would u have him

  • Yes

  • No

  • Im sitting on the fence with Cheese on Toast

Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
bluestevon said:
Benefit for us on a loan is if he stinks the gaff up we aren't saddled with 120k wages and a 30m waste on fee, plus we can drop him and go with stek, which couldn't see happening if we bought him.
Click to expand...


I don't think he becomes a bad keep almost overnight though. He's obviously effected people's perception of him after Euro's, but he's been talked about as one of the best keepers for years, and rightly so. All keepers make mistakes. I just think at 29 we know what we are buying. Out of form - perhaps yes. A bad keeper on the decline - not at all. Therefore I just feel a loan may come back to bite us, but we will have to wait & see.
 
jrj said:
There is absolutely no correlation between wasting 13.5m on Niasse and getting Joe Hart on loan, what on earth are you on about?!?
A simple proposal? Clearly you don't know what you are talking about, Pep has said in interviews he needs a keeper good with his feet right now which Hart isn't, but said if Hart stays he will learn over time. You can't just suddenly have great distribution.
Click to expand...


If you care to read all these postings you would soon realise how stupid your ill informed comments are, I am arguing against us spending £30 mil on Hart,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,we wasted £13.5 mil on Niasse hence those deals correlate as one is known to be a poor player at the moment the other was Niasse.

How much would he have to learn to have good feet, will have to go to dance classes..........................what Pep is saying is a pure and simple sales pitch, bet you believe Niasse was the best player in Russia last term............ooops there's another correlation.. Pep has seen Hart in training and didn't like what he saw hence he's giving him the bums rush. Just for the record I've watched and played the game football for over 60 years, possibly before your dad was born so I do have a good idea of what I'm talking about unlike the drivel you just produced.
 
Last edited:
rochdaleblue said:
Stek has been very good the last 2 games. However if he produced this form on a regular basis, he wouldn't have been southamptons number 2.
Click to expand...

Forster was injured last term if I recall.................and he's better than Hart
 
monty said:
If you care to read all these postings you would soon realise how stupid your ill informed comments are, I am arguing against us spending £30 mil on Hart,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,we wasted £13.5 mil on Niasse hence those deals correlate as one is known to be a poor player at the moment the other was Niasse.

How much would he have to learn to have good feet, will have to go to dance classes..........................what Pep is saying is a pure and simple sales pitch, bet you believe Niasse was the best player in Russia last term............ooops there's another correlation.. Pep has seen Hart in training and didn't like what he saw hence he's giving him the bums rush. Just for the record I've watched and played the game football for over 60 years, possibly before your dad was born so I do have a good idea of what I'm talking about unlike the drivel you just produced.
Click to expand...

No, you were arguing that our current keepers are better than Joe Hart. And on spending 30m, did you make that figure up? We have been linked with loaning him, not buying.

Why would I think Niasse is the best player in Russia last term? I had never watched him, whereas Hart I have regularly. Your argument hurts my brain, it makes zero sense. Because you've watched football for over 60 years does not mean you know that our current goalkeepers are better than Hart.
 
jrj said:
No, you were arguing that our current keepers are better than Joe Hart. And on spending 30m, did you make that figure up? We have been linked with loaning him, not buying.

Why would I think Niasse is the best player in Russia last term? I had never watched him, whereas Hart I have regularly. Your argument hurts my brain, it makes zero sense. Because you've watched football for over 60 years does not mean you know that our current goalkeepers are better than Hart.
Click to expand...
Look it's his opinion if he doesn't like Hart then so what maybe he thinks he is not worth the gamble like me others do if we do sign him then we will support him if he lets clangers in drop him as city have done twice to my knowledge?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top