Transfer Rumour Joe Hart

[jrj]

Nonsense......you just wrote it

Pep doesn't make decisions ad hoc, he considers then acts. Are you trying to tell me he never saw Hart play or train before inviting him to leave, if you do I'd say that is utter nonsense. I know enough Citeh fans, some of which called him Calamity Joe, so they do exist. If he was the brilliant shot stopper you make him out to be then being a sweeper keeper should be no problem. You say he can't play the way Pep wants him to, I'd agree with that but for obviously different reasons. Please don't place your argument on newspaper hearsay its notoriously a load of b-------s.

When assessing Stickleback against Hart on their last two competitive games then yes, MS has made some really good saves and is solid holding the ball and distributing it, Hart isn't better on each count or have you seen different games. I find it sad that so many of our fans turn into Chelski supporters because we have some money, what we have must be spent on what we need and we don't need Joe 'oops a daisey' Hart. Throw money down the drain like Niasse even Moshiri can't afford that only difference being is that Hart will cost far more.

Thanks for giving me a laugh on a dire Sunday morning.lol

Of course he saw him play, which is what I am saying - he had made this decision very early on before he had even begun training. I am not sourcing a newspaper, it was in all the papers including local ones.
Do you understand the term sweeper keeper? Because being a good 'shot stopper' does not make you one, isn't every keeper a good shot stopper? lol

I have no idea how wanting Joe Hart makes us anything like Chelsea fans, ridiculous lol
I am not desperate for us to sign him, for me we have other priorities. However Koeman has stated he wants another keeper, and if Hart is available on loan it would be a brilliant signing & upgrade on what we have.

 

[AaronTheBlue]

Wonder why we don't want perm?

Because it would cost a lot more to bring him in especially when we have other positions to fill and the player probably isn't convinced enough to join us permanently especially considering we have no Europe etc

 

[matty1878]

Yes?

lol

 

[toffeeblue9]

No one is right all the time (including me) but other than the nonsensical sweeper keeper argument that beggars belief what other reason would Pep want him out.............doesn't he like head and shoulders

I would love to know why it's nonsensical

Firstly, Guardiola has actually said this is the case

Secondly, Hart's stats seem to back up Guardiola's assertion about his inability to distribute the ball well enough to play this way

So, unless I'm missing something, you're saying we should ignore what Pep is saying and accept your theory that he doesn't want him because Hart, you believe, is useless?

Not meaning to be argumentative there, just wondering if I've missed something along the way in this thread?

 

[Deleted member 24970]

Im guessing 95% of you wouldnt have Zlatan or Suarez becausenthey both have their moments of being 'blerts'.

Zlatan is King no wonder he views you all as mere peasants.

 

[monty]

Of course he saw him play, which is what I am saying - he had made this decision very early on before he had even begun training. I am not sourcing a newspaper, it was in all the papers including local ones.
Do you understand the term sweeper keeper? Because being a good 'shot stopper' does not make you one, isn't every keeper a good shot stopper? lol

I have no idea how wanting Joe Hart makes us anything like Chelsea fans, ridiculous lol
I am not desperate for us to sign him, for me we have other priorities. However Koeman has stated he wants another keeper, and if Hart is available on loan it would be a brilliant signing & upgrade on what we have.

Oh laughing boy again.

Your the one wanting to splash the cash on crap, your the one who can't see a correlation between us taking a gambol on Niasse and splashing £30 mil on Hart. I fully understand the term sweeper keeper, if he can't do that at Citeh what happens here if RK requires it, genius Hart can't grasp a simple proposal like that just as he can't hold on to a ball.

If Koeman wants him who am I to question him, he has forgotten more about football than either of us know but I still maintain the fundamental truth that Hart will be an upgrade on what we have already is nonsense, if he was as good as you make him out to be we'd sign him without argument

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

Oh laughing boy again.

Your the one wanting to splash the cash on crap, your the one who can't see a correlation between us taking a gambol on Niasse and splashing £30 mil on Hart. I fully understand the term sweeper keeper, if he can't do that at Citeh what happens here if RK requires it, genius Hart can't grasp a simple proposal like that just as he can't hold on to a ball.

If Koeman wants him who am I to question him, he has forgotten more about football than either of us know but I still maintain the fundamental truth that Hart will be an upgrade on what we have already is nonsense, if he was as good as you make him out to be we'd sign him without argument

If you don't think that Hart is an upgrade on Robles and Stek then I don't know what you've been watching mate

 

[Durham Toffee]

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/evertons-joe-hart-hopes-hinge-11779300

Everton's chances of luring Joe Hart to Goodison could be boosted by Barcelona completing a deal for another former Blues target.

The chain of transfers necessary to leave Hart free to find a new club would start with the Nou Camp giants tying-up the signing of Ajax shot-stopper Jasper Cillesen, who Everton were linked with earlier this summer.

Barca technical secretary Robert Fernandez confirmed yesterday that they are waiting to secure that deal before allowing City to complete the capture of Claudio Bravo.

 

[Toffeelover]

Rumour is that the Bravo transfer is on it's way so hart will be odd one out.

 

[monty]

If you don't think that Hart is an upgrade on Robles and Stek then I don't know what you've been watching mate

If Stek had made cock ups like Hart you'd be right

 

[waterboy]

If you don't think that Hart is an upgrade on Robles and Stek then I don't know what you've been watching mate

probably the same games pep has watched and made up his mind to sell

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

If Stek had made cock ups like Hart you'd be right

He has, plenty of them

 

[jrj]

Oh laughing boy again.

Your the one wanting to splash the cash on crap, your the one who can't see a correlation between us taking a gambol on Niasse and splashing £30 mil on Hart. I fully understand the term sweeper keeper, if he can't do that at Citeh what happens here if RK requires it, genius Hart can't grasp a simple proposal like that just as he can't hold on to a ball.

If Koeman wants him who am I to question him, he has forgotten more about football than either of us know but I still maintain the fundamental truth that Hart will be an upgrade on what we have already is nonsense, if he was as good as you make him out to be we'd sign him without argument

There is absolutely no correlation between wasting 13.5m on Niasse and getting Joe Hart on loan, what on earth are you on about?!?
A simple proposal? Clearly you don't know what you are talking about, Pep has said in interviews he needs a keeper good with his feet right now which Hart isn't, but said if Hart stays he will learn over time. You can't just suddenly have great distribution.

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

probably the same games pep has watched and made up his mind to sell

Pep didn't bin him in favour of Robles and Stek though, otherwise you might have had a point.

 

[waterboy]

Pep didn't bin him in favour of Robles and Stek though, otherwise you might have had a point.

willy cabellero is about that standard though right?