it would be silly to have loan spots and not use them right?

Logically, yes, but there are loan fees flying around of £5m or so for 6 months which is utterly daftit would be silly to have loan spots and not use them right?
![]()
City would probably accept and we would pay 20/25 mOn Grealish he's probably right, maybe not Villa but unless City would accept the amount he owes them under PSR which one poster stated was around 16 million,I doubt our owners would pay around the 50 City allegedly want as Grealish's age doesn't fit what appears to be our present transfer profile.
What is a Moyes player
Don’t we have 2 domestic loans (1 left with Grealish) and 6 international loans?it would be silly to have loan spots and not use them right?
![]()
Matchday Squad: A maximum of five loanees can be named in a matchday squadDon’t we have 2 domestic loans (1 left with Grealish) and 6 international loans?
If you say that you might pay £5m per loan plus wages so maybe £7m total for 6 months, that’s £49m we can spend now on loans that might be filler players because they might take a while to get up to speed OR save that money til the summer and spend it on the down payments for 2 players of much higher calibre with at least some prospect of re-sale value in the future
It’s almost like people want us to sign players for the sake of it.
Remember that January when we spent £47m on Tosun and Walcott?
*shudders
Yeah it's a bit weird how some people seem to think loans are completely free. If there's a player available for loan that we want in the long term then great, or if there's someone we think can make a huge difference between now and May that's fine, but I can't get my head round people wanting us to just bring in random players that even they themselves don't rate just because we're allowed to, when it could just be a complete waste of millions of pounds.Don’t we have 2 domestic loans (1 left with Grealish) and 6 international loans?
If you say that you might pay £5m per loan plus wages so maybe £7m total for 6 months, that’s £49m we can spend now on loans that might be filler players because they might take a while to get up to speed OR save that money til the summer and spend it on the down payments for 2 players of much higher calibre with at least some prospect of re-sale value in the future
His wage may be the bigger issue.City would probably accept and we would pay 20/25 m
hahaha just know Moyes had Lingard at West Ham, resurrected his career. Then got him to train at West Ham later on in his career. And he could play left wingPogba is available for transfer too.

loan fees are normally about 1-2 mil max in january unless you are chasing an elite playerYeah it's a bit weird how some people seem to think loans are completely free. If there's a player available for loan that we want in the long term then great, or if there's someone we think can make a huge difference between now and May that's fine, but I can't get my head round people wanting us to just bring in random players that even they themselves don't rate just because we're allowed to, when it could just be a complete waste of millions of pounds.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.