Bob Elstone
Player Valuation: £35m
Why do people think city will loan us Bobb when Fulham have offered 35m to buy him???
We'll go with what we’ve gotZero excuse as to why we can’t enter the loan market for a winger now.
Zero.
We'll go with what we’ve got
We can enter it. Whether we win the competition is another pointZero excuse as to why we can’t enter the loan market for a winger now.
Zero.

Because certain places on the internet are infested with crayon munchers.Why do people think city will loan us Bobb when Fulham have offered 35m to buy him???
huh did Grealish injury not happen yesterday ? even so he still needs to see the specialist.Obviously things can change, but listening to updates from the Bobble, I'm not feeling optimistic.
The club haven't even had discussions as to whether or not they will send Grealish back to City, apparently. Yet they think he will be out for at least 3 months before he's back training.
Why do people think city will loan us Bobb when Fulham have offered 35m to buy him???
I don’t think anyone is saying we should cancel the loan if it’s not an option, if it’s up for negotiation, then we should and if there’s a clause in the deal saying we can then we definitely should. Given what we’ve gone through with spending the last decade it’d be ridiculous to spend 5-7m on wages on a player who MAY not play again until the last month of season.Bizarre number of people saying we should cancel Grealish's loan
City would have to agree to this and we are currently covering somewhere in the region of £200k per week of Grealish's wages - why would City possibly agree to cancelling the loan just so they can pay those wages themselves instead?
Not happening at all
Agree, I don’t think it would even be an option in what we agreed with City.Bizarre number of people saying we should cancel Grealish's loan
City would have to agree to this and we are currently covering somewhere in the region of £200k per week of Grealish's wages - why would City possibly agree to cancelling the loan just so they can pay those wages themselves instead?
Not happening at all
Always imagine there must be clauses or insurance about injuries in loans that reduce payments - maybe I'm naive.I don’t think anyone is saying we should cancel the loan if it’s not an option, if it’s up for negotiation, then we should and if there’s a clause in the deal saying we can then we definitely should. Given what we’ve gone through with spending the last decade it’d be ridiculous to spend 5-7m on wages on a player who MAY not play again until the last month of season.
McNeil says hiZero excuse as to why we can’t enter the loan market for a winger now.
Zero.
Generally stuff like this is built into the contract. You are on loan, you get an injury, you are out, you generally go back.Bizarre number of people saying we should cancel Grealish's loan
City would have to agree to this and we are currently covering somewhere in the region of £200k per week of Grealish's wages - why would City possibly agree to cancelling the loan just so they can pay those wages themselves instead?
Not happening at all
Zero excuse as to why we can’t enter the loan market for a winger now.
Zero.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.