Piers Morgan actually lets the other guy speak here, which I'm surprised by as normally he can't stop interrupting
Zat can't tell the difference between innocent Palestinians and Hamas because he's a bigot who views them as terrorists also, and has a hardon for certain Abrahamic religions and not others.Yeah, on to ignore you go.
Literally making things up to get outraged about.
Honestly, go outside for a bit, get some fresh air, you’ve made an absolute bell of yourself on this thread.
Do you not think that providing two carrier battle groups in theatre along with additional THAAD and Patriot batteries and replacing Israel’s arsenal of Tamir interceptor missiles gives the US a say in what happens next?There's nothing we can do to stop him, any more than we can make the Israelis let fuel into Gaza or turn the power on so that hospitals and desalination plants can function. Israel is a sovereign nation, the only lever we have to pull is foreign aid and we can't do much there with the House functionally closed.
This is precisely my point. We can tell them we will deny further military assistance, cut off funding and alter our Security Council position. What happens next is up to them.Having said all that, it’s not inconceivable that Bibi will ignore any advice given and just pile straight into Gaza.
Because the occupation/invasion had stopped! How can Palestinians “get over their wars” when Israel continue to occupy and expand?
What would you do, Pete?
That is a mythical situation while Israel continue to expand and have no intentions of returning the land.I think I answered this further back. Two state solution drawn up within the West Bank ….
I was thinking more along the lines of reviewing the Israeli ground assault plan - then telling them it’s a crap idea.This is precisely my point. We can tell them we will deny further military assistance, cut off funding and alter our Security Council position. What happens next is up to them.
We can't invade a nuclear power - if we were willing to do that, there's a decent chance we would have boots on the ground in Moscow - so the decision is ultimately theirs.
For the expert in the thread:
Incidentally, she is a brilliant person to follow when it comes to media
That is a mythical situation while Israel continue to expand and have no intentions of returning the land.
So I ask you again, what would you do in Palestinians shoes?
But if we take the one everyone uses it kind of adds context and undermines the entire 'anti semite' argument doesn't it? Other than Palestinians being actual semitic people, versus American christian fundamentalist zionists who support Israel in an end times narrative whereby the Jews themselves (originally nomads) are wiped out for not accepting Christ? Isn't that what everyone is accusing Hamas and the Palestinians of wanting, the eradication of the Jews?There are different schools of thought regarding Zionsim within Orthodox Jewry.
I agree with this, but it was an orthodox rabbi, Avraham Isaac Kook, and his son, Zvi Yehuda Kook, who's philosophy gave Zionism the religious aspect we see today, and the MercazHaRav yeshiva in Jerusalem, from where they taught, has turned out hundreds of today's most militant settlers. Kook the Elder was around at the same time as Theodore Herzl, but his relationship with the Zionists wasn't always straightforward. It is the son who really bought the two together. Both served as Chief Rabbi of Mandate Palestine, IIRC.But if we take the one everyone uses it kind of adds context and undermines the entire 'anti semite' argument doesn't it? Other than Palestinians being actual semitic people, versus American christian fundamentalist zionists who support Israel in an end times narrative whereby the Jews themselves (originally nomads) are wiped out for not accepting Christ? Isn't that what everyone is accusing Hamas and the Palestinians of wanting, the eradication of the Jews?
The accepted form of zionism remains, and, iirc, wasn't actually pushed by any orthodox jews at its inception, rather fought against until this day.
I know you weren't. My point there is just that it is what would be required to stop them, if sufficiently determined.I was thinking more along the lines of reviewing the Israeli ground assault plan - then telling them it’s a crap idea.
Certainly wasn’t thinking along the lines of US military intervention![]()
Sounds beautiful - for ISrael. The settlers are never EVER going to move! They have taken lands and homes from their hosts and attacked them regularly for protesting. This has gone too far for "peace". Your peace (in Israel's favour) would involve the map of Palestine staying pretty much as it is now, something that they (palestinians) cannot and obviously should not have to accept. It is slightly akin to Ukraine but far worse. The invading aggressor demands lands which are not theirs. For the victims it is either put up or shut up to people like you and Kevtherat/davek/zatExpel Hamas and let the Palestinians and Israelis negotiate, without a threat of terrorism, under the oversight of UN representation. Otherwise this will just continue, Gaza will be raised and the whole of the Gaza Strip will be completely cut off from Israel and any support, leaving Egypt as its only link. Israel will continue doing what it is doing in the West Bank and Palestinians will be the only ones who suffer…..not a pretty future….
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.