Great stuff, we can take 500 murders away from the Terrorist state of Israel.So now NY Times apologizing for pushing Hamas narrative about hospital blast.
So its still 6000+ and increasing hourly.
Great stuff, we can take 500 murders away from the Terrorist state of Israel.So now NY Times apologizing for pushing Hamas narrative about hospital blast.
I've just read that report and it says no such thing.So now NY Times apologizing for pushing Hamas narrative about hospital blast.
He wont reply, hes busy wanking himself off to murdered kids.I've just read that report and it says no such thing.
He wont reply, hes busy wanking himself off to murdered kids.
Him and Zat on Facetime mutual masturbating about the murders committed today.
If you call them out, it must mean you are an anti-Semitic lad.
I'm reading PoliticoI've just read that report and it says no such thing.
NYT pressured by interested parties. All in the interests of "balance" of course. Nothing to see here.I'm reading Politico
"The New York Times walked back its initial coverage on the explosion that killed hundreds of Palestinians at a Gaza Strip hospital last week, saying in an editors’ note that the newspaper “relied too heavily on claims” made by the Hamas militant group."
I know it's awfully hard to admit that you were bamboozled by propaganda.
Jumped the gun so to speak
The BBCs coverage of thiswarslaughter: mention quickly that 2,000 Palestinian kids have been killed then spend the next 15 minutes covering a funeral for an Israeli killed by Hamas.
With the absence of providing a link I just assumed he was lying as per anyway.I've just read that report and it says no such thing.
The son of a Hamas leaders son who has switched sides and now resides in the states was interviewed over the weekend. He was advocating an IDF ground offensive and saying as part of this they'd need to use gas because of the tunnels! It was very bizarre and worrying to hear and felt like a pretext.
How does that stack up with the declared aims and ambitions of Hamas….
“ Released on August 18, 1988, the original covenant spells out clearly Hamas’s genocidal intentions. Accordingly, what happened in Israel on Saturday is completely in keeping with Hamas’s explicit aims and stated objectives. It was, in fact, the inchoate realization of Hamas’s true ambitions.
The most relevant of the document’s 36 articles can be summarized as falling within four main themes:
The complete destruction of Israel as an essential condition for the liberation of Palestine and the establishment of a theocratic state based on Islamic law (Sharia),
The need for both unrestrained and unceasing holy war (jihad) to attain the above objective,
The deliberate disdain for, and dismissal of, any negotiated resolution or political settlement of Jewish and Muslim claims to the Holy Land, and
The reinforcement of historical anti-Semitic tropes and calumnies married to sinister conspiracy theories.
Thus, as fighting rages in Israel and Gaza, and may yet escalate and spread, pleas for moderation, restraint, negotiation, and the building of pathways to peace are destined to find no purchase with Hamas. The covenant makes clear that holy war, divinely ordained and scripturally sanctioned, is in Hamas’s DNA.”…..
We can say same about hospital bombings yeno. Ultimately this just shows theres two camps and no matter what happens it will be downplayed by the other side. And dont say you havent chosen yours.
You are actually beyond hope or help. You're so full of spoonfed rhetoric that if Bibi buggered you dry you'd claim it was love. Absolute weasel you are.I'm reading Politico
"The New York Times walked back its initial coverage on the explosion that killed hundreds of Palestinians at a Gaza Strip hospital last week, saying in an editors’ note that the newspaper “relied too heavily on claims” made by the Hamas militant group."
I know it's awfully hard to admit that you were bamboozled by propaganda.
Jumped the gun so to speak
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.