This isn't the first time I've said this I'm almost certain, but supporters are allowed to have different thoughts and feeling towards the club than yours without it making them lesser. The only thing you really tend to contribute around here is a looking down your nose arrogance toward more or less everyone, and it's a sad existence. People care in different ways and want to see different things. I want us to win each and every week, but I want us to be a side that actually exists at a level that they can win every week more than that. If that makes me a bad fan whatever, I'm not looking for approval anyway.
You're asking posters to highlight what Armstrong is "good" at.
The answer is, everything. He's an all rounder.
You compare with
Iroegbunam and his positioning and passing is better. Then you can compare with Scholes and his tackling is better.
Then you say "in the premier league".
He's only just turned 19 and started playing in the premier league.
On his current trajectory he'll be a permanent fixture in our and Englands midfield for over a decade.
Whether he can continue improving and developing is a whole different question. The leadership, confidence and yet seemingly 'down to earth' mentality will serve him well, hopefully.
Someone with Armstrongs skillset could become a fantastic all rounder. There will be other players who are better at individual things but he could be very good at everything.
In English olden times, midfielders used to have to be good at everything. There werent really 6,8 or 10s. We played 442 and those 2 central midfielders needed to be all rounders.
Currently we have Gana & Garner there. It should be
KDH & Garner. Armstrong will be competing with those 2 who should be around the England squads.
If he can push them then it means hes doing well.