Current Affairs George Floyd and Minneapolis Unrest

Status
Not open for further replies.
He robbed a taser off a policeman and then fired it at him. Hardly a minor misdemeanour.

He also showed absolutely zero concern for the lives of others when he drove a car drunk.
Before I start, I'm in no way condoning the shooting and hopefully it is thoroughly investigated and impartially investigated by the relevant authorities.

The video is out there on Twitter if people want to look and for me it shows that he is resisting arrest and breaks free from the restraints with an officer's taser.

Yet, it is difficult to distinguish whether he has aimed or used the taser towards an officer; you can see an officer deploy their taser which appears unsuccessful.

Now, from what I could see it is difficult to distinguish because it's out of view of the video whether the first office (making chase) uses his side arm or the second.

It is therefore also pure speculation with regards to why the officer opened fire: was there justifiable risk* or has he wrongly gunned him down as he fled.

Until all that is answered, it's nigh on impossible to discuss whether race played any part in the shooting because its legality has yet to be decided.

*This comes back to whether he's used the taser before and what happens off camera.
 
They could just have let him run away. They had his car so could easily track him down.
When a taser is targeted the cops, the cops had to act at the spur of the moment. A split second decision. Once a taser is shot at the cops, they can easily be disarmed. You mention about the second cop, but this suspect already overpowered both cops and stole one of their tasers.
 
Refer back to my post regarding why people in the police and military are trained to hit the centre mass: it is the safest option for all involved in the wider context.

If you want all officers accurately hitting slim and moving limbs, then they need thousands of hours of range work on an annual basis: special forces esque.*

This is the result of people watching films and games and thinking it is a realistic possibility whereas in reality it's not... far from it.

*even then it's centre mass or head within a certain range.
No, I get the "why do they aim at center mass" completely. I'm just advocating that maybe they SHOULD have those thousands of hours before being deployed on the streets with a deadly weapon and a fear that everyone who gets away will kill everyone they love so they ought to kill them.
 
From the video all I have seen is the guy resisting for what ever reason. Takes the cops taser, run off before turning and firing it at the officer.

I’m pretty sure the officer used his taser on the fella which has no effect.
I’d imagine if we didn’t have the George Floyd incident there would not be as much scrutiny on this.

I suppose you could argue the fella was running away, albeit with the cops taser, but if he’s running away I’d say the threat towards the cop is lowered.
 
No, I get the "why do they aim at center mass" completely. I'm just advocating that maybe they SHOULD have those thousands of hours before being deployed on the streets with a deadly weapon and a fear that everyone who gets away will kill everyone they love so they ought to kill them.
I agree with the sentiment but it’s the practicalities of: it would need constant training so repeated practice week on week, year on year.

That’s simply not practical in terms of their roles and responsibilities because in reality it would take much of their time away from being on the street.

In reality, the bigger issue within the US is the readiness and willingness to draw their firearm rather than the practicalities of how they use it.

I’d be asking those officers to justify the need to draw their firearm in that situation. The standard for this should be high! But then US gun culture...
 
I agree with the sentiment but it’s the practicalities of: it would need constant training so repeated practice week on week, year on year.

That’s simply not practical in terms of their roles and responsibilities because in reality it would take much of their time away from being on the street.

In reality, the bigger issue within the US is the readiness and willingness to draw their firearm rather than the practicalities of how they use it.

I’d be asking those officers to justify the need to draw their firearm in that situation. The standard for this should be high! But then US gun culture...
You put it more eloquently than I, agree completely.
 
When a taser is targeted the cops, the cops had to act at the spur of the moment. A split second decision. Once a taser is shot at the cops, they can easily be disarmed. You mention about the second cop, but this suspect already overpowered both cops and stole one of their tasers.
The guy was running away from the policemen. He had fired the taser. The policemen were not in any immediate danger. If in that split second the policeman's decision was to shoot then he has shown himself to be completely unsuited to being a policeman.
 
100%. No wonder that you’d crap yourself and run after seeing constant videos of police killing a black guy for the last week. Dunno how you can justify taking someone’s life in these circumstances.

Weird place the states. Fight for small government but back authorities being able to shoot others for minor misdemeanours.
Exactly. Deserted car park in the night and two coppers kneeling on your body. The feller panicked and ran for his life. His only mistake was to turn and point the taser at the coppers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top