Current Affairs General US politics (ie, not POTUS related)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yu the Great said:
It was as credible as a reds*ite penalty in front of the Kop.

She was inconsistent on numerous occasions. I don't like the Republicans at all, they're more responsible for the election of Donald Trump than the Dems, however some people are severely biased to the point of being myopic.
Click to expand...

Do you care to elaborate?
 
steveojcc said:
Do you care to elaborate?
Click to expand...

Sure.

  1. Recalling the details of her actions in the time since accusing the defendant several decades after the alleged event took place
  2. Saying that she was attacked by four men, despite then saying she was attacked by two.
  3. Saying that the Wash. Post reviewed her Therapists notes before saying that she cannot remember if they did.
  4. Her attorney not providing the notes as evidence for the testimony
  5. The polygraph test.
 
Yu the Great said:
Sure.

  1. Recalling the details of her actions in the time since accusing the defendant several decades after the alleged event took place
  2. Saying that she was attacked by four men, despite then saying she was attacked by two.
  3. Saying that the Wash. Post reviewed her Therapists notes before saying that she cannot remember if they did.
  4. Her attorney not providing the notes as evidence for the testimony
  5. The polygraph test.
Click to expand...

You don't deserve my time. Goodbye.
 
Yu the Great said:
Sure.

  1. Recalling the details of her actions in the time since accusing the defendant several decades after the alleged event took place
  2. Saying that she was attacked by four men, despite then saying she was attacked by two.
  3. Saying that the Wash. Post reviewed her Therapists notes before saying that she cannot remember if they did.
  4. Her attorney not providing the notes as evidence for the testimony
  5. The polygraph test.
Click to expand...


1. Hmm you seem to be reaching and simply repeating what fox news and other conservative outlets have said and yet you call @ilikecheese partisan
2. Nope you are wrong. that was a recall of how many people she remembered at the party. She has always said it was just two in the room. go read the transcripts
3. Nope wrong again read the transcripts. She wasnt sure if the full notes were given as she said the therapists dont take details of events just feelings and emotions so she was unclear what they may have got from any notes they may have seen.
4. Again she didnt have the full notes see above. The Republicans refused to allow her therapist testify or evne be there today so her lawyer explained they could not get much more anyway same goes for the polygraph tech.
5. See above....

Not concrete evidence at all really....

Before you accuse me of being partisan dont waste your breath. I though the democrats were equally terrible today with their questions and handling of it as you will see from my comments above.

But i do believe Ford is credible and should be given her day or at very least an FBI investigation.

The Republicans did everything they could to wash this whole thing away even accusing the democrats of a conspiracy..
 
LinekersLegs said:
I think one of the more surreal parts of today was Lindsey Graham screaming “I don’t know who paid for her ploygraph but somebody paid for it” like it was a luxury all expenses paid trip to the Hawaii.
Click to expand...

I think it was a serious point, not the value of the event but it’s intent. If it had been paid by the Democrats, there would have been a serious political issue. If has been said, that it was paid for by a legal team, who are accepting no money, then again a question would be why, and what are the political leanings or affiliations of the legal team. Intent is everything and the question would certainly play well to republicans and anyone sitting on the fence.......
 
peteblue said:
I think it was a serious point, not the value of the event but it’s intent. If it had been paid by the Democrats, there would have been a serious political issue. If has been said, that it was paid for by a legal team, who are accepting no money, then again a question would be why, and what are the political leanings or affiliations of the legal team. Intent is everything and the question would certainly play well to republicans and anyone sitting on the fence.......
Click to expand...
They cost about a grand, it's a political football only if it's made one. Her legal team will probably cost it back to her eventually.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top