I did watch it but I think you didnt.
Incorrect and the fact just about everyone replying to you says you are wrong then it tells me you didn't quite catch the jist of what was going on then.
I did watch it but I think you didnt.
Yes he definitely was and If you think he was acting professionally...well...im not suprised anymoreGood but you still think he was out of order for trying to finish his sentence?!
Or, in what's truly beyond bizarre for a sitting Head of State, he talks about the Nielsen ratings of the network he or she works for.Err you just made that up didn't you? The very next guy up defended Acosta and many off the others in the room didn't have a problem with him. Did you watch the press conference? I am guessing not and you just saw snippets on fox news or something.
You are clearly trolling, that or you haven't been paying attention to how Trump treats 90% of the journalists who have passes to be there. He only ever really addresses conservative journalists and calls everyone else fake or disrespects them with childish name calling.
Also stop referring to metoo clearly you have no idea what that is about.
The only people who think it was assault or worse again sexual assault are fox news and breitbart. Everyone else agrees Acosta is a bit of a showboat but does not deserve to lose his pass for the incident and like i said no one called it assault in the white house until breitbart made that video and fox news got their hands on it. Then only then was it "assault"
Haha, you clearly missed when I stated that peeps who think he assaulted her are bellends
If you think that and believe that how do you come to the assessment that the intern was "humiliated" and this should be a case for metoo.
I think you are confused. If you believe it wasn't assault then why would you think the metoo should get involved? which is it?
This post shows how deep in their own trenches people are.
Yes he definitely was and If you think he was acting professionally...well...im not suprised anymore
Pot calling kettle? you have done your upmost to say it was a crime but it wasn't a crime at the same time. Oh and it some activist type of stuff blah blah blah.....
Hilarious.
no it doesnt, you're contradicting your self. He's just asking for clarification.This post shows how deep in their own trenches people are.
Pot calling kettle? you have done your upmost to say it was a crime but it wasn't a crime at the same time. Oh and it some activist type of stuff blah blah blah.....
Hilarious.
You are 15 arent you? It is too complicated for some, you would have preferred if I would have said it was an assault. Would have been easier for you.
You are 15 arent you? It is too complicated for some, you would have preferred if I would have said it was an assault. Would have been easier for you.
How about this quid pro quo:
We give up some leniency in 1st Amendment rights for a 3rd Millenium understanding of the 2nd Amendment
Ball's in your court GOP
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.