Looks like it was passed 2 years ago? Like a lot of stuff like this you have to go through a lot of waffle and terminology crap to get to the point but it looks like it was passed?
That is the wrong way to look at it. I mean, I was born a man and I am still a man, that isn't an ideology just in the same way somebody who knows that they don't feel comfortable in their own body is not feeling that way in ideological way. They are feeling like that because they feel like that, this is not a choice they are making.
From my point of view the issue has been addressed. It is the issue of saying it is an ideology, using words such as 'morph', using a small subset of the community to punish and degrade the rest of that community.
Nothing wrong with not liking it, it is not a agree/disagree situation with how they feel though. The act of allowing them to feel like a woman/man has been turned into a political tool and people lap it up because they don't understand it and some may shouting a bit too loud because they want to hide their own feelings. I am sure I heard recently that the majority of US searches for transexual porn was in historically red states.
It really is an ideology. It's a postmodernist ideology that goes against millennia of custom and convention, and indeed science. It's an ideology that many people disagree with.
Look at you trying to police my language, and making out that my language is the problem at hand. You can't say morph, you must say transition!
I'm all for TRANS rights tbh, i.e the right for trans people to be free from discrimination. But I don't think we should ignore the TRANS in trans rights. You can be trans but you can't morph into the opposite sex, it's not possible, and only the postmodernists would argue otherwise.
"I don't mind them as long as they keep it behind closed doors" etc.
Unfortunately I don't think that one has quite gone away even in this decade, going by the amount of people complaining about gay characters on TV shows.
You make a good point in referring to the historic plight of gay rights. Where was all this postmodern nonsense back in the 80’s when the LGB community actually had some really bad stuff to be dealing with?
The reason there were was no trans activism back then was because the trans community was considered to be part of the gay community, and I think this is correct. I don’t think that being an effeminate boy is an indicator that the little boy may actually be a little girl. He might be gay, he might not be, but he hasn’t acquired the ability to morph into the opposite sex. He remains an effeminate BOY.
The 1980’s LGB community were dealing with pure oppression and all kinds of other stuff, and my understanding is that they were saying ‘Let us be, and leave us alone”, which is more than fair enough. But this new ideology is fundamentally based on a distortion of reality that actually has massive consequences in society, and it’s an ideology that the authorities are literally insisting that you abide by… or else!
Despite no identifying male characteristics, it is long established that Morph uses male pronouns such as he/him. Even though this goes against millennia of custom and convention, this apparently doesn't bother anyone.
You make a good point in referring to the historic plight of gay rights. Where was all this postmodern nonsense back in the 80’s when the LGB community actually had some really bad stuff to be dealing with?
The reason there were was no trans activism back then was because the trans community was considered to be part of the gay community. And I think this is correct, I don’t think being an effeminate boy is an indicator that he may actually be a girl. He might be gay, he might not be, but he hasn’t acquired the ability to morph into the opposite sex. He remains an effeminate BOY.
The 1980’s LGB community were dealing with pure oppression and all kinds of other stuff, and my understanding is that they were saying ‘Let us be, and leave us alone”, which is more than fair enough. But this new ideology is fundamentally based on a distortion of reality that actually has massive consequences in society, and it’s an ideology that the authorities are literally insisting that you abide by… or else!
My gym training partner is old school gay, as camp as a row of pink tents - and absolutely hates the LGBTQIA+++ rubbish, he feels it's taken the genuine fight of the gay community back by decades. 'Trans the gay away' - internalised homophobia, you're not gay if you're in the wrong body.
Homosexuality is who you are sexually attracted to, trans is who you feel YOU are and the 2 aren't related in the slightest.
Dumfounds me all of this, leave me alone - don't tell me how to think, what to say, I don't care about your pronouns and I'm certainly not going to affirm your narcisstic delusions just to make you happy.
My gym training partner is old school gay, as camp as a row of pink tents - and absolutely hates the LGBTQIA+++ rubbish, he feels it's taken the genuine fight of the gay community back by decades. 'Trans the gay away' - internalised homophobia, you're not gay if you're in the wrong body.
Homosexuality is who you are sexually attracted to, trans is who you feel YOU are and the 2 aren't related in the slightest.
Dumfounds me all of this, leave me alone - don't tell me how to think, what to say, I don't care about your pronouns and I'm certainly not going to affirm your narcisstic delusions just to make you happy.
No one is telling you how to think - you do not even need to think about trans people from one month to the next however, YOU CHOSE TO and you CHOSE TO GET ANGRY ABOUT IT
Looks like it was passed 2 years ago? Like a lot of stuff like this you have to go through a lot of waffle and terminology crap to get to the point but it looks like it was passed?
OK, maybe you do mean morph in its literal sense but I feel that it may be a bit more of a context thing and the rest of the words around it imply a choice. There is no choice.
Why is the bill a bad thing, exactly? Is it no different to any kind of change of legal status, i.e. becoming a citizen if a country allows you to have different rights, etc. than were maybe just a resident? Getting married allows you to have different rights than being single. In some countries being religious/non-religious allows you to have different legal rights.
I could write an essay on why such legislation would be dangerous, but I can't be arsed. To be brief, it erodes women's rights, and brings about major safeguarding issues.
You make a good point in referring to the historic plight of gay rights. Where was all this postmodern nonsense back in the 80’s when the LGB community actually had some really bad stuff to be dealing with?
The reason there were was no trans activism back then was because the trans community was considered to be part of the gay community, and I think this is correct. I don’t think that being an effeminate boy is an indicator that the little boy may actually be a little girl. He might be gay, he might not be, but he hasn’t acquired the ability to morph into the opposite sex. He remains an effeminate BOY.
The 1980’s LGB community were dealing with pure oppression and all kinds of other stuff, and my understanding is that they were saying ‘Let us be, and leave us alone”, which is more than fair enough. But this new ideology is fundamentally based on a distortion of reality that actually has massive consequences in society, and it’s an ideology that the authorities are literally insisting that you abide by… or else!
distortion of reality that actually has massive consequences in society, and it’s an ideology that the authorities are literally insisting that you abide by… or else!
utter nonsense.
If you went about your day to day life, I am fairly sure you would not be effected by trans issues once in a whole year-you are looking to be offended by it despite it not being anywhere near your life
No one is telling you how to think - you do not even need to think about trans people from one month to the next however, YOU CHOSE TO and you CHOSE TO GET ANGRY ABOUT IT
I say that changing sex is biologically impossible (which for mammals, it is) you state this is transphobic and I'm a nazi and a bigot.
I say transwomen in biological womens sports is unfair, you say that's transphobic and I'm a nazi and a bigot.
I say transwomen in women's prisons, changing rooms and bathrooms is dangerous and unfair to biological women, you say that's transphobic and I'm a nazi and a bigot.
Now I know I'm not transphobic, or a nazi - or bigotted. I just like facts and freedom of speech, both of which seem to be the enemy of the woke.
distortion of reality that actually has massive consequences in society, and it’s an ideology that the authorities are literally insisting that you abide by… or else!
utter nonsense.
If you went about your day to day life, I am fairly sure you would not be effected by trans issues once in a whole year-you are looking to be offended by it despite it not being anywhere near your life
You are the one using capital letters, my friend. The internet version of SHOUTING!
I can assure you that I am not arsed. I actually find it rather boring and tedious. Arguing the toss about postmodern nonsense isn't my idea of a good time.
But I'm not a woman, or a female athlete that is having their sporting success taken away by a man. I'm not a vulnerable female victim of domestic violence that doesn't want to share their prison cell with a male rapist.
I will say it again, I think people that are trans should be able to live a life free from discrimination, but I don't believe that being trans involves morphing into the opposite sex. I don't think people that are trans should be able to acquire the rights of a cohort that they do not belong to.
You are the one using capital letters, my friend. The internet version of SHOUTING!
I can assure you that I am not arsed. I actually find it rather boring and tedious. Arguing the toss about postmodern nonsense isn't my idea of a good time.
But I'm not a woman, or a female athlete that is having their sporting success taken away by a man. I'm not a vulnerable female victim of domestic violence that doesn't want to share their prison cell with a male rapist.
I will say it again, I think people that are trans should be able to live a life free from discrimination, but I don't believe that being trans involves morphing into the opposite sex. I don't think people that are trans should be able to acquire the rights of a cohort that they do not belong to.
I say that changing sex is biologically impossible (which for mammals, it is) you state this is transphobic and I'm a nazi and a bigot.
I say transwomen in biological womens sports is unfair, you say that's transphobic and I'm a nazi and a bigot.
I say transwomen in women's prisons, changing rooms and bathrooms is dangerous and unfair to biological women, you say that's transphobic and I'm a nazi and a bigot.
Now I know I'm not transphobic, or a nazi - or bigotted. I just like facts and freedom of speech, both of which seem to be the enemy of the woke.
You are the one using capital letters, my friend. The internet version of SHOUTING!
I can assure you that I am not arsed. I actually find it rather boring and tedious. Arguing the toss about postmodern nonsense isn't my idea of a good time.
But I'm not a woman, or a female athlete that is having their sporting success taken away by a man. I'm not a vulnerable female victim of domestic violence that doesn't want to share their prison cell with a male rapist.
I will say it again, I think people that are trans should be able to live a life free from discrimination, but I don't believe that being trans involves morphing into the opposite sex. I don't think people that are trans should be able to acquire the rights of a cohort that they do not belong to.
THe instances that bother you are tiny, why not talk about male-women domestic violence? Drugs cheats in sport? Violence in prison? Similar situations that actually occur regularly.
It seems such a strange thing to get hung up on and, unfortunately, is a cause pushed by many right-wing idiots. That is why I question your motive tbh